Open Stack

On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Chuck Short wrote:

> On 12-11-19 06:40 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com <mailto:mordred at inaugust.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    I think these are orthogonal. In general I believe we're in
>>    agreement that we should be targetting the same version of pep8,
>>    and that we should pin that version early in the cycle. However we
>>    install that version of pep8 is a different argument.
>> 
>> 
>> Targeting the same version of pep8 is only part of the problem, we would also need to agree on what rules to ignore. For example:
>> 
>> glance (pep8 1.3.3) ignores: E125,E126,E711,E712
>> nova (pep8 1.2) ignores: E12,E711,E721
>> keystone (pep8 1.3.3) ignores: ---
> 
> Is there a reason why these were ignored?

I just ran glance's pep8 check without ignoring any errors, and it appears most of them are just arbitrary spacing. I'll attempt to minimize the number of pep8 violations we ignore.