On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jarret Raim <jarret.raim at rackspace.com>wrote: > > >Dolph Mathews wrote: > >> With regard > >> to: > >>https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server > >> [...] > > > >Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue > >is settled and the KDS should live in keystone ? > > Dolph and I talked about having a design session to talk about how > Barbican and Keystone will work together going forward. In this particular > case, as I understand it, Simo is right. There isn't much need for > Barbican to be involved in the PKI key signing (except maybe for key > storage at some point, but that wouldn't' require a lot of changes if we > did that). > +1 > > Once the sessions are opened for Hong Kong, we'll put in for the design > session. > > > > Jarret > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- -Dolph -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130821/09063b2e/attachment.html>