On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net>wrote: > Note specifically the citation of 200-400 lines as the knee of the review > effectiveness curve: that's lower than I thought - I thought 200 was > clearly fine - but no. > This is really interesting. I wish they would have explicitly defined "lines of code." Is that "git show |wc -l"? Just the new lines which were added? The sum of the lines changed, removed and added? You can get vastly different numbers depending on how you count it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130819/a5998b39/attachment.html>