Open Stack

It was Eugene Kirpichov,

I've added him to the cc in case he is filtering the -dev mail.

Vish

On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Ray Pekowski <pekowski at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:51 PM, <masumotok at nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> What I am trying to say is, TopicConsumer's queue is declared with
> {'x-ha-policy': 'all'}
> <snip> 
> We can see same declaration at FanoutConsumer, but not DirectConsumer.
> As you know, rpc.call() send request through TopicConsumer, and return values  thorough DirectConsumer. So if TopicConsumer is mirrored, DirectConsumer also should be mirrored, I think.
> 
> Does anyone know who made the changes for this x-ha-policy/mirroring code in impl_kombu.py?  We want to know if leaving mirror off of the RPC reply queue was intended or an oversight?  And if intended, why?
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130201/f10eb116/attachment.html>