- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

How to assign an ip-address to a server on creation
by Nine, Harmon S 27 May '24

27 May '24

Hello. I'm using the openstack connection api in python to create a server. The server is getting created, but the "create_server" call is not assigning the ip-address to the server that is specified in the call. flavor_id = 'ed88b5d6-150d-4715-8de0-8a2df0a1746a' image_id = '399ae60e-7f73-476e-aad7-13aebcad84a1' networks = [{'uuid': '978ebb40-8ee4-4c0b-932e-83dce7e182dd'}] ip_addresses =[{'subnet_id': '978ebb40-8ee4-4c0b-932e-83dce7e182dd', 'ip_address': '10.0.0.153'}] # also tried ip_addresses = ['10.0.0.153'] instance = conn.compute.create_server( name='testmachine', flavor_id=flavor_id, image_id=image_id, ips=ip_addresses, networks=network_uuid_list, key_name='key_name' ) What is the format of the "ips" argument? Are there other arguments that need to be specified? Thanks for any help you can provide 🙂 -- Harmon

3 5

[kolla][OpenstackAnsible] 2024.1 Caracal cycle-trailing release deadline reminder
by Herve Beraud 27 May '24

27 May '24

Hello teams with trailing projects, The 2024.1 Caracal cycle-trailing release deadline is next week [1], and all projects following the cycle-trailing release model must release their 2024.1 Caracal deliverables by June 6th, 2024. The following trailing projects haven't been released yet for 2024.1 Caracal, convenience patches have been proposed: OSA team's deliverables: - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/919484 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/919483 Kolla team's deliverables: - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/919486 This is just a friendly reminder to allow you to release these projects in time. Please, ensure to provide feedback or to update these patches before the deadline. Do not hesitate to ping us if you have any questions or concerns. [1] https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html#d-cycle-trail Thanks, -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/

1 0

[nova][scheduler] nova scheduler to balance vms more randomly
by Satish Patel 27 May '24

27 May '24

Folks, I have noticed when I spin up a bunch of vms then they all go to the same hypervisor until it runs out of resources. I can understand that it's trying to fill the hypervisor before it picks the next one. But it's kind of dangerous behavior. For example one customer created 3 vms to build a mysql galera cluster and all those 3 nodes endup on the same hypervisor (This is dangerous). I would like openstack to pick the hypervisor more randomly if resources are available in the pool instead of trying to fill the hypervisor. How do I change that behavior? ( There is a feature called affinity but again I would like nova to place vm more randomly instead shaving all to a single node). I am not an expert in scheduler logic so please educate me if I am missing something here.

5 5

Difficulty Create/Upload Images
by Cakra Wirabuana 24 May '24

24 May '24

Hi everyone, I have a difficulty when creating image. I have downloaded the file with both .img and .iso formats and I have tried various format options (QCOW2, RAW, ISO, etc) but it still fails and a notification appears as in the image I attached to this email. Does anyone know the cause of this and what is the solution? If it turns out that I have to create an image via CLI, how do I do it? I am using Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS. Thank you, Cakra Wirabuana [image: image.png]

2 1

[openstack][magnum] Error with QueuePool limit of size
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 23 May '24

23 May '24

Hello. I am using Magnum 18.0.0.0rc2.dev2 in OPS 2024.01 with Magnum-Cluster-API(0.17.0) from Vexxhost. But I have these errors as: Ignore error [QueuePool limit of size 1 overflow 50 reached, connection timed out, timeout 30.00 (Background on this error at: https://sqlalche.me/e/14/3o7r) when syncing up cluster status.: sqlalchemy.exc.TimeoutError: QueuePool limit of size 1 overflow 50 reached, connection timed out, timeout 30.00 Full log is in: https://paste.sh/gWg28T2s#zctJBJsW34bX9pG705VR5PMP Thank you. Nguyen Huu Khoi

2 2

[trove][tc] Next step on leaderless project Trove
by Ghanshyam Mann 23 May '24

23 May '24

Hi Wu, This is regarding the Trove project leader assignment. We saw your late candidacy for Trove PTL[1]. The TC has listed Trove as a late candidacy project[2] and can consider a PTL appointment. If you are still interested in serving as Trove PTL, please propose the PTL appointment request to TC. Example: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/915108 [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/910488 [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2024.2-leaderless#L99 -gmann

1 1

cpu steal
by Gk Gk 22 May '24

22 May '24

Hi, If we create pinned vms, is there a chance of cpu steal in this scenario ? If so what could be the reason since we have dedicated cpu assigned to the guest ? What would happen if it is a physical cpu, directly assigned to the vm ? Does it experience cpu steal in this case as well ? Thanks GK

2 2

[Glance] Cancelling Weekly Meeting (23rd May)
by Pranali Deore 22 May '24

22 May '24

Hello, Since I won't be able to chair tomorrow's meeting due to my PTO, cancelling the same. See you next week! Thanks, Pranali Deore

1 0

[kolla-ansible] How to pin pip3 module in kolla-ansible
by Satish Patel 22 May '24

22 May '24

Folks, I have deployed kolla-ansible using public images so far everything is good until I hit this bug [1] requests pip module had a minor bug. Now my question is if I want to pin requests==2.31.0 version in kolla-ansible then what file should I be adding to the pin version? This is not an image building related module because it deployed on a metal host so nothing to do with building kolla images. It's a pure docker issue. 1. https://github.com/docker/docker-py/pull/3257

3 3

[tc][all][sahara] Retiring the Sahara project
by Ghanshyam Mann 21 May '24

21 May '24

Hello everyone, As you might know, the Sahara project is not active and was marked 'inactive' since 2024.1 cycle[1]. In this cycle also, this project is leaderless[2] and no maintainer stepped up to maintain it. As discussed in the Leaderless project etherpad[2], the next step is to retire the project. I'm sending this email to propose the Sahara retirement and based on the response, I will proceed next. [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inact… [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2024.2-leaderless#L72 -gmann

3 9