[openstack-dev] KMIP client for volume encryption key management

Jarret Raim jarret.raim at RACKSPACE.COM
Wed Jul 24 13:43:35 UTC 2013


>· Agreed that there isn¹t an existing KMIP client in python. We are
>offering to port the needed functionality from our current java KMIP
>client  to python and contribute it to openstack.

Are you taking about porting to Python or having python call a Java
wrapper?


>· Good points about the common features that barbican provides. I will
>take a look at the barbican architecture and join discussions there.

Thanks, we'd love the help.


Jarret


> 
> 
>Thanks,
>Bill
> 
> 
>From: Jarret Raim [mailto:jarret.raim at RACKSPACE.COM]
>
>Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:46 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] KMIP client for volume encryption key
>management
>
>
> 
>I'm not sure that I agree with this direction. In our investigation, KMIP
>is a problematic protocol for several reasons:
>
>
>* We haven't found an implementation of KMIP for Python. (Let us know if
>there is one!)
>* Support for KMIP by HSM vendors is limited.
>* We haven't found software implementations of KMIP suitable for use as
>an HSM replacement. (e.g. Most deployers wanting to use KMIP would have
>to spend a rather large amount of money to purchase HSMs)
>* From our research, the KMIP spec and implementations seem to lack
>support for multi-tenancy. This makes managing keys for thousands of
>users difficult or impossible.
>
>The goal for the Barbican system is to provide key management for
>OpenStack. It uses the standard interaction mechanisms for OpenStack,
>namely ReST and JSON. We integrate with keystone and will
> provide common features like usage events, role-based access control,
>fine grained control, policy support, client libs, Celiometer support,
>Horizon support and other things expected of an OpenStack service. If
>every product is forced to implement KMIP, these
> features would most likely not be provided by whatever vendor is used
>for the Key Manager. Additionally, as mentioned in the blueprint, I have
>concerns that vendor specific data will be leaked into the rest of
>OpenStack for things like key identifiers, authentication
> and the like. 
>
>
>
> 
>
>I would propose that rather than each product implement KMIP support, we
>implement KMIP support into Barbican. This will allow the products to
>speak ReST / JSON using our client libraries just
> like any other OpenStack system and Barbican will take care of being a
>good OpenStack citizen. On the backend, Barbican will support the use of
>KMIP to talk to whatever device the provider wishes to deploy. We will
>also support other interaction mechanisms
> including PKCS through OpenSSH, a development implementation and a fully
>free and open source software implementation. This also allows some
>advanced uses cases including federation. Federation will allow customers
>of public clouds like Rackspace's to maintain
> custody of their keys while still being able to delegate their use to
>the Cloud for specific tasks.
>
> 
>
>I've been asked about KMIP support at the Summit and by several of
>Rackspace's partners. I was planning on getting to it at some point,
>probably after Icehouse. This is mostly due to the fact that
> we didn't find a suitable KMIP implementation for Python so it looks
>like we'd have to write one. If there is interest from people to create
>that implementation, we'd be happy to help do the work to integrate it
>into Barbican.
>
> 
>
>We just released our M2 milestone and we are on track for our 1.0 release
>for Havana. I would encourage anyone interested to check our what we are
>working on and come help us out. We use this list
> for most of our discussions and we hang out on #openstack-cloudkeep on
>free node. 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jarret
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>From: <Becker>, Bill <Bill.Becker at safenet-inc.com>
>Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>Date: Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:11 PM
>To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>Subject: [openstack-dev] KMIP client for volume encryption key management
>
> 
>
>A blueprint and spec to add a client that implements OASIS KMIP standard
>was recently added:
> 
>https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/kmip-client-for-volume-encrypt
>ion
>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/KMIPclient
> 
> 
>We¹re looking for feedback to the set of questions in the spec. Any
>additional input is also appreciated.
> 
>Thanks,
>Bill B.
>The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
>privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If
>you have received this communication in error, please notify us
>immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
>computer without copying or disclosing it.
>
>
>The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
>may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
>from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
>error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
>message and deleting it from your computer without copying
>or disclosing it.
>
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list