Open Stack

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 06/03/2013 02:14 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
> > On 6/3/13 10:24 AM, "Russell Bryant" <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 06/02/2013 11:09 AM, Jarret Raim wrote:
> >>> Both the Barbican (Key Management) and Meniscus (Logging) projects are
> >>> moving down the path of using jsonschema for message validation.
> >>
> >> But please take a look at WSME.  We've deprecated the home grown wsgi
> >> code in Oslo.  Instead, we're encouraging all projects to adopt similar
> >> tooling (pecan and WSME) when developing new APIs.
> >
> > We aren't using the oslo stuff, we've been using Falcon up until now. It
> > seems to me like there still isn't much consensus on the common wsgi
> > question. There seem to be quite a few projects who aren't going to use
> it
> > or can't use it for some reason. I'm just pulling from memory so let me
> > know if I've got the wrong impression. Do we have a list of which
> projects
> > are currently using Pecan? And which ones are planning on migrating?
>
>
> Off the top of my head, I believe that in addition to ceilometer and
> ironic are both using pecan, and someone else was talking about it for
> their next api rev - but I honestly don't remember.


I'm in the process of moving Cinder to pecan/wsme for I. I believe Quantum
was also doing the same.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130619/009add18/attachment.html>