Open Stack

On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 12:38 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 09:47 +0200, Gary Kotton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The change is cool and understood. My concern here is that if someone 
> > has deployed Folsom, when they upgrade to Grizzly then the code will be 
> > broken. In the original configuration the the entry was:
> > notification_driver =quantum.openstack.common.notifier.rabbit_notifier
> > This has now been changed to:
> > notification_driver =quantum.openstack.common.notifier.rpc_notifier
> > Is this something that needs to be taken care of internally by Quantum 
> > or something across OpenStack?
> 
> Yeah, it would be nice if we had support for the Folsom configuration
> 
> If we used entry points for loading these drivers, we could set up an
> alias like in this proposed patch:
> 
>   https://review.openstack.org/15030

I filed a bug:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1075536

Mark.