Open Stack

On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 10:42 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> OK, let's try to summarize the different views so far:
> 
> 1. core+supported (russellb)
> Let Core be anything you want (required set, necessary set...), but have
> a Supported category for everything that is a positive addition to
> OpenStack.
> 
> 2. Product core (gabrielhurley)
> Do not have an intermediary category which could carry more duties than
> rights, but have an inclusive definition of Core that would include
> necessary/recommended projects.
> 
> 3. Required core (mtaylor)
> Same as "product core", + make all the core stuff a required use if you
> are to call yourself an "OpenStack cloud"
> 
> 4. IaaS core (notmyname)
> Do not have an intermediary category, and have Core only include pure
> IaaS projects.

As I said, I think we're discussing two things - "vision for our
coordinated release" and "requirements for use of the trademark" - it'd
be interesting to figure out what the four views are saying about those
two issues.

I'm not sure I fully understand peoples' views enough to summarize that,
but ...

On the vision for the coordinated release:

 1. core+supported (russellb)
 Very inclusive criteria for inclusion.
 
 2. Product core (gabrielhurley)
 3. Required core (mtaylor)
 More exclusive criteria for inclusion.

 4. IaaS core (notmyname)
 Very exclusive criteria for inclusion.

Cheers,
Mark.