Another question.
What is the main motivation behind this proposal?
If all contents fit into "contributor", "contributor" directory just will add another extra path.

2018年10月28日(日) 19:27 Akihiro Motoki <amotoki@gmail.com>:
Basically +1.
I would like to raise a question whether it makes sense to move all contents to contributor/.
Some contents are for the infra and/or i18n admin. They might fit into admin/.
The i18n repo is different from other repositories, so the categories of contributor, admin, and user might be different.
At least I believe our current contents should be categorized.

Thought?

2018年10月28日(日) 2:06 Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com>:
Hello team,

I18n contributor guide ( https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/ ) is
based on rst files in
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/doc/source folder, but
the folder structure is different from
other project documents after project document migration [1].

How about moving rst files except index.rst into "contributor" folder
like [2]
to follow project document structure?


With many thanks,

/Ian

[1]
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html#proposed-change
[2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/tree/doc/source/

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-I18n mailing list
OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n