- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

custom playbook for nova
by engineer2024 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

can anyone guide me what are the tasks required for configuring nova service in OSA, so that I want to execute only those tasks and db steps , skipping the package installation steps. So I need to run nova playbook just to configure the nova like nova.conf, populating it with relevant options, do nova db migrate and then just restart the services. Is there a way to do it ? Thanks elinux

2 2

yoga to antelope upgrade path
by Satish Patel 05 Jan '25

05 Jan '25

Folks, I am running yoga in production with ovn driver and planning to upgrade to the 2023.1 release. Are there any issues to directly go to 2023.1 before intermediate release? Or anything critical I should be aware of?

3 3

[neutron][ovn] ovn database backup and restore
by Satish Patel 04 Jan '25

04 Jan '25

Folks, I have OVN running on 3 node controllers with a RAFT clustering. What is the best way to take backup of all the databases of nb_db and sb_db and how to restore them during a full disaster situation? Is the following the correct way to take backup? ovsdb-client backup unix:///run/ovn/ovnnb_db.sock OVN_Northbound > nb-snap-$(date +%s).txt ovsdb-client backup unix:///run/ovn/ovnsb_db.sock OVN_Southbound > sb-snap-$(date +%s).txt During restore on what node we should restore and does restore work on fresh cluster or existing cluster? How do other folks handle disaster scenarios where all 3 nodes are down or required migration?

3 6

Failing at TASK [glance : Copy over multiple ceph configs for Glance]
by Karera Tony 04 Jan '25

04 Jan '25

Hello Team, I am deploying Openstack release 2024.02 with External Ceph. However I am encountering the error below. But it is failing here TASK [glance : Copy over multiple ceph configs for Glance] Please assist Regards Tony Karera

2 1

[release] Release countdown for week R-12
by Thierry Carrez 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

Development Focus ----------------- The epoxy-2 milestone is next week, on January 9th, 2025! Epoxy-related specs should now be finalized so that teams can move to implementation ASAP. Some teams observe specific deadlines on the second milestone (mostly spec freezes): please refer to https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html for details. General Information ------------------- Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next week, the release team will propose releases for any library that has not been otherwise released since milestone 1. PTL's and release liaisons, please watch for these and give a +1 to acknowledge them. If there is some reason to hold off on a release, let us know that as well. A +1 would be appreciated, but if we do not hear anything at all by the end of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed. Remember that non-library deliverables that follow the cycle-with-intermediary release model should have an intermediary release before milestone-2. Those who haven't will be proposed to switch to the cycle-with-rc model, which is more suited to deliverables that are released only once per cycle. Next week is also the deadline to freeze the contents of the final release. All new 2025.1 Epoxy deliverables need to have a deliverable file in https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables and need to have done a release by milestone-2. Changes proposing those deliverables for inclusion in 2025.1 Epoxy have been posted, please update them with an actual release request before the milestone-2 deadline if you plan on including that deliverable in 2025.1 Epoxy, or -1 if you need one more cycle to be ready. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Epoxy-2 Milestone: January 9th, 2025 2025.1 Epoxy final release: April 2nd, 2025 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

1 0

hexchat irc channel
by Alex Song (宋文平) 30 Dec '24

30 Dec '24

Hello, I update hexchat and which network is available now? Thanks [cid:image001.png@01DB5782.29D8F150] [cid:image002.png@01DB5782.29D8F150] [cid:image003.png@01DB5782.29D8F150]

3 5

How to find the official documentation for installing OpenStack services and how to locate the historical documentation
by ゞPositive î 30 Dec '24

30 Dec '24

 https://docs.openstack.org/install-guide/openstack-services.html# I am installing the OpenStack zed version. How can I find the zed version document in this official document, as there are only the last four versions available ゞPositive ? 451526204(a)qq.com  

2 1

OpenStack zed version seeking help
by 451526204＠qq.com 30 Dec '24

30 Dec '24

Identity service Image service Placement service Compute service Networking service Dashboard Block Storage service In the official documentation, when installing OpenStack services, there are only the last four versions in the interface of the above services. So where can I find the zed version when installing it?

2 1

How to find the official documentation for installing OpenStack services and how to locate the historical documentation
by ゞPositive î 28 Dec '24

28 Dec '24

 https://docs.openstack.org/install-guide/openstack-services.html# I am installing the OpenStack zed version. How can I find the zed version document in this official document, as there are only the last four versions available ゞPositive ? 451526204(a)qq.com  

1 0

[ceilometer]Intel RDT CMT support on OpenStack
by Junya Noguchi (Fujitsu) 26 Dec '24

26 Dec '24

To whom it may concern I have a question about the support status of Intel RDT CMT in OpenStack. We are planning to commit Resource Monitoring functionality to Openstack for ARM, and are exploring the implementation of Intel RDT on Openstack. We found a document published by Intel on the Intel RDT CMT on OpenStack.[1] However, when I checked the source code for nova and ceilometer, it was modified to ignore the settings in the documentation[1].[2] In addition, ceilometer was written to perform resource monitoring by itself. Is resource monitoring with ceilometer supported? Or is it just old code that is not used? [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/training/how-to-… [2] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L… Best regards, Junya Noguchi.

2 2

[nova] force pinning instances to AZ
by Arnaud Morin 24 Dec '24

24 Dec '24

Hey all, I have a region with multiple AZ. If the server was not created in a specific zone then it is free to be moved to other zones. Is there any way in nova config to prevent this? Regards, Arnaud.

7 10

[tacker] Cancelling the next two weekly meetings
by Yasufumi Ogawa 24 Dec '24

24 Dec '24

Hi all, Due to the holidays, I'd skip the next two meetings. So, the next our meeting is Jan 14th. Thanks, Yasufumi

1 1

ERROR openstack [-] Resource OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort maps to type OS::Neutron::Port and the Neutron service is not available when using ephemeral Heat.| Openstack tripleo wallaby version
by Swogat Pradhan 23 Dec '24

23 Dec '24

Hi, I am currently trying to deploy openstack wallaby using tripleo arch. I created the network jinja templates, ran the following commands also: #openstack overcloud network provision --stack overcloud --output networks-deployed-environment.yaml custom_network_data.yaml # openstack overcloud network vip provision --stack overcloud --output vip-deployed-environment.yaml custom_vip_data.yaml # openstack overcloud node provision --stack overcloud --overcloud-ssh-key /home/stack/sshkey/id_rsa overcloud-baremetal-deploy.yaml and used the environment files in the openstack overcloud deploy command: (undercloud) [stack@hkg2director ~]$ cat deploy.sh #!/bin/bash THT=/usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/ CNF=/home/stack/ openstack overcloud deploy --templates $THT \ -r $CNF/templates/roles_data.yaml \ -n $CNF/workplace/custom_network_data.yaml \ -e ~/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml \ -e $CNF/templates/node-info.yaml \ -e $CNF/templates/scheduler-hints.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/networks-deployed-environment.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/vip-deployed-environment.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/overcloud-baremetal-deployed.yaml \ -e $CNF/workplace/custom-net-bond-with-vlans.yaml Now when i run the ./deploy.sh script i encounter an error stating: ERROR openstack [-] Resource OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort maps to type OS::Neutron::Port and the Neutron service is not available when using ephemeral Heat. The generated environments from 'openstack overcloud baremetal provision' and 'openstack overcloud network provision' must be included with the deployment command.: tripleoclient.exceptions.InvalidConfiguration: Resource OS::TripleO::Network::Ports::ControlPlaneVipPort maps to type OS::Neutron::Port and the Neutron service is not available when using ephemeral Heat. The generated environments from 'openstack overcloud baremetal provision' and 'openstack overcloud network provision' must be included with the deployment command. 2022-04-19 13:47:16.582 735924 INFO osc_lib.shell [-] END return value: 1 Can someone tell me where the mistake is? With regards, Swogat Pradhan

4 4

[all] Installation guide for openSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise
by Takashi Kajinami 23 Dec '24

23 Dec '24

Hello, As you may know, we have been maintaining installation guide for three linux distributions below. - oepnSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise - Red Hat Enterprise Linux and CentOS - Ubuntu However, as far as I know, the packages for openSUSE and SLES haven't been built/updated for some time. Also openSUSE was removed from tested runtimes in wallaby and hasn't been tested. So I doulbt that users can use these operating systems to install OpenStack nowadays. Can/Should we remove the guide for openSUSE/SLES Now ? I'm not very sure if we can maintain the guide for these with no details available nowadays. Thank you, Takashi -- Takashi Kajinami irc: tkajinam github: https://github.com/kajinamit launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~kajinamit

2 1

[neutron] Bug deputy Dec 16 - Dec 22
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 23 Dec '24

23 Dec '24

Hello Neutrinos: This is the bug list from last week: HIGH * api slow due to missing LRP index ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2092133) Assigned and patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovsdbapp/+/938004 MEDIUM * [RFE] OVN: allow to configure activation-strategy (change it to a different strategy from rarp; or disable completely) ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2092250) Assigned and patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/938106 LOW * [OVN] Migrate the OVN L3 scheduler to use HA_Chassis_Group ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2092271) Assigned. * Deprecate and remove vlan_transparent config option ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2092174) *NOT ASSIGNED*. Regards.

1 0

[freezer][freezer-dr] Proposal to retire Freezer DR project
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 23 Dec '24

23 Dec '24

Hi folks, As an ongoing effort to return Freezer project back to the list of Active projects and recovering gate health for repositories owned by Freezer, I've come across freezer-dr[1] Freezer DR is a separate from freezer/freezer-api instance-ha project which is highly pluggable by design with the main goal to evacuate instances from the compute node once service detects that the serving compute node is down. And that is what is currently achieved by the Masakari project. While pluggable design for the service, can be treated as a good benefit in favor of it. Another relatively valuable benefit of freezer-dr, is that it uses nova service state to detect if the compute is down, rather then require 3rd party cluster tooling to independently evaluate hypervisor health. Regardless, I don't see enough value to keep maintenance of that project and instead it's better to keep focus on Masakari maintenance/development instead. With that being said, I suggest the retirement of the freezer-dr project. If someone feels in favor of keeping maintenance of a separate project for instance evacuation - please feel free to reply in thread until December 10, 2024. After that date I will initiate the project retirement process. [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/freezer-dr

2 2

[magnum][cluster api] Heads-up - Octavia OVN driver and latest CAPO
by Stig Telfer 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Hi Magnum folks - Heads up - we wanted to make people aware of a recent upstream CAPO change that could break your Magnum setup if using Cluster API and the Octavia OVN driver. What we've seen is that a recent contribution to CAPO tightens the security group rules for NodePorts to the local tenant network. This works fine for Octavia's Amphora driver, in which HAproxy becomes the source for all back-end API requests. The Octavia OVN driver doesn't have that behaviour, which results in inbound requests getting filtered. The CAPO release is v0.11.0 (https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack/releases/…) The issue is described here: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack/issues/23… The Magnum drivers will pin CAPO driver versions so it's more of a developer / power-user concern than for conventional operators. Cheers, Stig

1 0

[masakari] is this project still active and can be used in production environment
by luckydog xf 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Hi, list, I saw this project hasn't been active for months. So I'm wondering if it is still actively developed and can it be used in production? Are there any use cases ? Thanks.

4 8

Openstack ansible Upgrades
by engineer2024 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Is it possible to upgrade openstack ansible from one major release to another, along with the os distribution upgrade all in one flow ? I mean, as of now we are doing the upgrade as two step process. first we are upgrading the os of the hosts and then the os of the lxc containers and then re running the existing openstack version playbooks. Next , we are upgrading to major release of OSA. This two step process is doubling our effort and time to upgrade to a major version. Is it possible to download and run the major release playbooks soon after the os upgrades ? instead of rerunning the existing playbook again and then download and running next version playbooks ?

2 1

[openstack][magnum] user who created cluster was deleted from keystone
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

Hello. I have a case: What will we do if the user who created the cluster was deleted from the keystone? In this case, we cannot add or remove node groups or use autoscale and autoheal. I tried to create a new application credential and patch my cluster. Then I can add or remove node groups but new node groups cannot join the cluster(nodes not ready) Thank you. Regards Nguyen Huu Khoi

2 2

[cinder] Next 2 Meetings cancelled
by Jon Bernard 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

Hello all, the next two weekly meetings (Dec. 25 and Jan 1) are cancelled for the holidays. I hope everyone has a nice break! Catch you at the Jan 8. meeting. Take care, -- Jon

1 0

[manila] Cancelling Dec 26th and Jan 2nd weekly meeting
by Carlos Silva 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

Hello zorillas, As announced in the previous weekly meetings, we will not have the upstream weekly meeting in the next two weeks, as most of the Zorillas will be taking a break over the year-end holidays. We will be back to our regular schedule on Jan 9th. Thank you very much for your collaboration throughout the year. This has been an incredible year and we got a lot done together. You definitely make this community more special. Wishing you a very well-deserved break! Cheers, carloss

1 0

[manila] Removal of the Standalone CephFS NFS Protocol Helper in Epoxy
by Ashley Rodriguez 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

Hi zorillas! As per subject line, we will be deprecating the standalone CephFS NFS protocol helper in this cycle. This is following our deprecation warning we put out in 2024.1 / Caracal [1] [2]. We've supported using a clustered Ceph NFS service since the Zed release. We've also added upgrade helpers to migrate from a standalone NFS-Ganesha service to the ceph-orch-deployed clustered NFS service; this code was backported to stable/2023.1 (Antelope). Although the upgrade path is disruptive, there is a UX improvement in Manila to ease this migration through surfacing “preferred” export paths. Moving forward, deployments must have “cephfs_nfs_cluster_id” in your configuration, otherwise the driver will fail to start. Manila will not make any export changes to NFS-Ganesha, so upgrading manila without an NFS cluster will mean that only the control plane is not going to work; but, data plane will remain unaffected. To assist migration, admins can also configure "cephfs_ganesha_export_ips" (or alternatively, "cephfs_ganesha_server_ip") alongside "cephfs_nfs_cluster_id". Setting these options will allow the CephFS driver to report additional export paths. These additional export paths will have the "preferred" metadata key set to False. Best, Manila team [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/912648 [2] https://docs.openstack.org/manila/2024.2/configuration/shared-file-systems/…

1 0

[Glance] Cancelling weekly meeting for Next 2 weeks
by Mridula Joshi 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

Hello, Due to year end holidays, most of the team members are not around for the next two weeks, so cancelling weekly meetings . Next Glance meeting will be on January 9th !! Thanks, Mridula Joshi

1 0

[kolla] No weekly meetings until 8th January 2025
by Michał Nasiadka 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

Hello Koalas, Weekly meetings until 8th January (i.e. 25th Dec and 1st Jan) are cancelled. See you on 8th of January! Cheers, Michal

1 0