On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Julien Danjou <julien at danjou.info> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06 2012, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > In the changeset comments you mentioned that this would break existing > > tools looking for the "exists" events, and that's a good point. It looks > > like you and Julien are proposing using "volume.usage" instead of > > "volume.exists". I'm not sure that's quite the right description of the > > purpose of these events, but I don't have a better suggestion, so I can > > live with it. :-) > > I can too. My only suggestion was to rename current 'exists' to > 'existed' and use 'exists' for real-time notification. I think that > wouldn't break existing tools or at least not completely? > It would mean those tools get the same events more often. Whether or not that breaks them depends on how often they are expecting to see the events. Do we know anything about these tools? Doug > > -- > Julien Danjou > ;; Free Software hacker & freelance > ;; http://julien.danjou.info > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20121107/306c2e99/attachment.html>