Open Stack

I have added a number of comments to this. I have also expanded on the
concept of role scoping for your consideration

regards

David

On 02/12/2013 23:21, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi Adam and David,
> 
> Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good progress.
> 
> I have replied to your comments and also added some to support my proposal
> 
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
> 
> David, I like your suggestion for role-def scoping which can fit in my Plan B and I think Adam is cool with plan B.
> 
> Please let me know if David's proposal for role-def scoping is cool for everybody?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Arvind
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Young [mailto:ayoung at redhat.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:44 AM
> To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Cc: Henry Nash; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; David Chadwick
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/26/2013 06:57 PM, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> Based on our discussion over IRC, I have updated the below etherpad with proposal for nested role definition
> 
> Updated.  I made my changes Green.  It isn't easy being green.
> 
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>> Please take a look @ "Proposal (Ayoung) - Nested role definitions", I am sorry if I could not catch your idea.
>>
>> Feel free to update the etherpad.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arvind
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tiwari, Arvind
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:08 PM
>> To: David Chadwick; OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Arvind
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM
>> To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> Cc: Henry Nash; ayoung at redhat.com; dolph.mathews at gmail.com; Yee, Guang
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
>>
>> Hi Arvind
>>
>> I have just added some comments to your blueprint page
>>
>> regards
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id
>>> binding with roles BP
>>> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>.
>>> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to
>>> support this BP.
>>>
>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition
>>>
>>> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and
>>> pros and cons analysis
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>> Please take look and let me know your thoughts.
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting.
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Arvind
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>