[tc] Weekly update
Hello friends,
Here's what need attention for the OpenStack TC this week:
1. We should ensure we have two TC members focusing on next cycle goal selection process. Only Ghanshyam is dealing with this, and we must help him on the way! Any volunteers? Thanks again gmann for working on that.
2. Jimmy McArthur sent us the results of the OpenStack User survey on the ML [1]. We currently haven't analyzed the information yet. Any volunteer to analyse the information (in order to extract action items) is welcomed. It would be great if we could discuss this at our next official meeting, or at least discuss the next steps.
3. Our next meeting date will be the Thursday 10 October. I will be travelling that day, so it would be nice to have a volunteer to host the meeting. For that, our next meeting agenda needs clarifications. It would be great if you could update the agenda (please also write if your absent) on the wiki [2], so that I can send the invite to the ML. I will send the invite on Thursday.
4. We still haven't finished the conversationg about naming releases. There are a few new ideas floated around, so we should maybe drop the current process to take count of the newly proposed ideas (The large cities lists proposed by Nate, the movie quotes proposed by Thierry [9])? Alternatively, if we can't find consensus, should we just entrust the release naming process to the release team?
5. We should decide to deprecate or not the PowerVMStackers team [3] and move it as a SIG. The votes don't reflect this.
Thank you everyone!
[1]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009501...
[2]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [3]: https://review.opendev.org/680438 [4]: https://review.opendev.org/680985 [5]: https://review.opendev.org/681260 [6]: https://review.opendev.org/681480 [7]: https://review.opendev.org/681924 [8]: https://review.opendev.org/682380 [9]: https://review.opendev.org/684688
On 10/1/2019 7:29 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
Hello friends,
Here's what need attention for the OpenStack TC this week:
- We should ensure we have two TC members focusing on next cycle goal
selection process. Only Ghanshyam is dealing with this, and we must help him on the way! Any volunteers? Thanks again gmann for working on that.
- Jimmy McArthur sent us the results of the OpenStack User survey on
the ML [1]. We currently haven't analyzed the information yet. Any volunteer to analyse the information (in order to extract action items) is welcomed. It would be great if we could discuss this at our next official meeting, or at least discuss the next steps.
JP,
I generally go through this for the Cinder team. Since I will be in there I can review the comments and create an overview/action items before our next meeting.
Jay
- Our next meeting date will be the Thursday 10 October. I will be
travelling that day, so it would be nice to have a volunteer to host the meeting. For that, our next meeting agenda needs clarifications. It would be great if you could update the agenda (please also write if your absent) on the wiki [2], so that I can send the invite to the ML. I will send the invite on Thursday.
- We still haven't finished the conversationg about naming releases.
There are a few new ideas floated around, so we should maybe drop the current process to take count of the newly proposed ideas (The large cities lists proposed by Nate, the movie quotes proposed by Thierry [9])? Alternatively, if we can't find consensus, should we just entrust the release naming process to the release team?
- We should decide to deprecate or not the PowerVMStackers team [3]
and move it as a SIG. The votes don't reflect this.
Thank you everyone!
Jean-Philippe,
I'd be happy to run the meeting for you.
Thanks,
Nate
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:34 AM Jean-Philippe Evrard jean-philippe@evrard.me wrote:
Hello friends,
Here's what need attention for the OpenStack TC this week:
- We should ensure we have two TC members focusing on next cycle goal
selection process. Only Ghanshyam is dealing with this, and we must help him on the way! Any volunteers? Thanks again gmann for working on that.
- Jimmy McArthur sent us the results of the OpenStack User survey on
the ML [1]. We currently haven't analyzed the information yet. Any volunteer to analyse the information (in order to extract action items) is welcomed. It would be great if we could discuss this at our next official meeting, or at least discuss the next steps.
- Our next meeting date will be the Thursday 10 October. I will be
travelling that day, so it would be nice to have a volunteer to host the meeting. For that, our next meeting agenda needs clarifications. It would be great if you could update the agenda (please also write if your absent) on the wiki [2], so that I can send the invite to the ML. I will send the invite on Thursday.
- We still haven't finished the conversationg about naming releases.
There are a few new ideas floated around, so we should maybe drop the current process to take count of the newly proposed ideas (The large cities lists proposed by Nate, the movie quotes proposed by Thierry [9])? Alternatively, if we can't find consensus, should we just entrust the release naming process to the release team?
- We should decide to deprecate or not the PowerVMStackers team [3]
and move it as a SIG. The votes don't reflect this.
Thank you everyone!
[1]:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009501...
Ah, never mind, I did not notice that asettle already volunteered. Apologies!
Nate
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:47 AM Nate Johnston nate.johnston@redhat.com wrote:
Jean-Philippe,
I'd be happy to run the meeting for you.
Thanks,
Nate
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:34 AM Jean-Philippe Evrard < jean-philippe@evrard.me> wrote:
Hello friends,
Here's what need attention for the OpenStack TC this week:
- We should ensure we have two TC members focusing on next cycle goal
selection process. Only Ghanshyam is dealing with this, and we must help him on the way! Any volunteers? Thanks again gmann for working on that.
- Jimmy McArthur sent us the results of the OpenStack User survey on
the ML [1]. We currently haven't analyzed the information yet. Any volunteer to analyse the information (in order to extract action items) is welcomed. It would be great if we could discuss this at our next official meeting, or at least discuss the next steps.
- Our next meeting date will be the Thursday 10 October. I will be
travelling that day, so it would be nice to have a volunteer to host the meeting. For that, our next meeting agenda needs clarifications. It would be great if you could update the agenda (please also write if your absent) on the wiki [2], so that I can send the invite to the ML. I will send the invite on Thursday.
- We still haven't finished the conversationg about naming releases.
There are a few new ideas floated around, so we should maybe drop the current process to take count of the newly proposed ideas (The large cities lists proposed by Nate, the movie quotes proposed by Thierry [9])? Alternatively, if we can't find consensus, should we just entrust the release naming process to the release team?
- We should decide to deprecate or not the PowerVMStackers team [3]
and move it as a SIG. The votes don't reflect this.
Thank you everyone!
[1]:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009501...
participants (3)
-
Jay Bryant
-
Jean-Philippe Evrard
-
Nate Johnston