I tried to make the meeting today, but was a few minutes late and apparently it was very short. :-/ I have a few concerns/questions about the current API design for Marconi ( http://wiki.openstack.org/marconi/specs/api/v1) that I wanted to bring up. First, using PATCH to claim messages caught my eye. It seems like the resources being changed are the messages, rather than the queue where the message is sent, so PATCH seems like the wrong verb. Isn't it more semantically correct to POST a claim request, and get a claim ID and list of messages back? Updating a claim with PATCH makes sense. Second, it looks like the plan is to just support JSON in v1. We've had good luck building the v2 API for ceilometer using WSME, and getting JSON and XML support without having to write custom (really any) serialization code. If you're interested, take a look at https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/api/controllers/v2.pyfor an example and hit me up here or on IRC (dhellmann in openstack-metering) with any questions. Doug -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130214/80bdfc1b/attachment.html>