<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jarret Raim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jarret.raim@rackspace.com" target="_blank">jarret.raim@rackspace.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
>Dolph Mathews wrote:<br>
>> With regard<br>
>> to:<br>
>><a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server" target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server</a><br>
>> [...]<br>
><br>
>Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue<br>
>is settled and the KDS should live in keystone ?<br>
<br>
</div>Dolph and I talked about having a design session to talk about how<br>
Barbican and Keystone will work together going forward. In this particular<br>
case, as I understand it, Simo is right. There isn't much need for<br>
Barbican to be involved in the PKI key signing (except maybe for key<br>
storage at some point, but that wouldn't' require a lot of changes if we<br>
did that).<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Once the sessions are opened for Hong Kong, we'll put in for the design<br>
session.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
Jarret<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><br></div>-Dolph
</div></div>