Open Stack

Hi David,

I have added my comments underneath line # 97 till line #110, it is mostly aligned with your proposal with some modification.
 
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition


Thanks for your time,
Arvind



-----Original Message-----
From: Tiwari, Arvind 
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 4:22 PM
To: Adam Young; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); David Chadwick
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

Hi Adam and David,

Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good progress.

I have replied to your comments and also added some to support my proposal

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition

David, I like your suggestion for role-def scoping which can fit in my Plan B and I think Adam is cool with plan B.

Please let me know if David's proposal for role-def scoping is cool for everybody?


Thanks,
Arvind

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Young [mailto:ayoung at redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:44 AM
To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Henry Nash; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; David Chadwick
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition



On 11/26/2013 06:57 PM, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Based on our discussion over IRC, I have updated the below etherpad with proposal for nested role definition

Updated.  I made my changes Green.  It isn't easy being green.

>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>
> Please take a look @ "Proposal (Ayoung) - Nested role definitions", I am sorry if I could not catch your idea.
>
> Feel free to update the etherpad.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tiwari, Arvind
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:08 PM
> To: David Chadwick; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP.
>
> Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>
> Thanks again,
> Arvind
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Cc: Henry Nash; ayoung at redhat.com; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; Yee, Guang
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
>
> Hi Arvind
>
> I have just added some comments to your blueprint page
>
> regards
>
> David
>
>
> On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>   
>>
>> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id
>> binding with roles BP
>> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>.
>> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to
>> support this BP.
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and
>> pros and cons analysis
>>
>>   
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>>   
>>
>> Please take look and let me know your thoughts.
>>
>>   
>>
>> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting.
>>
>>   
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arvind
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev