- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[openstack-helm] would like to discuss review turnaround time
by Jaesuk Ahn 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

Dear all, There has been several patch sets getting sparse reviews. Since some of authors wrote these patch sets are difficult to join IRC meeting due to time and language constraints, I would like to pass some of their voice, and get more detail feedback from core reviewers and other devs via ML. I fully understand core reviewers are quite busy and believe they are doing their best efforts. period! However, I sometimes feel that turnaround time for some of patch sets are really long. I would like to hear opinion from others and suggestions on how to improve this. It can be either/both something each patch set owner need to do more, or/and it could be something we as a openstack-helm project can improve. For instance, it could be influenced by time differences, lack of irc presence, or anything else. etc. I really would like to find out there are anything we can improve together. I would like to get any kind of advise on the following. - sometimes, it is really difficult to get core reviewers' comments or reviews. I routinely put the list of patch sets on irc meeting agenda, however, there still be a long turnaround time between comments. As a result, it usually takes a long time to process a patch set, does sometimes cause rebase as well. - Having said that, I would like to have any advise on what we need to do more, for instance, do we need to be in irc directly asking each patch set to core reviewers? do we need to put core reviewers' name when we push patch set? etc. - Some of patch sets are being reviewed and merged quickly, and some of patch sets are not. I would like to know what makes this difference so that I can tell my developers how to do better job writing and communicating patch sets. There are just some example patch sets currently under review stage. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603971/ >> this ps has been discussed for its contents and scope. Cloud you please add if there is anything else we need to do other than wrapping some of commit message? 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/633456/ >> this is simple fix. how can we make core reviewer notice this patch set so that they can quickly view? 3. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625803/ >> we have been getting feedbacks and questions on this patch set, that has been good. but round-trip time for the recent comments takes a week or more. because of that delay (?), the owner of this patch set needed to rebase this one often. Will this kind of case be improved if author engages more on irc channel or via mailing list to get feedback rather than relying on gerrit reviews? Frankly speaking, I don't know if this is a real issue or just way it is. I just want to pass some of voice from our developers, and really would like to hear what others think and find a better way to communicate. Thanks you. -- *Jaesuk Ahn*, Ph.D. Software Labs, SK Telecom

2 3

how to define multiple aliases
by Manuel Sopena Ballesteros 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

Dear openstack community, I am trying to setup pci passthrough for multiple devices types but I am getting an error while creating a new vm. This is my pci section in nova.conf compute node [pci] passthrough_whitelist = [{ "vendor_id": "10de", "product_id": "1db1" }, { "vendor_id": "15b3", "product_id": "1016" }] alias = { "vendor_id":"10de", "product_id":"1db1", "device_type":"type-PCI", "name":"nv_v100" } alias = { "vendor_id":"15b3", "product_id":"1016", "device_type":"type-VF", "name":"mlnx_connectx4" } I also tried this [pci] passthrough_whitelist = [{ "vendor_id": "10de", "product_id": "1db1" }, { "vendor_id": "15b3", "product_id": "1016" }] alias = [{ "vendor_id":"10de", "product_id":"1db1", "device_type":"type-PCI", "name":"nv_v100" }, { "vendor_id":"15b3", "product_id":"1016", "device_type":"type-VF", "name":"mlnx_connectx4" }] And this is the error I am getting when I try to create a new vm: # openstack server create --flavor sriov.small --image centos7.5-image --availability-zone nova:zeus-59.localdomain vm-sriov-test PCI alias mlnx_connectx4 is not defined (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-aebb2d05-a557-428b-b2c6-090c16dc7c76) how can I setup multiple aliases for different devices? Thank you very much NOTICE Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message and any attachments are intended for the addressee named and may contain legally privileged/confidential/copyright information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read, use, disclose, copy or distribute this communication. If you have received this message in error please notify us at once by return email and then delete both messages. We accept no liability for the distribution of viruses or similar in electronic communications. This notice should not be removed.

3 3

Last day for TC candidate nominations
by Jeremy Stanley 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

A quick reminder that we are in the last hours for TC candidate announcements. Nominations are open until Feb 19, 2019 23:45 UTC. If you want to stand for TC, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your nomination has been submitted to the openstack/election repository and approved by election officials. Thank you, [1] http://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy -- Jeremy Stanley

1 1

[tripleo][openstack-ansible] collaboration on os_tempest role update XI - Feb 19, 2019
by Chandan kumar 19 Feb '19

19 Feb '19

Hello, Here is the 11th update (Feb 13 to Feb 19, 2019) on collaboration on os_tempest[1] role between TripleO and OpenStack-Ansible projects. Summary: This week was still a calm week. we unblocked the os_heat CI, thanks to mnaser, odyssey4me and guilhermesp. In os_tempest we can also disable the router ping and run mistral tempest tests. Default zero disk flavor to RULE_ADMIN_API in Stein [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603910/] patch in nova broke python-tempestconf, but os_tempest was working fine as it has already using DISK=1. Now everything is fixed Things got merged: os_tempest * Add tempest_service_available_mistral with distro packages - https://review.openstack.org/635180 * Add option to disable router ping - https://review.openstack.org/636211 python-tempestconf * Update image flavor to have some disk - https://review.openstack.org/637679 os_heat * Fixed the egg name of heat to openstack_heat - https://review.openstack.org/635518 Things in progress: os_tempest * Ensure stackviz wheel build is isolated - https://review.openstack.org/637503 * Added tempest.conf for heat_plugin - https://review.openstack.org/632021 * Use the correct heat tests - https://review.openstack.org/630695 * Added dependency of os_tempest role - https://review.openstack.org/632726 * Revert "Only init a workspace if doesn't exists" - https://review.openstack.org/637801 TripleO: * Reuse the validate-tempest skip list in os_tempest - https://review.openstack.org/634380 Note: os_tempest tripleo CI got broken, we are working on fixing this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1816552 Upcoming week: * Complete heat support in os_tempest Here is the 10th update [2]. Have queries, Feel free to ping us on #tripleo or #openstack-ansible channel. Links: [1.] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest [2.] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002608… Thanks, Chandan Kumar

1 0

[Openstack][Heat] service times out 504
by Florian Engelmann 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hi all, - Version: heat-base-archive-stable-rocky - Commit: Ica99cec6765d22d7ee2262e2d402b2e98cb5bd5e I have a fresh openstack deployment (kolla-Ansible). Everything but Heat is working fine. When I do a webrequest (either horizon or curl) on the openstack heat endpoint (internal or public), I just get nothing and after a while, it times out with a 500 http error. root@xxxx-kolla-xxxx:~# curl -vvv http://10.10.10.10:8004/v1/e7f405fb2b7b4b029dfc48e06920eb92 * Trying 10.x.y.z * Connected to heat.xxxxxxxx (10.x.x.x.) port 8004 (#0) > GET /v1/e7f405fb2b7b4b029dfc48e06920eb92 HTTP/1.1 > Host: heat.xxxxxxxxx:8004 > User-Agent: curl/7.47.0 > Accept: */* > < HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error < Content-Type: application/json < Content-Length: 4338 < X-Openstack-Request-Id: req-46afc474-682b-4938-8777-b3b4b6fcb973 < Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:08:04 GMT < {"explanation": "The server has either erred or is incapable of performing the requested operation.", "code": 500, In the heat_api log I see the request coming through, but it seems that there is just no reply. 2019-02-15 14:16:40.047 25 DEBUG heat.api.middleware.version_negotiation [-] Processing request: GET / Accept: <no header in request> process_request /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/heat/api/middleware/version_negotiation.py:50 2019-02-15 14:16:40.048 25 INFO eventlet.wsgi.server [-] 10.x.y.z - - [15/Feb/2019 14:16:40] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 300 327 0.001106 Should the api give some output when I do a http request? Any hints? Thanks a lot, its quite urgent.. Built 11.0.0 and current rocky-stable (11.0.0.1dev), same on both versions. ## with a horizon request (just click on Project -> Compute -> Orchestration -> Stacks 2019-02-15 14:22:22.250 22 DEBUG heat.api.middleware.version_negotiation [-] Processing request: GET /v1/beb568af3781471d94c3623805946ca3/stacks Accept: application/json process_request /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/heat/api/middleware/version_negotiation.py:50 2019-02-15 14:22:22.250 22 DEBUG heat.api.middleware.version_negotiation [-] Matched versioned URI. Version: 1.0 process_request /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/heat/api/middleware/version_negotiation.py:65 2019-02-15 14:22:23.003 22 DEBUG eventlet.wsgi.server [req-663d17e3-7e41-4c9e-a30a-a43ef18cf056 - - - - -] (22) accepted ('10.xxx.xxx.xxx', 51084) server /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py:883 2019-02-15 14:22:23.004 22 DEBUG heat.api.middleware.version_negotiation [-] Processing request: GET / Accept: <no header in request> process_request /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/heat/api/middleware/version_negotiation.py:50 Best regards, Flo

2 1

[cinder] questions about release cycles
by Kulazhenkov, Yury 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hi all, I'm currently maintain VxFlex OS(ScaleIO) cinder driver. Driver require some changes to support future VxFlex OS release. We want to add this changes to Stein release and if it possible backport them to old supported releases. I have couple questions: 1. Is it still possible to submit patches which extend driver functionality in Stein release cycle? If such changes are still possible, then I have another question: I already submitted patch that renames ScaleIO driver to VxFlex OS (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634397/) Is it possible that this patch will be merged during Stein release cycle? In other words, I'm interesting, should I prepare "new feature" patch based on this "renaming" patch (as patch chain) or it will be better to prepare separate patch based on master branch state? 2. Is it possible to add new driver features (changes for compatibility, to be more accurate) for currently supported Openstack releases? Any rules, policy or special workflow for that? Thanks, Yury

2 1

Re: [openstack-community] Help on OpenStack-Kolla
by Eduardo Gonzalez 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Openstack-dicuss is the ML, what area need help? Regards El mar., 19 feb. 2019 a las 8:24, Vlad Blando (<vblando(a)morphlabs.com>) escribió: > Hi, > > Is there a mailing list that tackles issues specific to openstack-kolla? > > Regards, > > /Vlad > ᐧ > _______________________________________________ > Community mailing list > Community(a)lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community >

1 0

[dev][keystone] Keystone Team Update - Week of 11 February 2019
by Colleen Murphy 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

# Keystone Team Update - Week of 11 February 2019 ## News ### Blueprints Overhaul After someone inquired about a very old Launchpad blueprint that was not aligned with reality, we started a campaign to clean up all of the keystone blueprints. Lance described the proposed plan[1] which is to stop using Launchpad blueprints for tracking feature work and to consolidate everything into specs and RFE bug reports. The plan is also in discussion in our spec template[2]. Once we have our backlog cleaned up, it will hopefully be a little more straightforward to port all of our tracked work into Storyboard when the time comes. There are also quite a few open blueprints that we need to discuss as a team to reaffirm whether they are moving in the right direction and still worthwhile[3]. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002672… [2] https://review.openstack.org/625282 [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-blueprint-cleanup ### OpenStack User Survey Since the Foundation is working on this year's user survey, we talked about what we want included on it[4]. We've found the current keystone question is not really detailed enough to give us concrete feedback, but unfortunately we're limited to two questions. We decided to add one additional question[5] and the Foundation has also offered to help collect more fine-grained feedback via a Surveymonkey survey. [4] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2019/keystone.2019-02-12-1… [5] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/%23openstack-k… ## Recently Merged Changes Search query: https://bit.ly/2pquOwT We merged 16 changes this week. ## Changes that need Attention Search query: https://bit.ly/2RLApdA There are 68 changes that are passing CI, not in merge conflict, have no negative reviews and aren't proposed by bots. ## Bugs This week we opened 6 new bugs and closed 3. Bugs opened (6) Bug #1815539 (keystone:High) opened by Guang Yee https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/181553 Bug #1815771 (keystone:Medium) opened by Jose Castro Leon https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1815771 Bug #1815810 (keystone:Low) opened by Drew Freiberger https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1815810 Bug #1815966 (keystone:Wishlist) opened by Lance Bragstad https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1815966 Bug #1815971 (keystone:Wishlist) opened by Lance Bragstad https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1815971 Bug #1815972 (keystone:Wishlist) opened by Lance Bragstad https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1815972 Bugs fixed (3) Bug #1804446 (keystone:Medium) fixed by Lance Bragstad https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1804446 Bug #1805372 (keystone:Medium) fixed by Lance Bragstad https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1805372 Bug #1813739 (keystonemiddleware:Undecided) fixed by Yang Youseok https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystonemiddleware/+bug/1813739 ## Milestone Outlook https://releases.openstack.org/stein/schedule.html Feature freeze as well as final client release are both in 3 weeks. Non-client release deadline is in two weeks, which means changes needed for keystonemiddleware, keystoneauth, and the oslo libraries need to be proposed and reviewed ASAP. ## Help with this newsletter Help contribute to this newsletter by editing the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-team-newsletter

3 5

[neutron] Bug deputy report week of February 11th
by Brian Haley 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hi, I was Neutron bug deputy last week. Below is a short summary about reported bugs. -Brian Critical bugs ------------- None High bugs --------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815585 - Floating IP status failed to transition to DOWN in neutron-tempest-plugin-scenario-linuxbridge - intermittent gate failure * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815618 - cannot update qos rule - Bence took ownership, triaging * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815629 - api and rpc worker defaults are problematic - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/636363 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815758 - Error in ip_lib.get_devices_info() retrieving veth interface info - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636652/ * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815797 - rpc_response_max_timeout" configuration variable not present in fullstack tests - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636719/ - Duplicate - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1816443 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815912 - [OVS] exception message when retrieving bridge-id is not present - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636963/ * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815913 - DVR can not work with multiple routers on single network. - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636953/ * https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816239 - Functional test test_router_processing_pool_size failing - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637544/ Medium bugs ----------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815609 - [fwaas] devstack plugin fails if ML2/OVS is not use - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636340/ * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815871 - neutron-server api don't shutdown gracefully - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636855/ Low bugs -------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815600 - "tags" listed in POST in api-ref - bug in docs * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1816395 - L2 Networking with SR-IOV enabled NICs in neutron - bug in docs Wishlist bugs ------------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815498 - Use pyroute2 to check vlan/vxlan in use - Fix proposed - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636296/ * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815933 - [RFE] Allow bulk-tagging of resources - Discussed at drivers meeting 2/15 Invalid bugs ------------ None Further triage required ----------------------- * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815728 - Can delete port attached to VM without Nova noticing - The nova_notifier code should have done this, asked for more info, no answer yet * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1815989 - OVS drops RARP packets by QEMU upon live-migration causes up to 40s ping pause in Rocky - Asked for clarification on issue, Sean Mooney indicated it was os-vif related so added the component.

1 0

[nova] boot from volume with root_gb=0 flavors is not allowed now
by Mohammed Naser 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hi everyone, Just wanted to give a heads up about the change that recently merged in Nova which will affect Train (and current master, for deployment projects). https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603910/ As of that change, Nova will no longer allow you to to create a VM when the root_gb of a flavor is set to 0. This is to avoid a reported security issue which we've found a while ago: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1739646 If you're using devstack, you'll probably be okay as the following change has already fixed it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619319/ However, deployment projects will need to make that adjustment as well as deployers need to plan accordingly (everyone is going to upgrade to Train the day we release, right?) -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost ----------------------------------------------------- D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mnaser(a)vexxhost.com W. http://vexxhost.com

2 1