On 2/26/24 16:12, thywyn@hotmail.com wrote:
> And since it was brought up... I am also a newb with commiting to
> opensource and the whole opendev/gerrit thing is certainly mouch more
> daunting compared to contributing to projects on Github as an example.
I very much hate the Github workflow, and prefer opendev's Gerrit.
Github is
- clik, click, click ... wait ... click
- git clone ...
- git commit -a
- git push
- clik, click, click ... wait ... click
gh pr list
gh pr checkout ID
gh pr comment
gh pr create --title "Fix a bug" --body "Squash that thing"
gh pr review
gh pr merge
That said, I completely agree that github *culture* promotes untidy branches with bare commit messages.
I wouldn't say that opendev culture can't be transplanted to the github platform; but it would be an uphill battle against expectations contributors have built around what it means to "contribute on github".
It's so annoying compared to:
- git clone ...
- git commit -a
- git review
It's a *FACT*: git review is a way more efficient.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)