Open Stack

Not yet - let's see how the summit starts on Monday and then grab a slot amongst ourselves (and any others who are interested). Maybe over lunch ? 

Sachin 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Swaminathan Vasudevan (PNB Roseville)" <swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com> 
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:01:22 AM 
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion 



Hi Sachin/Nachi, 
Have we finalized on the time for the Monday meeting. 
Thanks. 


Swaminathan Vasudevan 
Systems Software Engineer (TC) 


HP Networking 
Hewlett-Packard 
8000 Foothills Blvd 
M/S 5541 
Roseville, CA - 95747 
tel: 916.785.0937 
fax: 916.785.1815 
email: swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com 



From: Sachin Thakkar [mailto:sthakkar at vmware.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:37 PM 
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion 


The physical device will be all abstraction in the plugin layer. 

As a whole, the consensus on the call was to follow the model introduced by LBaaS 

Sachin 
----- Original Message -----


From: "Yapeng Wu" <Yapeng.Wu at huawei.com> 
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> 
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:45:33 AM 
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion 

Nachi, 

I have one question regarding of the page 3 in the slide. 

The "VPNGW (Physical)" here implies the physical box terminates VPN connection. Does it have to be physical device? Or physical is one of the implementation? 

Thanks, 
yapeng 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:nachi at ntti3.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:59 PM 
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Qunatum] 2nd Quantum VPN discussion 

Hi folks 

I would like to share the result of 2nd Quantum VPN discussion which 
held today on conf call. 

We discussed general model of VPN based on usecase we agreed on the 1st meeting. 
Current consensus is here, but we will continue model discussion on the Summit. 

In the model, each VPN extension will create each own ServiceType, 
and inject it to the Router using Service insertion. 

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LdL0Fy9PpEQXB9q_c47iJ6gyA1oZn7B6MKbzFyk73tI/edit#slide=id.p 

https://etherpad.openstack.org/HavanaVPNaaS 

Thanks 
Nachi NTT 

_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 

_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 

_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130412/f5417111/attachment.html>