- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[Kolla] Transition Yoga and Zed to EOL
by Jakub Darmach 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello, As agreed during the latest IRC meeting, Kolla Yoga and Zed deliverables (Kolla, Kolla-Ansible, Kayobe) are going EOL. [1] Antelope remains as unmaintained, while Bobcat, Caracal and Dalmatian are our current stable releases. Yoga and Zed branches were unmaintained for a while, Kolla community does not have resources to support those branches actively. All changes to those branches have been abandoned. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/937101 Best regards, *Jakub Darmach*

1 0

Open Stack APIs
by darsh.mehta＠crestdata.ai 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello, We want to create an integration with OpenStack for which we require the REST APIs to connect to OpenStack. However, OpenStack provides 2 offerings i.e. Cloud and On-Prem. We are referring to the OpenStack API documentation available over here https://docs.openstack.org/api-quick-start/api-quick-start.html#. But it does not specify anywhere whether the APIs are for cloud or on-prem. Are the APIs same for both or do we have separate documentation for each of these? Thanks in advance!

4 3

[Neutron] WSGI migration issues and eventlet requirements bump
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

Hello Neutrinos: There is a patch [1] that is trying to bump the eventlet upper version. However, the tempest job is failing because of Neutron. There is a series of patches [2][3][4][5] that are trying to address the problems we are having with the migration to WSGI. I would ask you to review them soon in order to unblock the requirements patch. On top of this series there is a testing patch with several tempest jobs running. We still have some problems but they are limited. Thanks! [1]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/933257 [2]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936428 [3]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936813 [4]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936838 [5]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/934409

1 0

OpenStack is Now on Bluesky
by Helena Spease 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hello Everyone, We’re thrilled to announce that OpenStack and the OpenInfra Foundation now have a presence on Bluesky! This is part of our continued effort to connect with our community and share updates in new and engaging ways. Here’s where you can now find us: - OpenStack on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/openstack.org - OpenInfra Foundation on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/openinfra.org Don’t forget, that OpenStack is already active on these platforms: - Mastodon: https://social.openinfra.dev/@OpenStack - Twitter: https://x.com/OpenStack - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/openstack/ And, the OpenInfra Foundation is already active on these platforms: - Mastodon: https://social.openinfra.dev/@OpenInfra - Twitter: https://x.com/openinfradev - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openinfradev - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/openinfra-foundation Join the conversation and engage with the OpenInfra community wherever you are most active! Cheers, Helena helena(a)openinfra.dev Community Programs Coordinator The OpenInfra Foundation <https://openinfra.dev/>

1 0

OSA adding compute without deploy host
by Derek O keeffe 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi all, I have a controller and 2 compute setup that was deployed some time ago with OSA. It's been running fine since it was deployed but we now have the need for more compute and I was looking at the deploy host to add a compute host to the cluster. Unfortunately it seems the deploy host was repurposed and I have lost all the config. So two questions, 1) Is it possible to manually add a compute to the cluster (I fairly confident this is a yes) and 2) if so is there any documentation or how to that someone could point me to/share? any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards,Derek

2 2

[kolla-ansible][neutron][openvswitch]
by Adam Tomas 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi everyone. I have strange problem with neutron ml2 plugin. I have a little strange setup: controllers in networkA/subnetA computesA in networkA/subnetA computesB in networkB/subnetB (separate L2, controllers can be connected via routing) Because computesB are on different LAN I had to put on two computes in that lan neutron-dhcp-agents and add them to networks served for instances in locationB. In addition aggregates are created so, that if an instance has network from locationB then it has to start on computes in locationB. computes and controllers have one flat network (vlan 21) ans three vlan networks (221, 51 and 251),, vlans 21 and 221 are in locationA, 51 and 251 in locationB, the ml2_plugin is configured like below: [ml2_type_vlan] network_vlan_ranges = physnet1:221:221,physnet2:51:51,physnet3:251:251 bond0 is the neutron_external_interface and has vlan 21 as native and 221,51 and 251 as tagged vlans. Openstack networks are mapped to corresponding physnets. dhcp_agents in location A are working without any problems, vm's are started without any problem in vlans 21 and 221 with addresses from all subnets from networks in these vlans. In location B when I add dhcp_agent the port is doen (namespaces qdhcpxxxxxxxxx are created on computesB and are replying to their own address, but not the gateway or any other address), port status of dhcp_agent is DOWN, and in logs I have: Device Port(admin_state_up=True,allowed_address_pairs=[],binding_levels=[],bindings=[PortBinding],created_at=2024-12-01T17:52:25Z,data_plane_status=None,description='',device_id='dhcpfd2f8da2-397b-5456-a75c-f9c5bbccb8b1-81b9ac42-6267-48e2-8352-0ae5c09d85fa',device_owner='network:dhcp',device_profile=<?>,dhcp_options=[],distributed_bindings=[],dns=None,fixed_ips=[IPAllocation,IPAllocation],hints=None,id=08c60b9d-ea8f-4a2d-a3b7-5f787d15f45d,mac_address=fa:16:3e:37:27:0c,name='',network_id=81b9ac42-6267-48e2-8352-0ae5c09d85fa,numa_affinity_policy=<?>,project_id='c0e2f3d69c064ae5b5596fd150d550d7',qos_network_policy_id=None,qos_policy_id=None,revision_number=2,security=PortSecurity(08c60b9d-ea8f-4a2d-a3b7-5f787d15f45d),security_group_ids=set([]),status='DOWN',updated_at=2024-12-01T17:52:25Z) is not bound. Device 08c60b9d\-ea8f\-4a2d\-a3b7\-5f787d15f45d not defined on plugin or binding failed Port 08c60b9d-ea8f-4a2d-a3b7-5f787d15f45d cannot update to ACTIVE because it failed. _port_provisioned /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/neutron/plugins/ml2/plugin.py:357 Why the same configuration works in LocationA? In location B the same situation is with all ports - even if I create a port "by hand". The error message (in debug mode!) says not much - Device 08c60b9d\-ea8f\-4a2d\-a3b7\-5f787d15f45d not defined on plugin or binding failed, how can I find what is wrong? I would appreciate any help. Best regards, Adam Tomas

1 1

[kolla-ansible][nova] Refresh cell cache in nova scheduler
by Satish Patel 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Folks, What is wrong here, I do have the following hostname resolvable from all the nodes even if they are in the /etc/hosts file, Why is the following task saying UNREACHABLE and from where its trying to reach ? PLAY [Refresh nova scheduler cell cache] ***************************************************************************************************************************************************** TASK [nova : Refresh cell cache in nova scheduler] ******************************************************************************************************************************************* fatal: [os2-bos-ctrl01]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Data could not be sent to remote host \"os2-bos-ctrl01\". Make sure this host can be reached over ssh: ", "unreachable": true} fatal: [os2-bos-ctrl02]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Data could not be sent to remote host \"os2-bos-ctrl02\". Make sure this host can be reached over ssh: ", "unreachable": true} fatal: [os2-bos-ctrl03]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Data could not be sent to remote host \"os2-bos-ctrl03\". Make sure this host can be reached over ssh: ", "unreachable": true}

4 5

[octavia] [lbaas] [ovs] Is octavia sr-iov supporting tunnels?
by yardalgedal＠gmail.com 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi, Openstack Team, Is new octavia sr-iov feature supporting vxlan tunnels like in ovs or it can work only with provider networks (vlan)?

3 2

[kayobe] Running seed on ansible control host
by Olaf Trygve Berglihn 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Dear list, Can someone explain how to configure kayobe to set up the seed hypervisor and seed vm on the ansible control host (where you run 'kayobe seed hypervisor host configure' and 'kayobe seed vm provision')? Thanks! -Olaf

2 5

[masakari] failures with new version of Eventlet
by Herve Beraud 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hey Masakari maintainers, Masakari is failing with new the version of Eventlet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/933257 This job failure indicates that Masakari will surely stop working correctly once this version bump will be merged, and we need that requirements bump to support newer versions of Python in OpenStack, so... Masakari is a non-voting job, so even if this job is failing, the requirement bump will proceed, but that would be better if every project is compatible and ready to go. If you need help do not hesitate to: - join us on #openstack-eventlet-removal; - join us at our next meeting (Dec 17) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Eventlet-removal#Recurring_Events. Thanks for your hard work. -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/

1 0

[horizon] Upstream weekly meeting cancelled Dec 4
by Tatiana Ovchinnikova 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

Hi team, Since half of our team is on PTO tomorrow, I am cancelling the meeting. See you all on December 11! With kind regards, Tatiana

1 0

[OSSA-2024-005] Neutron: Authorization bypassed when setting tags on Neutron networks (CVE-2024-53916)
by Jay Faulkner 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

=========================================================================== OSSA-2024-005: Authorization bypassed when setting tags on Neutron networks =========================================================================== :Date: December 03, 2024 :CVE: CVE-2024-53916 Affects ~~~~~~~ - Neutron: >=23.0.0 <23.2.1, >=24.0.0 <24.0.2, >=25.0.0 <25.0.1 Description ~~~~~~~~~~~ Tore Anderson of Redpill Linpro AS discovered that Neutron does not apply the proper policy check for changing network tags. An unprivileged tenant is able to change (add and clear) tags on network objects which do not belong to the tenant, and this action is not being subjected to the proper policy authorization check. Patches ~~~~~~~ -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936849 (2023.2/bobcat) -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936846 (2024.1/caracal) -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936843 (2024.2/dalmatian) -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/935883 (2025.1/epoxy) Credits ~~~~~~~ - Tore Anderson from Redpill Linpro AS (C, V, E, -, 2, 0, 2, 4, -, 5, 3, 9, 1, 6) References ~~~~~~~~~~ -https://launchpad.net/bugs/2088986 -http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-53916 -- Jay Faulkner OpenStack VMT

1 0

[publiccloud-sig] Reminder: next meeting December 4th (tomorrow) - 0800 UTC
by Felix Kronlage-Dammers 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

Hi everyone, This Wednesday, tomorrow, (December 4th) the next meeting of the publiccloud-sig is going to happen. We’ll be meeting at 0800 UTC here: https://meetpad.opendev.org/publiccloud-sig <https://meetpad.opendev.org/publiccloud-sig> See also here for all other details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudSIG <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudSIG> See you tomorrow! felix -- Felix Kronlage-Dammers Sovereign Cloud Stack — standardized, built and operated by many Ein Projekt der Open Source Business Alliance - Bundesverband für digitale Souveränität e.V. Tel.: +49-30-206539-205 | Matrix: @fkronlage:matrix.org | fkr(a)osb-alliance.com

1 0

[nova] Rescuing a volume-backed instance
by Francesco Di Nucci 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

Hello, I am using Openstack 2024.1 and I have issues with an instance with a corrupted FS - I wanted to start it in rescue mode, but I'm getting stuck After reading nova#1926601 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926601> , downloaded System Rescue CD and created an image with properties [otherwise it always failed with "Cannot rescue a volume-backed instance (HTTP 400)"] : openstack image create --file systemrescue-11.02-amd64.iso --disk-format iso --container-format bare --property hw_rescue_bus=virtio --property hw_rescue_device=disk systemrescuecd Then tried to rescue the instance: openstack --os-compute-api-version 2.96 server rescue --image systemrescuecd (my-instance-id) Now it fails with "Instance (my-instance-id) cannot be rescued: Driver Error: Image (my-image-id) is unacceptable: Image not in a supported format" How should I proceed? Thanks in advance -- Francesco Di Nucci System Administrator Compute & Networking Service, INFN Naples Email: francesco.dinucci(a)na.infn.it

3 3

[ironic] meeting schedule for December and end of the year holidays break
by Riccardo Pittau 03 Dec '24

03 Dec '24

Hello ironicers! Holiday season is upon us and we're close to the end of 2024. The last Ironic community meeting for this year will be held on Monday December 16th, so we have two meetings left before the break. We'll skip December 23rd and 30th and come back in 2025 on Monday January 6th. Thanks everyone for all your contributions during 2024! Ciao! Riccardo

1 0

[tc][all] OpenStack Technical Committee Weekly Summary and Meeting Agenda (2025.1/R-17)
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 02 Dec '24

02 Dec '24

Hello Stackers, This week marks the 2024.2 ("Dalmatian") release trailing deadline [1]. All projects following the cycle-trailing release model [2][3] must release their 2024.2 ("Dalmatian") deliverables by December 5, 2024. No new governance changes were merged in the past week; goal champions and volunteers continued their efforts on the cross-community goals that have been committed to [4]. As Ghanshyam Mann (gmann) highlighted in this mailing list [5], nine project teams need to address CI jobs within their repositories due to the switch of base DevStack (and some tox) jobs to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Teams can work around the problem temporarily by pinning the nodeset used to run their failing jobs to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS while they triage and resolve these issues. The Ironic and Neutron teams recently dropped functional testing with the PostgreSQL database. As highlighted at the PTG [6], there is very little motivation within OpenStack's contributor community to support PostgreSQL as a database alternative to MySQL and its derivatives with Oslo.db. The TC has clarified this in a past resolution as well [7]. We are currently identifying places within the documentation where PostgreSQL references need to be removed and aim to address these promptly. If you rely on PostgreSQL, please voice your concerns and consider dedicating time and resources to reviving testing with this database. === Weekly Meeting === TC members met last Tuesday (2024-11-26) on OFTC's #openstack-tc channel [8]. A significant portion of the discussion focused on the state of CI. Members of the Testing and Collaboration Tools SIG highlighted that much of the gate flakiness is due to jobs encountering the new rate limits on DockerHub [9]. Alternatives that may be more suitable for CI usage within open-source communities were discussed. As a result, we encourage project teams to explore these alternatives, as many open-source communities have already done. The OpenStack TC's next weekly meeting is today (2024-12-03). It will be held simultaneously via video (Zoom) and IRC (OFTC's #openstack-tc channel) at 18:00 UTC. The agenda for this meeting, along with participation links, can be found on the wiki [10]. I hope to see you there! === Governance Proposals === ==== Open for Review ==== - Retire Murano/Senlin/Sahara OpenStack-Ansible roles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/935677 - Add ansible-role-httpd repo to OSA-owned projects: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/935694 - Rework the initial goal proposal as suggested by the community: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/931254 - Resolve to adhere to non-biased language: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/934907 - Propose to select the eventlet-removal community goal: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/934936 Thank you for reading! On behalf of the OpenStack TC, Goutham Pacha Ravi (gouthamr) OpenStack TC Chair [1] 2025.1 "Epoxy" Release Schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html [2] Cycle-trailing release model: https://releases.openstack.org/reference/release_models.html#cycle-trailing [3] Cycle-trailing projects: https://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=type%3A%20trailing&i=nope&literal=nope&fi… [4] Proposed and selected community goals: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/#community-goals [5] Migrate to noble communication: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… [6] OpenStack TC PTG Notes (around line 159): https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.0f25532f564fb786a89cfe1de39b004b [7] State of community support for databases: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20170613-postgresql-status.… [8] TC Meeting IRC Log 2024-11-26: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2024/tc.2024-11-26-18.01.log.html [9] DockerHub rate limit changes: https://www.docker.com/blog/november-2024-updated-plans-announcement/ [10] TC Meeting Agenda, 2024-12-03: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee

1 0

[neutron] bug deputy report for week of 2024-11-25
by Bence Romsics 02 Dec '24

02 Dec '24

Hi All, These are the new bugs reported last week. Except the last one, each has an assignee or even a proposed fix. ovn-octavia-provider cores, please have a look at the last one! It seems valid to me, but I'm not familiar with the code base. The reporter/assignee seems to be a new contributor, may be happy to get some help from you. Medium: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2089940 [WSGI] Make ``TunnelTypeDriverBase.sync_allocations`` compatible with WSGI Fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936813 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2089661 Resource cache should be delete after port remove from br-int Fix in progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936235 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2089663 Router port device owner changed should send PORT resource UPDATE event Fix in progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/936237 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2089727 neutron-tempest-plugin-openvswitch router migration cases are not run Assigned to Yulong. RFE: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2089726 Sequential Execution of run Methods in OVN Agent Suggestion to parallelize the ovsdbapp event loop, see discussion in wip patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovsdbapp/+/936327 Stable: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2089522 [stable] 2024.1 and 2023.2, broken grenade and skip jobs due to a partial migration to um/2023.1 Fixes in progress, some merged already: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:"bug/2089522" ovn-octavia-provider: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2090782 Some requests take a lot of time to process in OVN Octavia Provider on huge loadbalancers Assigned to Aslan. Cheers, Bence

1 0

[DevStack] Fail to install devstack (stable/2024.2)
by Seongsoo Cho 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi OpenStack Community Since a few weeks ago, I've been getting an error on neutron module import when installing devstack. I still can't get rid of the error, how can I fix it? [ Error Message ] ERROR neutron return self.channel.remote_call(name, args, kwargs, ERROR neutron File "/opt/stack/data/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/oslo_privsep/daemon.py", line 215, in remote_call ERROR neutron raise exc_type(*result[2]) ERROR neutron ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'neutron.privileged.agent' ERROR neutron +lib/neutron_plugins/ovs_base:_neutron_ovs_base_setup_bridge:1 exit_trap +./stack.sh:exit_trap:540 local r=1 ++./stack.sh:exit_trap:541 jobs -p You can find the full error message from this link full error : https://pastebin.com/KEn33H1a [ Environment ] OS : Ubuntu 24.04 devstack branch : stable/2024.2 full error : https://pastebin.com/KEn33H1a world dump : https://pastebin.com/vp4Azqjg Best Regards Seongsoo -- Seongsoo Cho OpenStack Korea User Group / Community Leader IRC #seongsoocho

2 2

join to contribute
by alibasafa18＠gmail.com 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi everyone, I’m interested in contributing to Neutron. Could you please guide me on how to start understanding its codebase and logic? I have experience working with OpenStack, and I’m familiar with OVS and OVN, as well as their concepts.

2 1

[kayobe] [bifrost] Enabling and Deploying compute node
by alidot-subs Mail 30 Nov '24

30 Nov '24

Hi Everyone, Its be good experience to deploy Kayobe in all in one mode and see cirros image getting deployed and acesssible. Moving forward for multi-node deployment of baremetal machines. i tried to enable bifrost bit i doesn't seems to et enable by setting configurations in bifrost.yaml. What it takes to enable and use Bifrost using kayobe ? It may sound basic question. Thank you Ali

2 3

[cinder] What is the "official" name for Cinder in the service catalog?
by Stephen Finucane 29 Nov '24

29 Nov '24

o/ I've proposed a series of patches to "clean up" the service catalog that DevStack creates in a deployment. Currently, DevStack creates two endpoints for Cinder: one called 'cinderv3' of type 'volumev3' and another called 'cinder' of type 'block-storage'. For example: { "services": [ { "name": "cinderv3", "description": "Cinder Volume Service V3", "id": "65460706a9864e71926f13042f526aeb", "type": "volumev3", "enabled": true, "links": { "self": "http://10.0.108.50/identity/v3/services/65460706a9864e71926f13042f526aeb" } }, { "name": "cinder", "description": "Cinder Volume Service", "id": "cd406a0e296d47dca1e481e992851bb2", "type": "block-storage", "enabled": true, "links": { "self": "http://10.0.108.50/identity/v3/services/cd406a0e296d47dca1e481e992851bb2" } }, // ... ], "links": { "next": null, "self": "http://10.0.108.50/identity/v3/services", "previous": null } } They both ultimately point to the same API, the Cinder v3 API, meaning one of these endpoints is redundant. My assumption was 'block-storage' was the correct one, since that's the official service type [1], and that 'cinder' was the appropriate name since it mirrors what we use for other services (nova, neutron, keystone, glance, ...). However, tkajinam raised the point [2] that the Install Guide currently recommends use of the 'volumev3' type and that projects like Nova and Glance have an '[cinder] catalog_info' that defaults to 'volumev3'. If so, is 'block-storage' really the official service type, or is it 'volumev3'. If it is, should we be changing the Install Guide and the various config option defaults? Cheers, Stephen [1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/service-types-authority/

6 18

[docs][arch] Architecture Guide, ch. Control Plane Design
by just.me.on.reddit＠protonmail.com 29 Nov '24

29 Nov '24

I am sorry for proprietary tag - I hope it helps to narrow down the scope of this mail. Tags in order generic to more specific. Hello, If I only understand the term "cloud controller" properly these are those OpenStack services which collectively control whole cloud, inclusively those services exposed to cloud user. Cloud control can run on single hosting node, or can be distributed to a group of nodes. Please correct me if I am wrong. My role is on cloud operative side (a learner to become OS user). Architecture Guide, chapter as in this mail subject states following "It’s also possible to use virtual machines for all or some of the services that the cloud controller manages, such as the message queuing. In this guide, we assume that all services are running directly on the cloud controller." It is hard to continue the lecture of this Guide due to unclear description at following points. 1. reg. "all services are running directly on the cloud controller" Can't actually understand this statement. The "on" suggests cloud controller be hosting services in mind. Furthermore, cloud controller includes only those services acting under the goal of cloud control. Service whose major purpose is to provide functionality to cloud user won't, I suppose, be part of cloud controller. Hence, this statement might be more generic as it should be. 2. reg. "use virtual machines for all or some of the services that the cloud controller manages, such as the message queuing" Will cloud controller really mange message queuing instead of include comprise it? Which use of virtual machine exactly is meant here * placing services to virtual machine during O.S. deployment to hosting IT * the IT hosting OpenStack-based cloud? Should the former bullet apply, wasn't is said in some other Guide, abstraction level rather high, that use of virtual machines as cloud host is recommended only for test and evaluation purposes?

1 0

[openstack-ansible] : GPU computes on openstack-ansible
by Rambo Rambo 29 Nov '24

29 Nov '24

Hi Team Openstack-Ansible Openstack Victoria Release Ubuntu 20.04 I need to add computes having GPU on them. So I need recommendations on the procedure to add them and also what all configurations through openstack-ansible are required for nova_api, nova_scheduler on control node nova_api containers and compute node nova_compute configurations? Also does anyone has experience using and installing openstack service : cyborg for GPU management. Regards Rambo

3 5

[heat][horizon][octavia][oslo][qa][skyline][takcer][telemetry][zaqar] Need attention for tomorrow (Nov 29th) CI migration to Ubutnu Noble
by Ghanshyam Mann 28 Nov '24

28 Nov '24

Hello Team, As you know, we have been trying very hard to test and fix the project CI for the Ubuntu Noble migration[1] and there are 9 projects that are still failing on Noble. Check the etherpad having testing change for me information on failures: - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/migrate-to-noble The migration is planned for tomorrow (Nov 29th); request you to check/fix the failure before that; otherwise, it will break your project gate. [1] https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… -gmann

1 0

[docs][kayobe] Architecture, terms used
by just.me.on.reddit＠protonmail.com 28 Nov '24

28 Nov '24

Dear Kayoube documentation, If possible please be bit more specific at few points - document Architecture, section Networks refers to bare metal overcloud hosts, however the chapter "Hosts in the System" presents only bare metal compute hosts, nor any other text passage clarifies the term "overcloud". This way it is hard to get full understanding of term "Overcloud out-of-band network". Furthermore, if you talk about an out-of-band stuff it gets hard to see what is out-of-band without term in-band be precisely clear.

1 3