Open Stack

On 11/06/2012 02:45 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 12:38 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 09:47 +0200, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> The change is cool and understood. My concern here is that if someone
>>> has deployed Folsom, when they upgrade to Grizzly then the code will be
>>> broken. In the original configuration the the entry was:
>>> notification_driver =quantum.openstack.common.notifier.rabbit_notifier
>>> This has now been changed to:
>>> notification_driver =quantum.openstack.common.notifier.rpc_notifier
>>> Is this something that needs to be taken care of internally by Quantum
>>> or something across OpenStack?
>> Yeah, it would be nice if we had support for the Folsom configuration
>>
>> If we used entry points for loading these drivers, we could set up an
>> alias like in this proposed patch:
>>
>>    https://review.openstack.org/15030
> I filed a bug:
>
>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1075536
>
> Mark.
>
Thanks!