On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:45 AM Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> wrote:
On 2/26/24 16:12, thywyn@hotmail.com wrote:
And since it was brought up... I am also a newb with commiting to opensource and the whole opendev/gerrit thing is certainly mouch more daunting compared to contributing to projects on Github as an example.
I very much hate the Github workflow, and prefer opendev's Gerrit.
Github is - clik, click, click ... wait ... click - git clone ... - git commit -a - git push - clik, click, click ... wait ... click
gh pr list gh pr checkout ID gh pr comment gh pr create --title "Fix a bug" --body "Squash that thing" gh pr review gh pr merge That said, I completely agree that github *culture* promotes untidy branches with bare commit messages. I wouldn't say that opendev culture can't be transplanted to the github platform; but it would be an uphill battle against expectations contributors have built around what it means to "contribute on github".
It's so annoying compared to: - git clone ... - git commit -a - git review
It's a *FACT*: git review is a way more efficient.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)