Open Stack

Hi,

Sure they must have the same provider.
Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways:
- implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes
provider for the instance.
- explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance.
In that case provider attribute will be validated against instance's
provider.

Thanks,
Eugene.


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Itsuro ODA <oda at valinux.co.jp> wrote:

> Hi Eugene, Iwamoto
>
> > You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API
> > compatibility reasons.
> I agree with you.
>
> I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have
> different providers or not. (I think it should be same.)
>
> Thanks
> Itsuto Ofa
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:30 +0400
> Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Iwamoto,
> >
> > You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API
> > compatibility reasons.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eugene.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwamoto at valinux.co.jp
> >wrote:
> >
> > > At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900,
> > > Itsuro ODA wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Eugene,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the response.
> > > >
> > > > I have a comment.
> > > > I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource
> > > > and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple
> > > > driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense.
> > >
> > > There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but,
> > > to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the
> > > same.
> > > Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource?
> > >
> > > > What do you think ?
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking forward to your code up !
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > Itsuro Oda
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400
> > > > Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Itsuro,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that
> > > illustrate
> > > > > proposed API.
> > > > > Please see the updated page:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Eugene.
> > >
> > > --
> > > IWAMOTO Toshihiro
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
>
> --
> Itsuro ODA <oda at valinux.co.jp>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131203/9b6b3051/attachment.html>