- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[ops][glance][security] looking for metadefs users
by Abhishek Kekane 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello operators and other people interested in metadefs, The Glance team will be giving the metadefs some love in the Xena development cycle in order to address OSSN-0088 [0]. The people who designed and implemented metadefs are long gone, and in determining how to fix OSSN-0088, we would like to understand how people are actually using them in the wild so we don't restrict them so much as to make them useless. We are looking for an operator who uses metadefs to give us a walkthrough on how you are using them at the Xena (virtual) PTG. We are planning to have this session on 23rd April around 1400 UTC. You can find more details about the same in PTG planning etherpad [1]. We are also willing to meet outside the PTG schedule in case the current scheduled time might be blocking the people. I will also reply to this as a reminder mail once our PTG schedule is final. If you do not use the metadef API for some reason related to its inability to solve a problem, lack of flexibility, or other reasons (but wish you could), we would also like to hear about that. We need to know if the feature is worth fixing and maintaining going forward. And when we say "an operator", we don't mean just one ... ideally, we'd like to have a few real-life use cases to consider. If this is affecting you (as an operator) then you can reach us either by mail or #openstack-glance IRC channel or glance weekly meeting [2] which will be held every Thursday around 1400 UTC. [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OSSN/OSSN-0088 [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-glance-planning [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda Thank you and Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane

6 9

[Multi-arch SIG] Xena PTG
by Rico Lin 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi all As VPTG approaches (PTG will be held April 19th through April 23rd), I reserve a room on 4/20 Tuesday from 07:00-08:00 and 15:00-16:00 (UTC time). Exactly same as meeting schedule. We will use Meetpad this time. Let me know if you have any questions. You can find us on irc #openstack-multi-arch Please put your name in the PTG etherpad [1] if you plan to join. Also putting topic suggestions or comments on is more than welcome. Note: Don't forget to register PTG (for free) on [2]. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-multi-arch-sig [2] PTG Registration: https://april2021-ptg.eventbrite.com *Rico Lin* OIF Board director, OpenSack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair, Heat PTL, Senior Software Engineer@EasyStack *Email: ricolin(a)ricolky.com <ricolin(a)ricolky.com>* *Phone: +886-963-612-021*

1 0

[heat] Xena PTG: same schedule as meeting time (4/21)(2 hours)
by Rico Lin 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi all As VPTG approaches (PTG will be held April 19th through April 23rd), I reserve a room on 4/21 Wed. from 14:00-16:00 (UTC time). We will use Meetpad. this time. Let me know if you have any questions. Please put your name in the PTG etherpad [1] if you plan to join. Also putting topic suggestions or comments on is more than welcome. Note: Don't forget to register PTG (for free) on [2]. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-heat [2] PTG Registration: https://april2021-ptg.eventbrite.com *Rico Lin* OIF Board director, OpenSack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair, Heat PTL, Senior Software Engineer@EasyStack *Email: ricolin(a)ricolky.com <ricolin(a)ricolky.com>* *Phone: +886-963-612-021*

1 0

[manila] [FFE] Request for "Update cephfs drivers to use ceph-mgr" and "create share from snapshot support for CephFS"
by Victoria Martínez de la Cruz 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi, I would like to ask for an FFE for the RFEs "Update cephfs drivers to use ceph-mgr" [0] and "Create share from snapshot support for CephFS" [1] Both RFEs are related. The first one updates the cephfs drivers to use the ceph-mgr interface for all manila operations. This change is required since the library currently used is already deprecated and it is expected to be removed in the next Ceph release. The second one leverages the previous one and adds a new functionality available through the ceph-mgr interface which is the create share from snapshot support. We have been working on both features for two cycles already and we could use a few more days to finish the testing. Looking forward to a positive response. Thanks, Victoria [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/update-cephfs-drivers [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/create-share-from-snapshot-ce…

2 1

[masakari] The legacy (client) has been dropped... finally!
by Radosław Piliszek 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello Fellow OpenStackers, The Masakari team is proud to announce that the legacy Masakari client is no more! It has been deprecated since Stein and was less featureful than the OpenStack client plugin that was fully supported for a long time. The OSC plugin is also entirely based on OpenStack SDK. All Masakari client parts are available there. (This applies to Wallaby [version 7.0.0] and later.) -yoctozepto

1 0

[tacker] Xena PTG
by Yasufumi Ogawa 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi, Next vPTG is going to be held 19-23 April. I've prepared etherpad for the PTG[1] and reserved same timeslots as previous, 6-8 am UTC from 20th Apr[2]. Please register from [3] and fill "Attendees" and "Topics" in the etherpad for your proposals. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-xena-ptg [2] https://ethercalc.net/oz7q0gds9zfi [3] https://april2021-ptg.eventbrite.com/ Thanks, Yasufumi

1 0

[TripleO] next irc meeting Tuesday Mar 16 @ 1400 UTC in #tripleo
by Marios Andreou 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Reminder that the next TripleO irc meeting is: ** Tuesday 16 March at 1400 UTC in #tripleo ** ** https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO ** ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items ** Please add anything you want to highlight at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items This can be recently completed things, ongoing review requests, blocking issues, or anything else tripleo you want to share. Our last meeting was on Mar 02nd - you can find the logs there http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2021/tripleo.2021-03-02-14.… Hope you can make it on Tuesday, thanks, marios

1 0

Re: [Release-job-failures] release-post job for openstack/releases for ref refs/heads/master failed
by Thierry Carrez 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

We got two similar release processing failures: > - tag-releases https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/707bb50b4bf645f8903d8ca59b43abbf : FAILURE in 2m 31s This one was an error running the tag-releases post-merge job after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779217 merged. It failed with: Running: git push --dry-run ssh://release@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/tripleo-ipsec.git --all ssh://release@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/tripleo-ipsec.git did not work. Description: Host key verification failed. > - tag-releases https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/655e8980a53c4e829de25f0b8507b5f6 : FAILURE in 2m 57s Similar failure while running the tag-releases post-merge job after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779218 merged. Since this "host key verification failed" error hit tripleo-ipsec three times in a row, I suspect we have something stuck (or we always hit the same cache/worker). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

5 7

[release][OpenstackSDK][masakari] request FFE on OpenstackSDK for python-masakariclient
by Herve Beraud 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello folks, As discussed this morning on #openstack-release the masakari team needs OpenstackSDK changes that haven't been released. They have been merged after the final release [1]. Those aren't landed in OpenstackSDK version 0.54.0 [2]. Here is the delta of changes merged between 0.54.0 and 736f3aa1 ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299) $ git log --no-merges --online 0.54.0..736f3aa16c7ee95eb5a42f28062305c83cfd05e1 736f3aa1 add masakari enabled to segment Only these changes are in the delta. Do you mind if we start releasing a new version 0.55.0 to land these changes and unlock the path of the masakari team? Client library deadline is today. Also this topic opens the door for another discussion. Indeed it's questionable that openstacksdk should follow the early library deadline, for that precise reason. We release python-*client the same time as parent projects so that late features can be taken into account. It seems appropriate that openstacksdk is in the same bucket All those safeguards are a lot less needed now that we move slower and break less things. That could be translated by moving OpenstackSDK from `type: library` [3] to `type: client-library` [4]. Let us know what you think about the FFE. Let's open the discussions about the type shifting. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299 [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/b87ad4371321d5b0dde7ed0b23623… [3] https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#library [4] https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#client-libr… -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC Nominations March 2021 End
by Kendall Nelson 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello! The PTL and TC Nomination period is now over. The official candidate lists for PTLs [0] and TC seats [1] are available on the election website. -- PTL Election Details -- There are 8 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[2], the TC will have to decide how the following projects will proceed: Barbican, Cyborg, Keystone, Mistral, Monasca, Senlin, Zaqar, Zun -- TC Election Details -- There are 0 projects that will have elections. Now begins the campaigning period where candidates and electorate may debate their statements. Polling will start Mar 12, 2021 23:45 UTC. Thank you, -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) & the Election Officials [0] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#xena-ptl-candidates [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#xena-tc-candidates [2] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for…

3 2

Windows vm is not launching from horizon
by Midhunlal Nb 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi all, I successfully installed the openstack rocky version and everything is working properly. ---->Uploaded all images to openstack and I can see all images listed through openstack CLI. +--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------+ | ID | Name | Status | +--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------+ | 1912a80a-1139-4e00-b0d9-e98dc801e54b | CentOS-7-x86_64 active | | 595b928f-8a32-4107-b6e8-fea294d3f7f1 | CentOS-8-x86_64 active| | f531869a-e0ac-4690-8f79-4ff64d284576 | Ubuntu-18.04-x86_64 active| | 7860193b-81bd-4a22-846c-ae3a89117f9d | Ubuntu-20.04-x86_64 active | 1c3a9878-6db3-441e-9a85-73d3bc4a87a7 | cirros active | d321f3a3-08a3-47bf-8f53-6aa46a6a4b52 | windows10 active --->same images I can see through horizon dashboard,but i am not able to launch windows VM from horizon dashboard .Balance all images launching from dashboard. Getting below error; Error: Failed to perform requested operation on instance "windows", the instance has an error status: Please try again later [Error: Build of instance 15a3047d-dfca-4615-9d34-c46764b703ff aborted: Volume 5ca83635-a2fe-458c-9053-cb7a9804156b did not finish being created even after we waited 190 seconds or 61 attempts. And its status is downloading.]. --->I am able to launch windows VM from openstack CLI What is the issue ?why I am not able to launch from dashboard?please help me. Thanks & Regards Midhunlal N B +918921245637

3 2

[neutron] Drivers meeting - agenda for 12.03.2021
by Slawek Kaplonski 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hi, For tomorrow's drivers meeting we have 2 RFEs related to the integration of Neutron with Designate: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1904559 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1918424 I didn't marked them as triaged yet as I'm not really sure what more data we could need in both cases. I hope that we will get some more questions during the meeting so we can at least together triage them :) Of course, please check those RFEs and ask for anything You need there, even before the meeting :) -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[cinder] review priorities for the next few days
by Brian Rosmaita 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Here's the list of cinder and driver features that haven't yet merged: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-wallaby-features Please make reviewing these your top priorities. We'll get back to reviewing bug fixes next week. cheers, brian

2 1

[all][tc] Thoughts on Python 3.7 support
by Pierre Riteau 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello, There have been many patches submitted to drop the Python 3.7 classifier from setup.cfg: https://review.opendev.org/q/%2522remove+py37%2522 The justification is that Wallaby tested runtimes only include 3.6 and 3.8. Most projects are merging these patches, but I've seen a couple of objections from ironic and horizon: - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-ironicclient/+/769044 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/769237 What are the thoughts of the TC and of the overall community on this? Should we really drop these classifiers when there are no corresponding CI jobs, even though more Python versions may well be supported? Best wishes, Pierre Riteau (priteau)

9 13

[release][oslo][monasca][keystone] Moving projects to independent
by Herve Beraud 11 Mar '21

11 Mar '21

Hello teams, We are about to move a couple of projects under the independent release models [1]. Those did not have any change merged over the cycle, we think that it is the right time to transition them to independent. Oslo: - futurist - debtcollector - osprofiler Keystone: - pycadf Monasca: - monasca-statsd Before we push the button we want to give ourselves a last chance to raise the hand if you think that it's an issue. Concerning Oslo's projects we already had a related discussion a few months ago and all participants agreed with that [2]. Please let us know ASAP if you disagree with that choice. Thanks for your attention. [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22move-to-independent%22+(status:open%2… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018527… -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+ Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+ RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0 qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3 B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o =ECSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[election][zun] PTL candidacy for Xena
by ZTE 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Hi! I'd like to propose my candidacy and continue serving as Zun PTL in the Xena cycle. Over the Wallaby release, the Zun team continues to keep the Zun stable and reliable, and also some great works have been done. My goals for the Xena cycle are to continue the progress made in the following areas: * zun-conductor: Add a service called zun-conductor * CRI: Use the CRI interface to get inventory when cri driver configed for Capsule. * Affinity&anti-affinity: Add the affinity and anti-affinity policies to zun. Thank you for taking the time to consider me for Xena PTL. Best regards, Shengqin Feng

1 0

[security][security-sig] No meeting tomorrow March 11th
by Gage Hugo 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

The security sig meeting tomorrow has been cancelled. We will meet again at the regular time next week. Thanks

1 0

[nova][neutron] Can we remove the 'network:attach_external_network' policy check from nova-compute?
by melanie witt 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Hello all, I'm seeking input from the neutron and nova teams regarding policy enforcement for allowing attachment to external networks. Details below. Recently we've been looking at an issue that was reported quite a long time ago (2017) [1] where we have a policy check in nova-compute that controls whether to allow users to attach an external network to their instances. This has historically been a pain point for operators as (1) it goes against convention of having policy checks in nova-api only and (2) setting the policy to anything other than the default requires deploying a policy file change to all of the compute hosts in the deployment. The launchpad bug report mentions neutron refactoring work that was happening at the time, which was thought might make the 'network:attach_external_network' policy check on the nova side redundant. Years have passed since then and customers are still running into this problem, so we are thinking, can this policy check be removed on the nova-compute side now? I did a local test with devstack to verify what the behavior is if we were to remove the 'network:attach_external_network' policy check entirely [2] and found that neutron appears to properly enforce permission to attach to external networks itself. It appears that the enforcement on the neutron side makes the nova policy check redundant. When I tried to boot an instance to attach to an external network, neutron API returned the following: INFO neutron.pecan_wsgi.hooks.translation [req-58fdb103-cd20-48c9-b73b-c9074061998c req-4d68df7e-e0fd-4b1e-9b57-733731123d46 demo demo] POST failed (client error): Tenant 7c60976c662a414cb2661831ff41ee30 not allowed to create port on this network [...] INFO neutron.wsgi [req-58fdb103-cd20-48c9-b73b-c9074061998c req-4d68df7e-e0fd-4b1e-9b57-733731123d46 demo demo] 127.0.0.1 "POST /v2.0/ports HTTP/1.1" status: 403 len: 360 time: 0.1582518 Can anyone from the neutron team confirm whether it would be OK for us to remove our nova-compute policy check for external network attach permission and let neutron take care of the check? And on the nova side, I assume we would need a deprecation cycle before removing the 'network:attach_external_network' policy. If we can get confirmation from the neutron team, is anyone opposed to the idea of deprecating the 'network:attach_external_network' policy in the Wallaby cycle, to be removed in the Xena release? I would appreciate your thoughts. Cheers, -melanie [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1675486 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1675486/comments/4

3 5

[release][heat][ironic][requirements][swift][OpenStackSDK] Cycle With Intermediary Unreleased Deliverables
by Armstrong Foundjem 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Hello! Quick reminder that we'll need a release very soon for a number of deliverables following a cycle-with-intermediary release model but which have not done *any* release yet in the Wallaby cycle: heat-agents ironic-prometheus-exporter ironic-ui ovn-octavia-provider python-openstackclient requirements swift Those should be released ASAP, and in all cases before 22 March, 2021, so that we have a release to include in the final Wallaby release. - Armstrong Foundjem (armstrong)

1 0

[glance] Xena PTG (Apr 19 - 23)
by Abhishek Kekane 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Hello All, Greetings!!! Xena PTG is announced and if you haven't already registered, please do so as soon as possible [1]. I have created a Virtual PTG planning etherpad [2]. Please add your PTG topic in the etherpad [2]. If you feel your topic needs cross project cooperation please note that in the etherpad which other teams are needed. I am planning to reserve time slots for the PTG between 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC. Please let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions with the given time slots. [1] https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-glance-planning Thank you, Abhishek

1 0

[ISSUE]Openstack create VNF instance ERROR
by Jhen-Hao Yu 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Dear Sir, This our testbed: Openstack (stein) + Opendaylight (neon) + ovs (v2.11.1) We have trouble when creating vnf on compute node using OpenStack CLI: #openstack vnf create vnfd1 vnf1 Here are the log message and ovs information. COMPUTE NODE1: nova-compute.log [image: error1.png] [image: list1.png] [image: vsctl1.png] COMPUTE NODE 2: nova-compute.log [image: error2.png] [image: list2.png] [image: vsctl2.png] We don't use DPDK on our Openvswitch. Can anyone give us some advice on this issue? Thanks for helping us. [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=sig…> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=sig…> 03/09/21, 10:20:09 PM

2 2

[neutron] Xena PTG
by Slawek Kaplonski 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Hi, If You plan to attend Neutron sessions during the Xena PTG, please fill in doodle [1] with the time slots which are good for You. Please do that before 19.03.2021 (next Friday) so I will have time to book slots which are the best for most of us. Please also add any topics You want to be discussed to the etherpad [2] [1] https://doodle.com/poll/cc2ste3emzw7ekrh?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-xena-ptg -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

[scientific-sig] IRC meeting today - Jupyter notebook platforms
by Stig Telfer 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Hi All - We have a Scientific SIG meeting today at 1100 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting. Everyone is welcome. Today's agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_SIG#IRC_Meeting_March_10th_2021 We'll be discussing experiences and best practices for providing JupyterHub and Jupyter notebook platforms on OpenStack. Cheers, Stig

1 0

[ISSUE]Openstack create VNF instance error
by Jhen-Hao Yu 10 Mar '21

10 Mar '21

Dear Sir, This our testbed: Openstack (stein) + Opendaylight (neon) + ovs (v2.11.1) We have trouble when creating vnf on compute node using OpenStack CLI: #openstack vnf create vnfd1 vnf1 Here are the log message and ovs information.*COMPUTE NODE1:* nova-compute.log ============================= Attempting claim on node cmp001: memory 2048 MB, disk 15 GB, vcpus 1 CPU Total memory: 7976 MB, used: 6656.00 MB memory limit not specified, defaulting to unlimited Total disk: 96 GB, used: 45.00 GB disk limit not specified, defaulting to unlimited Total vcpu: 4 VCPU, used: 3.00 VCPU vcpu limit not specified, defaulting to unlimited Claim successful on node cmp001 Creating image ERROR vif_plug_ovs.ovsdb.impl_vsctl [req-a514ba2a-7ada-4a35-944e-0c861055112e eacae20dfeb9442eb8643bb8784b03d1 caee3c14634f42438ec8479eb49ba388 - default default] Unable to execute ['ovs-vsctl', '--timeout=120', '--oneline', '--format=json', '--db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640', '--', '--may-exist', 'add-br', 'br-int', '--', 'set', 'Bridge', 'br-int', 'datapath_type=netdev']. Exception: Unexpected error while running command. Command: ovs-vsctl --timeout=120 --oneline --format=json --db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640 -- --may-exist add-br br-int -- set Bridge br-int datapath_type=netdev Exit code: 1 Stdout: '' Stderr: 'ovs-vsctl: tcp:127.0.0.1:6640: database connection failed (Connection refused)\n': oslo_concurrency.processutils.ProcessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command. ERROR vif_plug_ovs.ovsdb.impl_vsctl Unable to execute ['ovs-vsctl', '--timeout=120', '--oneline', '--format=json', '--db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640', '--', '--may-exist', 'add-port', 'br-int', 'vhu5e8b5246-cd', '--', 'set', 'Interface', 'vhu5e8b5246-cd', 'external_ids:iface-id=5e8b5246-cd05-4735-9692-29d51db6e72d', 'external_ids:iface-status=active', 'external_ids:attached-mac=fa:16:3e:8f:b1:a1', 'external_ids:vm-uuid=30675d24-bd74-409c-ba36-4c59a72283ec', 'type=dpdkvhostuser']. Exception: Unexpected error while running command. Command: ovs-vsctl --timeout=120 --oneline --format=json --db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640 -- --may-exist add-port br-int vhu5e8b5246-cd -- set Interface vhu5e8b5246-cd external_ids:iface-id=5e8b5246-cd05-4735-9692-29d51db6e72d external_ids:iface-status=active external_ids:attached-mac=fa:16:3e:8f:b1:a1 external_ids:vm-uuid=30675d24-bd74-409c-ba36-4c59a72283ec type=dpdkvhostuser Exit code: 1 Stdout: '' Stderr: 'ovs-vsctl: tcp:127.0.0.1:6640: database connection failed (Connection refused)\n': oslo_concurrency.processutils.ProcessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command. 2021-03-09 06:30:36.594 3282 ERROR vif_plug_ovs.ovsdb.impl_vsctl [req-a514ba2a-7ada-4a35-944e-0c861055112e eacae20dfeb9442eb8643bb8784b03d1 caee3c14634f42438ec8479eb49ba388 - default default] Unable to execute ['ovs-vsctl', '--timeout=120', '--oneline', '--format=json', '--db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640', '--', '--columns=mtu_request', 'list', 'Interface']. Exception: Unexpected error while running command. Command: ovs-vsctl --timeout=120 --oneline --format=json --db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640 -- --columns=mtu_request list Interface Exit code: 1 Stdout: '' Stderr: 'ovs-vsctl: tcp:127.0.0.1:6640: database connection failed (Connection refused)\n': oslo_concurrency.processutils.ProcessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command. 2021-03-09 06:30:36.594 3282 ERROR os_vif [req-a514ba2a-7ada-4a35-944e-0c861055112e eacae20dfeb9442eb8643bb8784b03d1 caee3c14634f42438ec8479eb49ba388 - default default] Failed to plug vif VIFVHostUser(active=False,address=fa:16:3e:8f:b1:a1,has_traffic_filtering=False,id=5e8b5246-cd05-4735-9692-29d51db6e72d,mode='client',network=Network(6be19cbf-c6a7-4735-a0ee-42e1c5a664e2),path='/var/run/openvswitch/vhu5e8b5246-cd',plugin='ovs',port_profile=VIFPortProfileOpenVSwitch,preserve_on_delete=True,vif_name='vhu5e8b5246-cd'): oslo_concurrency.processutils.ProcessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command. Command: ovs-vsctl --timeout=120 --oneline --format=json --db=tcp:127.0.0.1:6640 -- --columns=mtu_request list Interface Exit code: 1 Stdout: '' Stderr: 'ovs-vsctl: tcp:127.0.0.1:6640: database connection failed (Connection refused)\n' ============================= ovs information: =========================== _uuid : 4a56f11f-f839-4032-ba85-2eec47260144 bridges : [1a600d85-9849-459a-8453-9a28eee63dc4, f21a1111-3c01-4988-99b7-ca5ab4a73051] cur_cfg : 653 datapath_types : [netdev, system] db_version : "7.16.1" dpdk_initialized : false dpdk_version : none external_ids : {hostname="cmp001", "odl_os_hostconfig_config_odl_l2"="{\"allowed_network_types\": [\"local\", \"flat\", \"vlan\", \"vxlan\", \"gre\"], \"bridge_mappings\": {}, \"datapath_type\": \"netdev\", \"supported_vnic_types\": [{\"vif_details\": {\"uuid\": \"4a56f11f-f839-4032-ba85-2eec47260144\", \"host_addresses\": [\"cmp001\"], \"has_datapath_type_netdev\": true, \"support_vhost_user\": true, \"port_prefix\": \"vhu\", \"vhostuser_socket_dir\": \"/var/run/openvswitch\", \"vhostuser_ovs_plug\": true, \"vhostuser_mode\": \"client\", \"vhostuser_socket\": \"/var/run/openvswitch/vhu$PORT_ID\"}, \"vif_type\": \"vhostuser\", \"vnic_type\": \"normal\"}]}", odl_os_hostconfig_hostid="cmp001", rundir="/var/run/openvswitch", system-id="ec007ae5-4b61-4f8e-af2b-b1b97413d20d"} iface_types : [erspan, geneve, gre, internal, "ip6erspan", "ip6gre", lisp, patch, stt, system, tap, vxlan] manager_options : [11b3ada9-d9b3-42bb-97fc-d254364acecd] next_cfg : 653 other_config : {local_ip="10.1.0.5", provider_mappings="physnet1:br-floating"} ovs_version : "2.11.1" ssl : [] statistics : {} system_type : ubuntu system_version : "18.04" =========================== # ovs-vsctl get bridge br-int datapath_type system =========================== *COMPUTE NODE 2:* nova-compute.log =========================== ERROR nova.compute.manager Failed to build and run instance: libvirt.libvirtError: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: qemu-system-x86_64: -chardev socket,id=charnet0,path=/var/run/openvswitch/vhub701eeae-c0: Failed to connect socket /var/run/openvswitch/vhub701eeae-c0: No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/compute/manager.py", line 2353, in _build_and_run_instance block_device_info=block_device_info) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py", line 3204, in spawn destroy_disks_on_failure=True) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py", line 5724, in _create_domain_and_network destroy_disks_on_failure) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 220, in __exit__ self.force_reraise() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 196, in force_reraise six.reraise(self.type_, self.value, self.tb) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/six.py", line 693, in reraise raise value File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py", line 5693, in _create_domain_and_network post_xml_callback=post_xml_callback) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py", line 5627, in _create_domain guest.launch(pause=pause) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/guest.py", line 144, in launch self._encoded_xml, errors='ignore') File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 220, in __exit__ self.force_reraise() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 196, in force_reraise six.reraise(self.type_, self.value, self.tb) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/six.py", line 693, in reraise raise value File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/guest.py", line 139, in launch return self._domain.createWithFlags(flags) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/tpool.py", line 190, in doit result = proxy_call(self._autowrap, f, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/tpool.py", line 148, in proxy_call rv = execute(f, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/tpool.py", line 129, in execute six.reraise(c, e, tb) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/six.py", line 693, in reraise raise value File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/tpool.py", line 83, in tworker rv = meth(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/libvirt.py", line 1110, in createWithFlags if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainCreateWithFlags() failed', dom=self) libvirt.libvirtError: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: 2021-03-10T07:59:04.064555Z qemu-system-x86_64: -chardev socket,id=charnet0,path=/var/run/openvswitch/vhub701eeae-c0: Failed to connect socket /var/run/openvswitch/vhub701eeae-c0: No such file or directory INFO nova.compute.manager Took 0.68 seconds to deallocate network for instance. INFO nova.scheduler.client.report Deleted allocation for instance 308de941-1192-4dbd-8c4d-d7860139d6d4 =========================== ovs information: =========================== _uuid : b8f5b869-e794-4052-8896-3ee5d323a0b7 bridges : [5b6ab0c7-d8f1-43b0-9ab7-1e77280cd3ff, 70810190-6796-4500-bda4-dae856bcede1] cur_cfg : 1267 datapath_types : [netdev, system] db_version : "7.16.1" dpdk_initialized : false dpdk_version : none external_ids : {hostname="cmp002", "odl_os_hostconfig_config_odl_l2"="{\"allowed_network_types\": [\"local\", \"flat\", \"vlan\", \"vxlan\", \"gre\"], \"bridge_mappings\": {}, \"datapath_type\": \"netdev\", \"supported_vnic_types\": [{\"vif_details\": {\"uuid\": \"b8f5b869-e794-4052-8896-3ee5d323a0b7\", \"host_addresses\": [\"cmp002\"], \"has_datapath_type_netdev\": true, \"support_vhost_user\": true, \"port_prefix\": \"vhu\", \"vhostuser_socket_dir\": \"/var/run/openvswitch\", \"vhostuser_ovs_plug\": true, \"vhostuser_mode\": \"client\", \"vhostuser_socket\": \"/var/run/openvswitch/vhu$PORT_ID\"}, \"vif_type\": \"vhostuser\", \"vnic_type\": \"normal\"}]}", odl_os_hostconfig_hostid="cmp002", rundir="/var/run/openvswitch", system-id="dddc6d6c-0e7c-4813-97c9-7c72eaf9f46b"} iface_types : [erspan, geneve, gre, internal, "ip6erspan", "ip6gre", lisp, patch, stt, system, tap, vxlan] manager_options : [29b4ef4b-e2ba-43f3-aa42-b1bacaf9dd19, 75ae95f6-d251-4152-9e0d-5b65e5f7bb77] next_cfg : 1267 other_config : {local_ip="10.1.0.6", provider_mappings="physnet1:br-floating"} ovs_version : "2.11.1" ssl : [] statistics : {} system_type : ubuntu system_version : "18.04" =========================== # ovs-vsctl get bridge br-int datapath_type netdev =========================== We don't use DPDK on our Openvswitch. Can anyone give us some advice on this issue? Thanks for helping us. [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=sig…> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=sig…> 03/10/21, 04:09:46 PM

1 0

[nova?] kvm/libvirt options
by Mauricio Tavares 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Which kvm options can I specify to an instance when I create it? I am looking at https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/configuration/hypervisor-kvm.h… and it has a handful of CPU ones (based on https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#libvirt) making me think the rest is some kind of openstack default which is a subset of what I can specify using, say, virsh define.

2 1

[election][requirements] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Matthew Thode 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hi all, I would like to self-nominate for the role of PTL of Requirements for the Xena release cycle. I am the current PTL for the Wallaby cycle and I am willing to continue in this role. The following will be my goals for the cycle, in order of importance: 1. The primary goal is to keep a tight rein on global-requirements and upper-constraints updates. (Keep things working well) 2. Un-cap requirements where possible (stuff like prettytable). 3. Fix some automation of generate contstraints (pkg-resources being added and setuptools being dropped) 4. Audit global-requirements and upper-constraints for redundancies. One of the rules we have for new entrants to global-requirements and/or upper-constraints is that they be non-redundant. Keeping that rule in mind, audit the list of requirements for possible redundancies and if possible, reduce the number of requirements we manage. I look forward to continue working with you in this cycle, as your PTL or not. Thank you for your support, -- Matthew Thode

2 1

[election][magnum] Xena PTL candidacy
by Spyros Trigazis 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hello OpenStack community, I would like to continue serving as Magnum PTL. In wallaby we mostly maintained and updated our templates for kubernetes and related addons along with the CI maintenance. In this release, our focus continues to be making the cloud operators easier with: * control-plane on operators tenant * performance improvements for API calls * cluster node replacement * finish transition to helm3 for addons See you in gerrit, Spyros Trigazis

1 0

[election][qa] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Martin Kopec 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hi everyone, I would like to nominate myself for the PTL role of the QA in the Xena cycle. This would be my first PTL service, however, I have been contributing to Tempest for several years and have been a core contributor for over a year now. I'm also a core in refstack projects (python-tempestconf, refstack and refstack-client). A few things I would like to focus on in the Xena cycle: * Get Tempest scenario manager effort [2] finished - we started actively working on this ~2 cycles ago and we have made significant progress. After it's done we will declare the interface stable which will help to decrease the code duplicity among tempest plugins which is directly related to the maintenance difficulty. * Keep decreasing the bug counts * Decrease the number of open patches. Although many projects suffer from not enough personal resources, we can't let the contributors go out of their steam by making their patches to wait in the queue for too long. * Complete priority items from the previous cycles [1] https://www.stackalytics.com/?user_id=mkopec [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager Thanks for your consideration! -- Martin Kopec irc: kopecmartin

1 0

[tripleo][ci] stein and quay.io
by Wesley Hayutin 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Greetings, FYI... At this time the accounts used to push containers in quay.io has been locked out. We are working with quay support to resolve the issue. It's not 100% clear if there is an issue w/ our account or more generally w/ quay [2] At this time we know that the stable/stein branch in tripleo is specifically configured to pull containers from quay and has an open issue [1]. Merging patches on stable/stein is likely blocked unless we move all those jobs to non-voting at this time. Is there any interest in moving the jobs to non-voting? Please respond if this issue is blocking you. Thanks all! [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1915921 [2] https://status.quay.io/

1 0

[TripleO] Xena PTG - registration and reserved time slots
by Marios Andreou 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hello TripleO gentle early reminder that PTG is coming soon-ish... 12 April is not *that* far away ;) As requested by [1] I just booked some slots for us at https://ethercalc.net/oz7q0gds9zfi . I selected the same times we used for the Wallaby PTG - 1300-1700 UTC for Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday. Obviously we are a massively distributed team so there is no good time that will suit everyone. However I think this serves well enough for the majority of our contributors? We may not use Thursday but it was pretty close last time with respect to the number of sessions requested so I booked it just in case. Please speak up if you disagree with the times and days I have booked. Finally *** REMEMBER TO REGISTER *** for the PTG at https://april2021-ptg.eventbrite.com regards, marios [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/020915.ht…

1 1

[election][cloudkitty] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Rafael Weingärtner 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hello guys, I would like to self-nominate for the role of PTL of CloudKitty for the Xena release cycle. I am the current PTL for the Wallaby cycle and I am willing to continue in this role. I will keep working with existing contributors to maintain CloudKitty for their use cases and encourage the addition of new functionalities. Thank you for your support, -- Rafael Weingärtner

1 0

[OSSN-0088] Some of the Glance metadef APIs likely to leak resources
by Abhishek Kekane 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Some of the Glance metadef APIs likely to leak resources -------------------------------------------------------- ### Summary ### Metadef APIs are vulnerable and potentially leaking information to unauthorized users and also there is currently no limit on creation of metadef namespaces, objects, properties, resources and tags. This can be abused by malicious users to fill the Glance database resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. ### Affected Services / Software ### Glance ### Discussion ### There is no restriction on creation of metadef namespaces, objects, properties, resources and tags as well as it could also leak the information to unauthorized users or to the users outside of the project. By taking advantage of this lack of restrictions around metadef APIs, a a single user could fill the Glance database by creating unlimited resources, resulting in a Denial Of Service (DoS) style attack. Glance does allow metadef APIs to be controlled by policy. However, the default policy setting for metadef APIs allows all users to create or read the metadef information. Because metadef resources are not properly isolated to the owner, any use of them with potentially sensitive names (such as internal infrastructure details, customer names, etc) could unintentionally expose that information to a malicious user. ### Recommended Actions ### Since these fundamental issues have been present since the API was introduced, the Glance project is recommending operators disable all metadef APIs by default in their deployments. Here is an example of disabling the metadef APIs in the deployments for current stable OpenStack releases either in policy.json or policy.yaml. ---- begin example policy.json/policy.yaml snippet ---- "metadef_default": "!", "get_metadef_namespace": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_namespaces": "rule:metadef_default", "modify_metadef_namespace": "rule:metadef_default", "add_metadef_namespace": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_object": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_objects": "rule:metadef_default", "modify_metadef_object": "rule:metadef_default", "add_metadef_object": "rule:metadef_default", "list_metadef_resource_types": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_resource_type": "rule:metadef_default", "add_metadef_resource_type_association": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_property": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_properties": "rule:metadef_default", "modify_metadef_property": "rule:metadef_default", "add_metadef_property": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_tag": "rule:metadef_default", "get_metadef_tags": "rule:metadef_default", "modify_metadef_tag": "rule:metadef_default", "add_metadef_tag": "rule:metadef_default", "add_metadef_tags": "rule:metadef_default" ---- end example policy.json/policy.yaml snippet ---- To re-enable metadef policies to be allowed to be admin only, operator(s) can make a change in respective policy.json or policy.yaml as shown below; (assuming all metadef policies are configured to use rule:metadeta_default as shown in above example) ---- begin example policy.json/policy.yaml snippet ---- "metadef_default": "rule:admin", ---- begin example policy.json/policy.yaml snippet ---- Operators with users that depend on metadef APIs may choose to leave these accessible to all users. In that case, education of users about the potential for information leakage in the resource names is advisable so that vulnerable practices can be altered as mitigation. To re-enable metadef policies to all users, operator(s) can make a change in respective policy.json or policy.yaml as shown below; (assuming all metadef policies are configured to use rule:metadeta_default as shown in above example) ---- begin example policy.json/policy.yaml snippet ---- "metadef_default": "", ---- begin example policy.json/policy.yaml snippet ---- ### Contacts / References ### Author: Abhishek Kekane, Red Hat Author: Lance Bragstad, Red Hat This OSSN : https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OSSN/OSSN-0088 Original LaunchPad Bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1545702 Original LaunchPad Bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1916926 Original LaunchPad Bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1916922 Mailing List : [Security] openstack-security(a)lists.openstack.org OpenStack Security Project : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ossg Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane

1 0

Cleanup database(s)
by Eugen Block 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hi *, I have a quick question, last year we migrated our OpenStack to a highly available environment through a reinstall of all nodes. The migration went quite well, we're working happily in the new cloud but the databases still contain deprecated data. For example, the nova-scheduler logs lines like these on a regular basis: /var/log/nova/nova-scheduler.log:2021-02-19 12:02:46.439 23540 WARNING nova.scheduler.host_manager [...] No compute service record found for host compute1 This is one of the old compute nodes that has been reinstalled and is now compute01. I tried to find the right spot to delete some lines in the DB but there are a couple of places so I wanted to check and ask you for some insights. The scheduler messages seem to originate in /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nova/scheduler/host_manager.py ---snip--- for cell_uuid, computes in compute_nodes.items(): for compute in computes: service = services.get(compute.host) if not service: LOG.warning( "No compute service record found for host %(host)s", {'host': compute.host}) continue ---snip--- So I figured it could be this table in the nova DB: ---snip--- MariaDB [nova]> select host,deleted from compute_nodes; +-----------+---------+ | host | deleted | +-----------+---------+ | compute01 | 0 | | compute02 | 0 | | compute03 | 0 | | compute04 | 0 | | compute05 | 0 | | compute1 | 0 | | compute2 | 0 | | compute3 | 0 | | compute4 | 0 | +-----------+---------+ ---snip--- What would be the best approach here to clean up a little? I believe it would be safe to simply purge those lines containing the old compute node, but there might be a smoother way. Or maybe there are more places to purge old data from? I'd appreciate any ideas. Regards, Eugen

2 8

[election][blazar] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Pierre Riteau 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hi, I would like to self-nominate for the role of PTL of Blazar for the Xena release cycle. I have been PTL since the Stein cycle and I am willing to continue in this role. I will keep working with existing contributors to maintain the Blazar software for their use cases and encourage the addition of new functionalities. Thank you for your support, Pierre Riteau (priteau)

1 0

[election][storlets] PTL Candidacy for Xena
by Takashi Kajinami 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hi All, I'd like to announce my candidacy to continue the PTL role for Storlets project in the Xena cycle. Because we currently don't have very active development in Storlets project, I'll propose we mainly focus on the following two items during the next cycle. - Improve stability of our code - Keep compatibility with the latest items - Latest Swift - Latest Ubuntu LTS In addition, I'll initiate some discussion about our future release and management model, considering decreasing resources for reviews and developments. Thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Takashi

1 0

[election][kolla] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Mark Goddard 09 Mar '21

09 Mar '21

Hi, I'd like to nominate myself to serve as the Kolla PTL for the Xena cycle. I have been PTL for the last 4 cycles, and would like the opportunity to continue to lead the team. Overall I think that the project is moving in the right direction. Some things that I think we should focus on in the next cycle are: * remove our dependency on Dockerhub in CI testing to avoid pull limits * improve the documentation * expand the core team Thanks for reading, Mark Goddard (mgoddard)

1 0

How to Handle RabbitMQ peak after restarting neutron-openvswitch-agent
by MaSch 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello at all. After adding an new direct attached VLAN to our computeNodes and restarting neutron-openvswitch-agent, we detected a huge peak in RabbitMQ Messages. Mostly "neutron-vo-Port-1.1_fanout" these messages seem every node produced 5000+ Messages. Due to a bridge_mapping mismatch, the agent repeatedly restarted and produced more and more Messages. At the peak there were about 2Million messages in the queue. As we ran into Network issues caused by Messaging timeouts i would like to know if there is a procedure to handle this messages. Is it save to delete the queue as those messages? It seems they disappeared after a timeout period of about 30 Minutes. are currently using OpenStack Queens release. Thanks a lot in advance. Best regards MaSch

1 0

[election][charms] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Chris MacNaughton 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello all, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the OpenStack Charms project[1] for the Xena cycle. Through my time contributing to the OpenStack Charms project as a core team member, I have experienced working on many of the charms in both a bug-fix and new feature capacity. Additionally, I have made upstream contributions as needed. The OpenStack Charms project has an increasing community both consuming the charms, as well as contributing to them, and I think that it is important to actively nurture this community. In addition to our user community, it is important for OpenStack Charms members to integrate more widely in the wider OpenStack community. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641571/ -- Chris MacNaughton

1 0

openstack:How to create "admin read only " role in openstack
by sandeep singh parihar 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi, can someone please help to "How to create admin read only role " in openstack? Thanks sandeep

1 0

[election][cinder] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Brian Rosmaita 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello everyone, I'd like to announce my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Xena cycle. The primary challenge we face in the Cinder community is that our reviewing bandwidth has declined at the same time third-party driver contributions--new drivers, new features for existing drivers, and driver bugfixes--have been increasing. Similarly, we've been adding better CI coverage (good) while at the same time our gate jobs have become increasingly unstable (not due to the new tests, there are some old failures which seem to be occurring more often). We need to add some new core reviewers in Xena. Luckily, some people have been increasing their review participation recently, so there are community members getting themselves into a position to help the project in this capacity. (And anyone else currently working on cinder project who's interested becoming a cinder core, please contact me (or any of the current cores) to discuss what the expectations are.) We'll also be making it a priority to improve the gate jobs (or else we'll never be able to get anything merged). As far as community activity goes, the multiple virtual mid-cycle meetings have continued to be productive, and the cinder meeting in videoconference that we've been having once a month seems popular and gives us a break from the strict IRC meeting format. There's support to make the Festival of XS Reviews a recurring event, and Sofia has proposed holding a separate (short) bug meeting which we'll start doing soon. Hopefully all these events will help keep current contributors engaged and make it easier for other people to participate more fully. With respect to the details of Cinder development in Xena, I expect those to emerge from our virtual PTG discussions in April. You can help set the agenda here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-cinder-planning Thanks for reading this far, and thank you for your consideration. Brian Rosmaita (rosmaita) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/779425

1 0

[election][horizon] PTL candidacy for Xena
by vishal manchanda 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of Horizon for Xena release. I have been actively contributing to Horizon from stein release [1] and become horizon core reviewer in early train release. During these years, my focus was on filing horizon feature-gap [2], bug-fixing, and stabilizing horizon and its plugins. I am very grateful to all the people that have mentored me and helped me throughout these years. As a PTL I will focus on the following areas: * Migrate horizon & its plugins to the next LTS version of both Django and Nodejs. * Focus on specific set of features-gap instead of targeting all or many at a time. For example, 'System Scope Support' is one of the highest priority we should do in Xena cycle. * Reduce the number of New/Open bugs which is high currently. Something we can do weekly basis in rotation basis or together in meeting etc. * Help new contributors to work on the horizon. I am looking forward to working together with all of you on the Xena release. Thank you, Vishal Manchanda(irc: vishalmanchanda) [1] https://www.stackalytics.io/?metric=commits&release=all&user_id=vishalmanch… [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-feature-gap

1 0

[election][trove] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Lingxian Kong 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi community, I am still very glad to announce my PTL candidacy for Trove, the database-as-a-service in OpenStack. I've been served as Trove PTL since Train release and I spent more than 50% of my working time on this project. I'm so lucky to work for a company that built a public cloud based on OpenStack and has been investing heavily in Open Source since day one. We also deployed Trove in our production, we report bug and fix in the upstream, we don't maintain private changes, we keep growing together with the community. --- Lingxian Kong Senior Cloud Engineer (Catalyst Cloud) Trove PTL (OpenStack) OpenStack Cloud Provider Co-Lead (Kubernetes)

1 0

[TripleO] stable/rocky End Of Life - closed for new code
by Marios Andreou 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

hello TripleO FYI we have now merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/774244 which tags stable/rocky for tripleo repos as End Of Life. *** WE ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTING PATCHES *** for tripleo stable/rocky [1]. In due course the rocky branch will be removed from all tripleO repos, however this will not be possible if there are pending patches open against any of those [1]. So please avoid posting anything to tripleo stable/rocky and if you see a review posted please help by commenting and informing the author that rocky is closed for tripleo. thank you for reading and your help in this matter regards, marios [1] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#rocky

2 1

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC Nominations Last Days
by Kendall Nelson 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello All! A quick reminder that we are in the last hours for declaring PTL and TC candidacies. Nominations are open until Mar 09, 2021 23:45 UTC. If you want to stand for election, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your nomination has been submitted to the openstack/election repository and approved by election officials. Election statistics[2]: Nominations started @ 2021-03-02 23:45:00 UTC Nominations end @ 2021-03-09 23:45:00 UTC Nominations duration : 7 days, 0:00:00 Nominations remaining : 1 day, 0:48:52 Nominations progress : 85.23% --------------------------------------------------- Projects[1] : 49 Projects with candidates : 22 ( 44.90%) Projects with election : 0 ( 0.00%) --------------------------------------------------- Need election : 0 () Need appointment : 27 (Adjutant Barbican Blazar Cinder Cloudkitty Cyborg Designate Horizon Keystone Kolla Magnum Masakari Mistral Monasca OpenStackAnsible OpenStack_Charms Openstack_Chef Quality_Assurance Rally Requirements Senlin Storlets Swift Telemetry Vitrage Zaqar Zun) =================================================== Stats gathered @ 2021-03-08 22:56:08 UTC This means that with approximately 2 days left, 27 projects will be deemed leaderless. In this case the TC will oversee PTL selection as described by [3]. Thank you, -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) & the Election Officials [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy [2] Any open reviews at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+project:openstack/election have not been factored into these stats. [3] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for… __________________________

1 0

[all][qa] Gate failure for <= stable/train and Tempest master gate (Do not recheck)
by Ghanshyam Mann 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello Everyone, get-pip.py url for py2.7 has been changed which causing failure on stable/train or older branches and Tempest master gate. Thanks, Dan, Elod for fixing and backporting those. Please wait for the below fixes to merge and do not recheck. https://review.opendev.org/q/Id62e91b1609db4b1d2fa425010bac1ce77e9fc51 -gmann

1 1

[election][designate] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Michael Johnson 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hello OpenStack community, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of Designate for the Xena cycle. The Wallaby release cycle seems like it went by very quickly and I would like to continue to support the Designate team during the Xena release. Thank you for your support and your consideration for Xena, Michael Johnson (johnsom)

1 0

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 2021-03-01
by Sofia Enriquez 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

This is a bug report from 2021-03-03 to 2021-03-08. Looks like we have a lot of things going on. Some of these bugs were discussed at the Cinder meeting last Wednesday 2021-02-24. Critical: - High: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1916980: "Cinder sends old db object when delete an attachment ''. Assigned to Gorka Eguileor (gorka). - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917450: "Automatic quota refresh counting twice migrating volumes". Assigned to Gorka Eguileor (gorka). - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917287: "Ambiguous error logs for retype of inspur storage volume". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917353: "image_conversion_cpu_limit and image_conversion_address_space_limit settings ignored in /etc/cinder/cinder.conf". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917574: "Cannot show volumes with name for non-admins". Assigned to Rajat Dhasmana. Medium: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1918099: " Nimble revert to snapshot bug". Assigned to Ajitha Robert (ajitharobert01). Low: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917293: "Scheduling is not even among multiple thin provisioning pools which have different sizes". Unassigned. Incomplete: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1916843: " Backup create failed: RBD volume flatten too long causing mq to timed out." Unassigned. Undecided/Unconfirmed: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1918119: "Volume backup timeout for large volumes". Assigned to Kiran Pawar (kiranpawar89). - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1918102: "Cinder-backup progress notification has incorrect percentage." Assigned to Jon Cui (czl389). - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917797: "Cinder request to glance does not support TLS". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917795: "Cinder ignores reader role conventions in default policies". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917750: " Running parallel iSCSI/LVM c-vol backends is causing random failures in CI". Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917605: "Bulk create Hyperswap volume is failing". Assigned to Girish Chilukur. Not a bug:- Feel free to reply/reach me if I missed something. Regards Sofi -- L. Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[Manila ] Bug squash happening next week starting Monday March 15th
by Vida Haririan 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi all, We are planning a new Bug Squash event for next week. The event will be held from 15th through 18th March, 2021, providing plenty of time for all interested to participate. There will be a synchronous bug triage/review call held simultaneously on our Freenode channel #openstack-manila on 18th March, 2021 at 15:00 UTC and on this Jitsi bridge [1]. A list of selected bugs will be provided in advance here [2]. As always, please feel free to update the list with any bugs that you would like us to focus on during this period. Looking forward to you joining us for this event and many thanks in advance for your participation. :) Regards, Vida [1] https://meetpad.opendev.org/ManilaW-ReleaseBugSquash-II [2] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/hrs8m6sqpmaz

1 0

[election][tacker] PTL candidacy for Xena
by Yasufumi Ogawa 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi, I'd like to propose my candidacy for Tacker PTL in Xena cycle. In Wallaby release, we have released several features for the latest ETSI NFV standard while largely updating infras, such as moving to Ubuntu 20.04, supporting redhat distros again and dropping python2 completely for not only Tacker but also related projects such as tosca-parser or heat-translator or so [1]. In addition, we have fixed instability in unit and functional tests for which we have troubles several times. As Tacker PTL, I've led the team by proposing not only new features, but also things for driving the team such as documentation or bug tracking. In Xena cycle, I would like to continue to make Tacker be more useful product for users interested in NFV. I believe Tacker will be a good reference implementation for NFV standard. We have planed to make Tacker more feasible not only for VM environment, but also container to meet requirements from industries. - Continue to implement the latest container technology with ETSI NFV standard. - Introduce multi API versions to meet the requirements for operators enable to deploy mixed environment of multi-vendor products in which some products provide a stable version APIs while other products adopt move advanced ones. - Proceed to design and implement test framework under development in ETSI NFV TST to improve the quality of the product, not only unit tests and functional tests, but also introduce more sophisticated scheme such as robot framework. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/tacker/unreleased.html Regards, Yasufumi Ogawa

1 0

[election][kuryr] PTL Candidacy for Xena
by Maysa De Macedo Souza 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Greetings, I would like to continue serving as Kuryr PTL for the Xena cycle. I have been contributing to the OpenStack community since the Queens release and started serving as Kuryr PTL in the Wallaby cycle. It was a great opportunity to contribute back to the community as PTL and I would like to continue doing that. In wallaby we achieved the following goals: * Improved CI stability and fixed broken gates e.g. Network Policy e2e and OVN gates. * Added new testing scenarios for Services without selectors and Services with sctp. * Extended Kuryr functionalities - we started the dual-stack support and included the support for SCTP and Service without selectors. * Increased the contributor base with new contributors from the Outreachy program. For the next cycle, I propose the following goals for Kuryr: * Improve and extend CI: we already did great improvements, but we must continuously work on it to provide better and quicker feedback during the development process. As part of that, we plan to: update gates to start using Kubeadm and include a new cri-o gate. * Extend Kuryr functionalities: Support dual stack and Kubeadm for DevStack installations, and move Pools management to CRDs. * Continue growing the contributor base. Thanks, Maysa Macedo. IRC: maysams

1 0