Hi Jim, Jim Rollenhagen <jim@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:05 PM Paul Belanger <pabelanger@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 08:48:10PM +0200, Roman Gorshunov wrote:
Hello Jim, team,
I'm from Airship project. I agree with archival of Github mirrors of repositories. One small suggestion: could we have project descriptions adjusted to point to the new location of the source code repository, please? E.g. "The repo now lives at opendev.org/x/y".
This is something important to keep in mind from infra side, once the repo is read-only, we lose the ability to use the API to change it.
From manage-projects.py POV, we can update the description before flipping the archive bit without issues, just need to make sure we have the ordering correct.
Agree this is a good idea.
Just checking you saw my reply to the same email from Paul? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/005846.html
There's been no objections to this plan for some time now.
I might be missing some context, but I *think* my email could be interpreted as an objection based on the reasons listed in it. Also, the understanding I took away from the PTG session was that there was consensus *not* to archive repos, but rather to ensure that mirroring and redirects are set up properly. However I am of course very willing to be persuaded otherwise. Please could you take a look at that mail and let us know what you think? Thanks! Adam