Open Stack

I continue to point out that Glance has done just fine with JSON-only
support in its API (both v1 and v2).

All the best, love and cuddles,
-jay

On 02/14/2013 03:41 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> I tried to make the meeting today, but was a few minutes late and
> apparently it was very short. :-/
> 
> I have a few concerns/questions about the current API design for Marconi
> (http://wiki.openstack.org/marconi/specs/api/v1) that I wanted to bring up.
> 
> First, using PATCH to claim messages caught my eye. It seems like the
> resources being changed are the messages, rather than the queue where
> the message is sent, so PATCH seems like the wrong verb. Isn't it more
> semantically correct to POST a claim request, and get a claim ID and
> list of messages back? Updating a claim with PATCH makes sense.
> 
> Second, it looks like the plan is to just support JSON in v1. We've had
> good luck building the v2 API for ceilometer using WSME, and getting
> JSON and XML support without having to write custom (really any)
> serialization code. If you're interested, take a look
> at https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/api/controllers/v2.py
> for an example and hit me up here or on IRC (dhellmann in
> openstack-metering) with any questions.
> 
> Doug
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>