Open Stack

On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 07:52 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> The current debate is whether or not this is defined policy. My feeling 
> was the results of the TC discussion meant that this was defined policy. 
> 95%+ of code files currently do this, it ensures that there is no 
> ambiguity on the fact that these files are under this license. Various 
> interpretations of copyright might say they are not required, but as we 
> have, by convention, already basically implemented this policy, I'd like 
> to just finish the enforcement in hacking so it's yet another thing we 
> don't need to manually review for. 

Agree, it's pretty clearly our de-facto policy that we include a license
header in python files.

Cheers,
Mark.