Another question. What is the main motivation behind this proposal? If all contents fit into "contributor", "contributor" directory just will add another extra path. 2018年10月28日(日) 19:27 Akihiro Motoki <amotoki@gmail.com>:
Basically +1. I would like to raise a question whether it makes sense to move all contents to contributor/. Some contents are for the infra and/or i18n admin. They might fit into admin/. The i18n repo is different from other repositories, so the categories of contributor, admin, and user might be different. At least I believe our current contents should be categorized.
Thought?
2018年10月28日(日) 2:06 Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com>:
Hello team,
I18n contributor guide ( https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/ ) is based on rst files in http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/doc/source folder, but the folder structure is different from other project documents after project document migration [1].
How about moving rst files except index.rst into "contributor" folder like [2] to follow project document structure?
With many thanks,
/Ian
[1]
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migrat... [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/tree/doc/source/
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n