Open Stack

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/31/2013 09:34 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/31/2013 08:45 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> >>> And if that's true... why not just give the flat 11 a shot. If it seems
> >>> to work, cool. Super low maintenance, no bikeshedding on categories, no
> >>> PTL growth concerns blocking things from getting incubated.
> >>>
> >>> If not, in 6 months or a year we revisit. Which we'd have to do on any
> >>> category based model anyway. If OpenStack has taught me anything, it's
> >>> that predicting where OpenStack is going to be in a year is really
> hard.
> >>> Encoding the future structure of the TC, based on a snapshot of what
> >>> OpenStack seems to care about today, just seems doomed to unoptimal
> results.
> >>
> >> That's very much my feeling too.
> >>
> >> I'm actually pretty disappointed that some of us see so much danger!
> >> (Will Robinson) in the flat 11 model.
> >
>

For some reason early in this thread I was definitely feeling "Danger, Will
Robinson!" for a directly elected 11 member TC.  The "danger" to me lies in
a popularity contest rather than ensuring representation for technical
decisions, plus I'd like some continuity. The six in spring, then five in
the fall, helps with that.

Let's fill in some details on the directly elected. I'd like to know who's
eligible to run and who's eligible to vote before backing it wholeheartedly.

Thanks,
Anne


>  > After having pounced on you in the last one, let me be more positive
> > with this one.
> >
> > I think you're right here- I think we've done an excellent job of
> > building a community of amazing people. Everyone on the TC are stand-up
> > folks with the project's best interests at heart.
> >
> > So I don't think that flat 11 will be an actual problem, and I'm happy
> > to go down that road.
>
> Huge +1 from me.  This is what I'd really like to try right now.
>
> --
> Russell Bryant
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130603/bdc13622/attachment.html>