- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all][tc][policy] RBAC discussion in 2024.2 PTG
by Ghanshyam Mann 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Hello Everyone, I have booked the Tuesday 15-16 UTC slot Folsom room for the RBAC discussion. Feel free to add the topics/queries to be discussed or your project-related RBAC session info in the below etherpad: - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/rbac-2024.2-ptg -gmann

1 0

Enabling SNAT for Non-Private Addresses
by Jan Wasilewski 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Hi everyone, I'd like to inquire about SNAT settings for non-private addresses. I've created a network with the subnet 100.70.0.0/24 (please note, it starts with 100, not 10). I'm wondering why all hosts attached to such a network cannot establish an internet connection when the network is connected to a router with an external gateway that has internet access. However, I found documentation here: https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/zed/admin/intro-nat.html, which states that SNAT works only for private addresses (so mine are not included). Is there a way to enable SNAT for my subnet as well, but in a different way than manually configuring iptables settings on top of Neutron nodes? If so, could anyone share it? Thanks in advance for your help. /Jan Wasilewski

2 3

[kolla-ansible][Antelope][Heat] Auto Scaling Group - Cancel Update
by Devin Patterson 16 Mar '24

16 Mar '24

Hello, We are working on a workflow to cancel in progress rolling updates for the resource OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup When we run the command `openstack stack cancel <stack-id> it cancels the Heat stack update, but the Auto-Scaling group finishes updating all VMs in the group. We need a way to either rollback or completely cancel the Auto Scaling Group update and not replace any additional VMs. Any help would be appreciated. Devin

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-2
by Thierry Carrez 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Development Focus ----------------- At this point we should have release candidates (RC1 or recent intermediary release) for all the 2024.1 Caracal deliverables. Teams should be working on any release-critical bugs that would require another RC or intermediary release before the final release. Actions ------- Early in the week, the release team will be proposing stable/2024.1 branch creation for all deliverables that have not branched yet, using the latest available 2024.1 Caracal release as the branch point. If your team is ready to go for creating that branch, please let us know by leaving a +1 on these patches. If you would like to wait for another release before branching, you can -1 the patch and update it later in the week with the new release you would like to use. By the end of the week the release team will merge those patches though, unless an exception is granted. Once stable/2024.1 branches are created, if a release-critical bug is detected, you will need to fix the issue in the master branch first, then backport the fix to the stable/2024.1 branch before releasing out of the stable/2024.1 branch. After all of the cycle-with-rc projects have branched we will branch devstack, grenade, and the requirements repos. This will effectively open them up for 2024.2 Dalmatian development, though the focus should still be on finishing up 2024.1 Caracal until the final release. Opening up the new development cycle is also a good opportunity to teams to revise their zuul jobs and used nodesets and clean up all unnecessary ones. For projects with translations, watch for any translation patches coming through and merge them quickly. A new release should be produced so that translations are included in the final 2024.1 Caracal release. Finally, now is a good time to finalize release notes. In particular, consider adding any relevant "prelude" content. Release notes are targeted for the downstream consumers of your project, so it would be great to include any useful information for those that are going to pick up and use or deploy the 2024.1 Caracal version of your project. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Final RC deadline: March 28th, 2024 (R-1 week) Final 2024.1 Caracal release: April 3rd, 2024 Dalmatian PTG: April 8-12, 2024 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

1 0

[skyline] Pending changes to Kolla-ansible for Skyline
by Jäger Uwe 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Dear Skyline-Team, I have created a couple of changes for Kolla-ansible to have Skyline configured to use the latest features. If you find the time, your are invited to have a look at those changes: 909481: Allow overriding of Skyline logos | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909481 910514: Skyline configure Prometheus | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/910514 905861: Allow customizing of Skyline configuration | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/905861 905860: Update Skyline configuration to enable SSO | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/905860 909329: Fix Skyline API Server TLS configuration | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909329 909482: Add more services to nginx.conf | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909482 If you have any questions or comments, please leave them there or contact me directly. Kind regards Uwe

2 1

[dev][ops][neutron] - Securing traffic in colocation env with E2E encryption
by Filip Dobrovolný 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Dear OpenStack Community, I am currently contributing to the Sovereign Cloud Stack (SCS—https://scs.community/) initiative, specifically focusing on enhancing the security of our services through End-to-End (E2E) encryption, particularly in environments where the networking infrastructure isn't directly managed or owned by the OpenStack operator. This scenario is common in colocation settings, Our servers may span multiple racks or buildings that are not entirely under our control. My current focus has been on developing a threat model that addresses potential Man In The Middle (MITM) attacks, such as wiretapping or spoofing, could target physical cables or networking devices. This model is inspired by the security considerations in RFC 8926 I have detailed this model in a GitHub issue: https://github.com/SovereignCloudStack/issues/issues/532#issuecomment-19909… if someone would like to take a deeper look at it and provide feedback. We would greatly value your expertise and feedback on this, either directly on GitHub or via this mailing list. Considering the technical implementation, I'm inclined to employ IPSec, inspired by its usage in TripleO: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/feature… I'd like to hear your insights, recommendations, or experiences regarding the threat model. Are there other potential threats that should be on our radar? If you're aware of any existing solutions or have faced similar challenges, your guidance would be immensely helpful. Thank you in advance for your valuable contributions. I look forward to your feedback. Best Regards, Filip Dobrovolný

1 0

[cinder] Festival of XS reviews (15 March)
by Rajat Dhasmana 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Hello Argonauts, We will be having our monthly festival of reviews this Friday i.e. 15th March (Friday) from 1400-1600 UTC. This will be the last festival for the 2024.1 Caracal cycle. Following are the details: Date: 15th March, 2024 Time: 1400-1600 UTC Meeting link: https://meet.google.com/jqg-eigw-rku etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-festival-of-reviews Thanks Rajat Dhasmana

1 0

[tacker] Patches cannot pass zuul check for RC1
by Yasufumi Ogawa 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Hi team, We still have several patches remained for unexpected failures on zuul check tests. All the failures happen in codes other than we updated and are not always happened. It might be the difficulty we usually meet at the end of releases because of lack of resources on the environment. Unfortunately, it's already over the deadline of RC1 although it can be merged if we have enough time to recheck unitll it's passsed. So, I'd like to fix Tacker's Caracal release and propose to backport the remained patches later. Thank you for your contribution. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/908878 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/910504 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/911639 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/907022 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/907025 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/908752 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/907026 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/907694 Regards, Yasufumi

1 0

OSSN-0093: Unresolved Vulnerability in OpenStack Murano
by Jeremy Stanley 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

OSSN-0093 Unresolved Vulnerability in OpenStack Murano ### Summary ### A severe security vulnerability in all versions of the Murano service will be disclosed at a later date. Murano is an inactive project[*], so no fix is currently under development for this vulnerability. It is strongly recommended that any OpenStack deployments disable or fully remove Murano, if installed, at the earliest opportunity. This security note will be amended at the time of public disclosure to include further details and context, but action should be taken as soon as possible in order to minimize the risk it poses. [*] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inact… ### Affected Services / Software ### - murano: all versions ### Discussion ### This security note is a redacted placeholder, and will be amended with complete details once the associated bug report becomes public. ### Recommended Actions ### Disable the Murano service in, or fully remove it from, all OpenStack deployments at the earliest opportunity. ### Credits ### Not yet disclosed. ### Contacts / References ### Authors: - Jeremy Stanley, OpenStack Vulnerability Coordinator This OSSN: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OSSN/OSSN-0093 Original bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048114 (not yet public) Mailing List : [security-sig] openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org -- Jeremy Stanley, OpenStack Vulnerability Coordinator

1 1

[requirements][releases][heat][mistral][murano] Requirements freeze exception for yaql
by Takashi Kajinami 15 Mar '24

15 Mar '24

Hello, I have another exception request... A critical security issue[1] was discovered recently and we are updating yaql to fix the issue. The required change was already merged into yaql and I've proposed a new yaql release[2]. I'd like to request a requirement freeze exception to pull the fixed version into upper constraints for 2024.1. Please let me know if you have any concern. Thank you, Takashi [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/yaql/+bug/2048114 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/913230 -- Takashi Kajinami irc: tkajinam github: https://github.com/kajinamit launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~kajinamit

3 2

[nova][placement] Zombie placement allocations DB records
by hai wu 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Sometimes there are zombie placement allocations records left for hypervisors, meaning there are no mapping VMs running on those hosts, but the placement allocation records still show up in the database. Does this mean that nova conductor/scheduler would still think those resources have already been allocated, while in reality, there's no existing VMs mapped to those zombie placement allocations records?

3 3

[openstack][octavia] Multi LB Management Networks
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Hello. Is there any way to configure multi lb mnt network for amphorae instances? I am planning to design multiple AZs with separate networks for my system. I am reading this link: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/17… Thank you. Nguyen Huu Khoi

2 2

[Zun] Docker in rootless mode
by Francesco Di Nucci 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Hello, I am working on a 2023.2 instance to install Zun. While we're still in the design phase, I was wondering if it is possible to run Docker as a non-root user together with Kata Containers for enhanced security. Has anyone tried this solution? Regards Francesco Di Nucci

2 4

[cloudkitty][ptg] Virtual Dalmatian vPTG Planning
by Rafael Weingärtner 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Hello guys, Here is [1] our etherpad for the Dalmatian/2024.2 virtual PTG. Please, add your topics there if there is anything you would like to discuss/propose. I have already created a basic structure in the etherpad. I already scheduled the room and time slots. If you guys have any other suggestions, please let me know. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/apr2024-ptg-cloudkitty -- Rafael Weingärtner

1 0

What deployment tools do you use? What do you like in them?
by Ruslanas Gžibovskis 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Hi team, Could you, please, share your opinion and your experience with deployment methods. Also what are the tools you use? I have some deployments running TripleO tool. What I like is that we can deploy on empty servers and customizable OpenStack Installation. Sadly TripleO stopped working on new releases last year. Question: Which deployment method you would recommend which would support deploying on empty servers? My plan is to use CentOS Stream as base OS. My setup: 3x controller and 10+ computes. All with generic things except cinder, I do not have volumes and telemetry. But this year I need to add SR-IOV and some computes with RT kernels. Suggestions? My research: OSP-ansible - looks like it could deploy without containerization (I find it as a benefit). (could someone share sample config you use?) Kolla-ansible - looks like old time here and most used? (could someone share sample config you use?) But all above are deploying on existing OS. Tho I have found the Kayobe, quite new to me, have you tried? How multi-controller and multicompute deployment config looks like? Thank you for your opinion or sharing your experience with the tools you use. -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030

3 4

[Cinder] Storage not detected when instance boots from ISO
by Francesco Di Nucci 14 Mar '24

14 Mar '24

Hello, premised that probably I am misunderstanding default behavior, I'm experiencing a weird issue with storage/volumes: * Cinder storage has only a NFS backend, with "cinder.volume.drivers.nfs.NfsDriver" driver * When I launch an instance through Horizon from a QCOW2 cloud image and with an associated volume, everything is ok (instances start, changes to the instance are persistent and remain through reboots etc) * But if I launch an instance from an ISO (CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu - DVD or minimal, seems to be OS-independent) and with an associated volume, I can use the installer through the noVNC console but it does not detect disks. Even if the volume is attached, the OS booted from ISO does not report/find it, and the installation can't proceed Is this normal/default behavior or is something wrong with my install? Best regards Francesco Di Nucci

1 0

Security Group Rules on Octavia Amphorae
by Kees Meijs | Nefos 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Hello list, When creating a new load balancer using Octavia, I noticed the VIP network port gets assigned a dynamic created Security Group. The Security Group does not contain a rule allowing ICMP, therefore the VIP not being "pingable". Other than harder diagnostics, it could pose PMTU issues and such. Is it maybe possible to either just enable ICMP, or maybe template the dynamic Security Groups? Thanks in advance! Cheers, Kees

2 2

[swift] Increase part power on account/container ring
by Thiago De Moraes Teixeira 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Morning, Here we have a cluster with Accounts/Containers ring with part power 8 and our Objects ring with part power 20 (builted later). Now we want to migrate the 'old' Accounts/Containers ring to a new one, with higher part power, like 20. Is there a better way to do this? I'm doing some crazy tests with SAIO and multiples storage nodes, based in build a new ring with part power 20 and just swap the old files (account/container.ring.gz) with the new ones and let the replicators do their jobs, moving *.db files to their new home partition. Until today these tests worked fine, but I don't know how to do it on a large scale, with some terabytes of data. Just wondering about some ways to do that :) And before/after this change, is there any command in swift that i can audit this entire process, ensuring that cluster data remains the same? Thanks! -- _‘Esta mensagem é direcionada apenas para os endereços constantes no cabeçalho inicial. Se você não está listado nos endereços constantes no cabeçalho, pedimos-lhe que desconsidere completamente o conteúdo dessa mensagem e cuja cópia, encaminhamento e/ou execução das ações citadas estão imediatamente anuladas e proibidas’._ * **‘Apesar do Magazine Luiza tomar todas as precauções razoáveis para assegurar que nenhum vírus esteja presente nesse e-mail, a empresa não poderá aceitar a responsabilidade por quaisquer perdas ou danos causados por esse e-mail ou por seus anexos’.*

3 8

[swift] Multi-policy container
by m.victorello＠luizalabs.com 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Hello, Is there any plan to support multi-policy containers? Why the container's database have a 'storage_policy_index' column for objects? As far as I know the policy index comes from the container (broker.get_info). I don't know that much about changing the policy of a container, i think those are related.

2 1

[magnum] ClusterAPI driver out of tree
by Jake Yip 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Hi all, After the previous discussions[1] on the ML, Magnum and StackHPC have decided to create and maintain separate repos[2] for StackHPC's contributed cluster api driver. The repos are currently 1. magnum-capi-helm - driver implementation 2. magnum-capi-helm-charts - helm charts used by driver This will allow the driver to be out of tree, yet still be in governance. StackHPC and Magnum Core team will work together to test the driver in CI. I hope this will please everyone and be a way forward. Regards, Jake [1] https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/910240 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/910239 -- Jake Yip Technical Lead, ARDC Nectar Research Cloud

1 0

opensearch dashboards example
by Satish Patel 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Folks, Recently I have deployed opensearch logging for ELK replacement and trying to create some visualization dashboard but its new tool and learning curve. Will appreciate If anyone has any example dashboard or visualizer for logging etc. ~S

1 0

Re: [keystone] application creds issue with permission
by Satish Patel 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Hi Artem, You are 100% correct here, I have noticed as soon as I give the reader the role it works. Thank you! On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:02 PM Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Can you please check which roles are bound to the appcred? The reason I am > asking is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/910337 (wrong > treatment of implied roles when you create appcred explicitly specifying > role that implies another role (basically if you create appcred with member > role - reader role is not given) > > ---- > typed from mobile, auto-correct typos assumed > ---- > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024, 20:57 Satish Patel <satish.txt(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> I am running the 2023.1 release of openstack using kolla-ansible. I have >> integrated with LDAP and everything works fine. But today when I created >> application creds and used that to access openstack api I got all kinds of >> strange auth errors. >> >> #!/usr/bin/env bash >> export OS_AUTH_TYPE=v3applicationcredential >> export OS_AUTH_URL=https://openstack-eng.example.com:5000 >> export OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3 >> export OS_REGION_NAME="eng" >> export OS_INTERFACE=public >> export OS_APPLICATION_CREDENTIAL_ID=ee17300916b1401f912f6140ce9cd642 >> export OS_APPLICATION_CREDENTIAL_SECRET=XXXXXXXXX >> >> # openstack server list >> ForbiddenException: 403: Client Error for url: >> https://openstack-eng.example.com:8774/v2.1/servers/detail?deleted=False, >> Policy doesn't allow os_compute_api:servers:detail to be performed. >> >> >> # openstack image list >> ForbiddenException: 403: Client Error for url: >> https://openstack-eng.example.com:9292/v2/images, You are not authorized >> to complete get_images action.<br /><br /> >> >> What is wrong here because I have one more setup of openstack which is >> not using LDAP but in that cloud application creds working fine. >> >> # cat /etc/keystone/keystone.conf >> >> [DEFAULT] >> debug = False >> transport_url = hiding.... >> log_file = /var/log/kolla/keystone/keystone.log >> use_stderr = True >> >> [oslo_middleware] >> enable_proxy_headers_parsing = True >> >> [database] >> connection = mysql+pymysql:// >> keystone:hiding...@openstack-eng.example.com:3306/keystone >> connection_recycle_time = 10 >> max_pool_size = 1 >> max_retries = -1 >> >> [identity] >> domain_specific_drivers_enabled = true >> domain_config_dir = /etc/keystone/domains >> >> [token] >> revoke_by_id = False >> provider = fernet >> expiration = 86400 >> allow_expired_window = 172800 >> >> [fernet_tokens] >> max_active_keys = 3 >> >> [cache] >> backend = oslo_cache.memcache_pool >> enabled = True >> memcache_servers = 10.0.25.201:11211,10.0.25.202:11211,10.0.25.203:11211 >> >> [oslo_messaging_notifications] >> transport_url = rabbit://openstack:hiding.... >> driver = noop >> >> [oslo_messaging_rabbit] >> heartbeat_in_pthread = True >> amqp_durable_queues = true >> rabbit_quorum_queue = true >> kombu_reconnect_delay = 0.5 >> rabbit_transient_queues_ttl = 60 >> >> >> # cat /etc/keystone/domains/keystone.eng.conf >> >> # Ansible managed >> >> [identity] >> driver = ldap >> >> [ldap] >> debug_level = 4095 >> group_allow_create = False >> group_allow_delete = False >> group_allow_update = False >> group_id_attribute = cn >> hiding.... >> hiding.... >> >>

1 0

[keystone] application creds issue with permission
by Satish Patel 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

Folks, I am running the 2023.1 release of openstack using kolla-ansible. I have integrated with LDAP and everything works fine. But today when I created application creds and used that to access openstack api I got all kinds of strange auth errors. #!/usr/bin/env bash export OS_AUTH_TYPE=v3applicationcredential export OS_AUTH_URL=https://openstack-eng.example.com:5000 export OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3 export OS_REGION_NAME="eng" export OS_INTERFACE=public export OS_APPLICATION_CREDENTIAL_ID=ee17300916b1401f912f6140ce9cd642 export OS_APPLICATION_CREDENTIAL_SECRET=XXXXXXXXX # openstack server list ForbiddenException: 403: Client Error for url: https://openstack-eng.example.com:8774/v2.1/servers/detail?deleted=False, Policy doesn't allow os_compute_api:servers:detail to be performed. # openstack image list ForbiddenException: 403: Client Error for url: https://openstack-eng.example.com:9292/v2/images, You are not authorized to complete get_images action.<br /><br /> What is wrong here because I have one more setup of openstack which is not using LDAP but in that cloud application creds working fine. # cat /etc/keystone/keystone.conf [DEFAULT] debug = False transport_url = hiding.... log_file = /var/log/kolla/keystone/keystone.log use_stderr = True [oslo_middleware] enable_proxy_headers_parsing = True [database] connection = mysql+pymysql:// keystone:hiding...@openstack-eng.example.com:3306/keystone connection_recycle_time = 10 max_pool_size = 1 max_retries = -1 [identity] domain_specific_drivers_enabled = true domain_config_dir = /etc/keystone/domains [token] revoke_by_id = False provider = fernet expiration = 86400 allow_expired_window = 172800 [fernet_tokens] max_active_keys = 3 [cache] backend = oslo_cache.memcache_pool enabled = True memcache_servers = 10.0.25.201:11211,10.0.25.202:11211,10.0.25.203:11211 [oslo_messaging_notifications] transport_url = rabbit://openstack:hiding.... driver = noop [oslo_messaging_rabbit] heartbeat_in_pthread = True amqp_durable_queues = true rabbit_quorum_queue = true kombu_reconnect_delay = 0.5 rabbit_transient_queues_ttl = 60 # cat /etc/keystone/domains/keystone.eng.conf # Ansible managed [identity] driver = ldap [ldap] debug_level = 4095 group_allow_create = False group_allow_delete = False group_allow_update = False group_id_attribute = cn hiding.... hiding....

1 0

[ansible][aio][glance] Cannot create image, TypeError: Response is undefined
by Tang Chai Keong 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

I deployed openstack-ansible AIO and is trying to create a new image but is encountering "TypeError: Response is undefined" and "Error: Unable to create the image". The image creation task is just stuck in the "queued" mode forever after that. I also do not see any of the service logs in the lxc containers under /var/logs/ folder. Appreciate any advice on how I can troubleshoot this. Thank you. Regards, Ben

2 2

[tc] Next Meeting Tomorrow, March 12, 1800 UTC
by Jay Faulkner 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

Hi all, the next weekly meeting of the OpenStack Technical Committee is tomorrow, March 12, at 1800 UTC. It will be held on #openstack-tc in OFTC. *US-based contributors please note that the meeting time does not change with DST.* The proposed agenda is: - Roll call - Follow up on tracked action items - Gate health check - Implementation of Unmaintained branch statuses - Testing runtime for 2024.2 release (gmann) - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/908862 - TC vPTG 2024.2 / TC Tracker 2024.1 - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2024.1-tracker - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/apr2024-ptg-os-tc - Open Discussion and Reviews Thanks, Jay Faulkner OpenStack TC Chair

1 0