[openstack-dev] The future of Incubation and Core - a motion
Jay Pipes
jaypipes at gmail.com
Wed Nov 14 21:59:18 UTC 2012
On 11/14/2012 10:21 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com
> How does this update sound?
>
> The concepts of "what is core" and "what is in OpenStack" have been
> conflated until now. The TC cares far more about the process for new
> projects to be included in the coordinated release than it cares about
> which projects are required to be used by providers in order to access
> the trademark.
>
> We would like to take an inclusive but measured approach to accepting
> new OpenStack projects. We should evaluate any given proposed project
> on a well defined set of criteria like whether it embraces our values
> and processes, is useful to OpenStack users, well integrated with
> other projects and represents a sensible broadening of the scope of
> OpenStack.
>
> We see Incubation as a trial period where promising projects have the
> opportunity to demonstrate their suitability for inclusion in our
> coordinated releases.
>
> We see the term "Core OpenStack Project" in section 4.1.b of the
> bylaws as being solely related to trademark guidelines. The Foundation
> should simply maintain a list of projects required for trademark
> usage. We would be happy for that list to be called "Core Projects"
> or for a new name to be chosen to describe that list.
>
>
> I like it, and I think it accurately reflects what was discussed earlier.
Agreed.
-jay
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list