<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">It was Eugene Kirpichov,<div><br></div><div>I've added him to the cc in case he is filtering the -dev mail.</div><div><br></div><div>Vish</div><div><br><div><div>On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Ray Pekowski <<a href="mailto:pekowski@gmail.com">pekowski@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:51 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:masumotok@nttdata.co.jp" target="_blank">masumotok@nttdata.co.jp</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What I am trying to say is, TopicConsumer's queue is declared with<br>
{'x-ha-policy': 'all'}<br></blockquote><div><snip> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
We can see same declaration at FanoutConsumer, but not DirectConsumer.<br>
As you know, rpc.call() send request through TopicConsumer, and return values thorough DirectConsumer. So if TopicConsumer is mirrored, DirectConsumer also should be mirrored, I think.<br></blockquote><div><br>Does anyone know who made the changes for this x-ha-policy/mirroring code in impl_kombu.py? We want to know if leaving mirror off of the RPC reply queue was intended or an oversight? And if intended, why?<br>
</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>OpenStack-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>