On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Sandy Walsh <sandy.walsh at rackspace.com>wrote: > > > On 01/03/2013 12:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > The ceilometer team is using Pecan [1] for our next-generation API > > framework. [...] > > Out of curiosity, why are you dumping Flask? > The main reason is that Pecan is more friendly for eventually porting to Python 3, but its controller-based development style and object-dispatch are also a little nicer for avoiding "dead" URLs that don't point to anything. The notes from the Grizzly ODS session where I proposed moving to Pecan and WSME for future API development are in this etherpad: http://etherpad.openstack.org/grizzly-common-wsgi-frameworks Doug -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130103/66a6db52/attachment.html>