Open Stack

Over lunch I can’t I am already booked, Can we take it Monday morning or afternoon?

Best Regards
Alan

From: Sachin Thakkar [mailto:sthakkar at vmware.com]
Sent: April-12-13 2:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion

Not yet - let's see how the summit starts on Monday and then grab a slot amongst ourselves (and any others who are interested). Maybe over lunch?

Sachin
________________________________
From: "Swaminathan Vasudevan (PNB Roseville)" <swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com<mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com>>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:01:22 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion
Hi Sachin/Nachi,
Have we finalized on the time for the Monday meeting.
Thanks.

Swaminathan Vasudevan
Systems Software Engineer (TC)


HP Networking
Hewlett-Packard
8000 Foothills Blvd
M/S 5541
Roseville, CA - 95747
tel: 916.785.0937
fax: 916.785.1815
email: swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com<mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com>

From: Sachin Thakkar [mailto:sthakkar at vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion

The physical device will be all abstraction in the plugin layer.

As a whole, the consensus on the call was to follow the model introduced by LBaaS

Sachin
________________________________
From: "Yapeng Wu" <Yapeng.Wu at huawei.com<mailto:Yapeng.Wu at huawei.com>>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:45:33 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion

Nachi,

I have one question regarding of the page 3 in the slide.

The "VPNGW (Physical)" here implies the physical box terminates VPN connection. Does it have to be physical device? Or physical is one of the implementation?

Thanks,
yapeng

-----Original Message-----
From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:nachi at ntti3.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion

Hi folks

I would like to share the result of 2nd Quantum VPN discussion which
held today on conf call.

We discussed general model of VPN based on usecase we agreed on the 1st meeting.
Current consensus is here, but we will continue model discussion on the Summit.

In the model, each VPN extension will create each own ServiceType,
and inject it to the Router using Service insertion.

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LdL0Fy9PpEQXB9q_c47iJ6gyA1oZn7B6MKbzFyk73tI/edit#slide=id.p

https://etherpad.openstack.org/HavanaVPNaaS

Thanks
Nachi  NTT

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130412/5ea7258a/attachment.html>