Open Stack

My company, IBM, is working on the professional translation of those
messages.
We could contribute the translation to community when it is done.

Even there may be a small version difference, but that will reduce
the workload of the volunteer translators a lot and improve the coverage
and quality.

Regards
Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote on 2013/01/07 17:19:41:

> Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> 2013/01/07 17:19
>
> Please respond to
> OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>
> To
>
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org,
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [openstack-dev] _() consensus??
>
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > It still makes sense to have REST API messages and log messages be in
> > separate translation domains, though.
>
> Yes. We all agree on the need to provide good translation for
> user-facing API messages, while there is disagreement on the priority of
> translating random operator-facing log messages. Currently we do a
> generally bad job on trying to translate both. Creating two domains
> would help us reach good coverage on the most important part first.
>
> Basically, we shouldn't talk about translating all messages while we
> don't provide good translation for the most important subset of them.
> Creating two domains lets us prioritize the translations work -- and if
> we can't even reach 99% on user-facing messages, then I'd say we should
> reconsider the idea of trying to translate the operator-facing ones.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Release Manager, OpenStack
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130108/cae180d1/attachment.html>