Open Stack

On 11/15/2012 05:19 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>> 2. By altering the definition of "Core" in this manner I think a reevaluation of the makeup of the Technical Committee has to go hand-in-hand. As Thierry mentioned in the TC meeting discussion, making the TC 100% elected seats (dropping the guaranteed seats for "Core Project" PTLs) would be one avenue for addressing the imbalance in the new definition.
> 
> Agreed, though I think we can address this issue after we are done with
> the incubation/core one. Ideally the solution for this would also
> address preventively the issue of committee size inflation. I see two
> options:
> 
> 1- have all 13 seats directly-elected
> 2- have all 13 seats directly-elected, but with a minimum of 8 seats to
> be held by "Services" projects PTLs
> 
> I personally prefer option (1). That said, option (2) preserves the
> current ratio of PTLs vs. non-PTLs, so it's a bit less disruptive.

Option 1 seems fine to me.  It's nice and simple.  My guess is that the
PTLs are incredibly likely to be at the top of the vote anyway, so I
don't think the general makeup of the TC would change.

-- 
Russell Bryant