Open Stack

+1 for one processor format ("cores": 6, "threads": 2, "sockets": 2), since it's topolonogy.

Also I'd suggest to get a clear definition of the cpu_info. Currently it's too libvirt specific. For example, the "features" field does not list all features of host processor, instead, it only list features not defined in the corresponding "model" section in libvirt's cpu_maps.xml.

Thanks
--jyh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis Fernandez Alvarez [mailto:luis.fernandez.alvarez at cern.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:02 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] - cpu_info format for hypervisor stats
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm preparing a new patch in order to provide cpu_info in the stats of HyperV
> Compute driver, but I didn't find any spec related to the format, so I took the
> format from the KVM driver.
> 
> I was also wondering whether the way KVM driver is fetching the data is the
> most appropriate. It shows it about one processor, and not the total... I don't
> know what's better...
> 
> {"vendor": "GenuineIntel", "model": "Intel(R) Xeon(R)
> CPU           L5640  @ 2.27GHz", "arch": "x64", "topology": {"cores":
> 6, "threads": 2, "sockets": 2}}
> OR
> {"vendor": "GenuineIntel", "model": "Intel(R) Xeon(R)
> CPU           L5640  @ 2.27GHz", "arch": "x64", "topology": {"cores":
> 12, "threads": 24, "sockets": 2}}
> 
> Do you have any suggestion related to the format and the proper way of
> reporting?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Luis.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev