Open Stack

On 19/12/13 01:28 -0800, John Dickinson wrote:
>Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would allow for meetings to be at the same time, but it would free up more time slots to be scheduled, and those time slots can be scheduled more precisely to fit the schedules of those attending.
>
>So what about cross-team concerns? We have the weekly meeting, and if that isn't sufficient, then the -meeting and -meeting-alt channels can be scheduled for cross-team needs.

+1

I was thinking the exact same thing while reading Robert's email. I
guess we should also consider new projects that don't have a channel
yet. Just as you mentioned, they could use -meeting or -meeting-alt.

Marconi's team has had several 'extra' meetings - mostly for
brainstorming about a specific argument - in #openstack-marconi. All
this meetings where announced properly and worked just fine.

We've done the same for Glance.

I'd like to add that, although I prefer keeping the meetings short,
there are times where 1h may not be enough and people end up using
other team's time or dropping the meeting. Using the project's channel
should help with this as well.


Cheers,
FF

>
>--John
>
>
>
>
>On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>
>> So, I'm a little worried about the complexities of organising free
>> slots given we're basically about to double the # of entrieshave in
>> all our calendars.
>>
>> Maybe we can do something a little simpler: just have the *whole
>> calender* shift phase 180' each week: it won't be perfect,
>> particularly for those projects that currently have a majority of
>> members meeting in the middle of their day (12 midday -> 12 midnight),
>> but if there's any decent spread already meeting, there will be a
>> decent spread for the alter week - and an important thing for
>> inclusion is to not be doing votes etc in meetings *anyway* so I think
>> it's ok for the PTL (for instance) to not be at every meeting.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> --
>> Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
>> Distinguished Technologist
>> HP Converged Cloud
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131219/7adef8a4/attachment.pgp>