- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[neutron] Bug Deputy Report July 31 - August 06
by Lucas Alvares Gomes 08 Aug '23

08 Aug '23

Hi, This is the Neutron bug report from July 31st to August 6th. *High:* * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2029722 - Routed subnets cannot use sna -Assigned to: Alban PRATS *Medium:* * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2029335 - [centos-9-stream] jobs fails as nova-compute stuck at libvirt connect since systemd-252-16.el9 - Assigned to: Yatin * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2029419 - Add Tempest scenario to validate NIC teaming - Unassigned *Needs further triage:* * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2029420 - ovdb connections fail. out-of-sync with ovs library - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2030294 - OVN: garbled DNS responses when edns is being used - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2030295 - OVN: no DNS responses are generated for TCP queries - Unassigned Cheers, Lucas

1 0

[tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting Today on August 8, 2023
by Nikolla, Kristi 08 Aug '23

08 Aug '23

Hi all, This is a reminder that the next weekly Technical Committee meeting is to be held Today, Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 1800 UTC on #openstack-tc on OFTC IRC. Please find the agenda below: • Roll call • Follow up on past action items • rosmaita to review guidelines patch and poke at automating it • Gate health check • Unmaintained status replaces Extended Maintenance • https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/888771 • User survey question updates by Aug 18 • https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-July/034589.ht… • Open Discussion and Reviews • https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open Thank you, Kristi Nikolla

1 0

[openstack][nova] Slow provision 1 instance .
by Ha Noi 07 Aug '23

07 Aug '23

Hi everyone, We have a openstack with one region and more than 100 compute nodes. We are using ceph for block storage. I don't know why my instance was provisioned too slow: more than 1 minutes. Nova compute log: Took 56.47 seconds to build instance. So I would like to optimize and speed up instance build time. Thanks and Best Regards

2 7

[tacker] Cancelling IRC meetings
by Yasufumi Ogawa 07 Aug '23

07 Aug '23

Hi team, I'd like to skip the next two weekly meetings becaseu I'm not available today, nothing new issues from the last week and next week is a week holiday for many of us. Thanks, Yasufumi

1 0

instance memory save and restore
by Tony Liu 07 Aug '23

07 Aug '23

Hi, VMWare vCenter has such feature to snapshot/save instance memory along with disk. Then instance can be reverted to that snapshot later when needed. OpenStack doesn't seem to support it. Any plan to work on that? Actually, I'm looking for the motivation/requirement to for that feature. Typically, we snapshot/backup storage, then restore the storage and restart/reboot the host/instance. Would that be sufficient? I think there will be a chance of inconsistence between memory and storage. That's why we may need to save the state of both memory and storage. Does that make sense? Any opinions is welcome. Thanks! Tony

2 1

[horizon][yoga][kolla-ansible][domain] list project created by a specific user
by James Leong 06 Aug '23

06 Aug '23

Hi all, Is it possible to list only projects that are created by the respective user. For example, user A created project 1, and project 2. I do not want user B to be able to view project 1, and project 2 other than the project created by user B. Apart from that, is there a way to allow users to switch between default domain to another domain via openstack dashboard (horizon)? Best, James

1 0

[horizon][keystone][kolla-ansible][domain][policies][yoga] Allow user to access different domain
by James Leong 05 Aug '23

05 Aug '23

Hi everyone, I am curious if a user from the default domain can access a different domain. For instance, the cloud admin created multiple domains and used the below command to add a user to a new domain other than the default one. "openstack role add --user test --domain test member" As a user with a member role, I am not able to see the list of the domains associated with the user account. I will only be able to see it on the admin side. Can member roles be allowed to view domains they are in? Best, James

1 0

[openstack][nova] Slow provision 1 instance . (Ha Noi)
by Karl Kloppenborg 05 Aug '23

05 Aug '23

Hi Han, Can you give us some more information? Where is the delay? Is it in volume building, allocation selection? Spawning? Etc. The VM instantiation process has a number of us processes that can all slow down at scale for different reasons. I doubt it is the actual spawning or allocation stage, likely a ceph/cinder building stage, especially if it’s copying data via glance to a volume. Thanks, Karl.

1 0

How to add Audit middleware in placement-api
by Pureewat Kaewpoi 04 Aug '23

04 Aug '23

Dear Community ! According to this document (https://docs.openstack.org/keystonemiddleware/yoga/audit.html) It say, I have to add "audit" middleware into api-paste.ini file. But placement api It not have api-paste.ini and It looks like placement calling middleware in this file (https://opendev.org/openstack/placement/src/branch/master/placement/deploy.…) As I understand I have to change some code to use audit middleware ? Or Just create api-paste.ini for placement-api and config wsgi to use this paste ? Best Regards, Pureewat

1 0

[openvswitch][neutron] firewall_driver openvswitch in production
by Satish Patel 03 Aug '23

03 Aug '23

Folks, Who is running the OVS firewall driver (firewall_driver = openvswitch) in production and are there any issues with running it which I may not be aware of? We are not yet ready for OVN deployments so have to stick with OVS. LinuxBridge is at the end of its life trying to get rid of any dependency. [securitygroup] firewall_driver = openvswitch

2 2

[placement][sdk] How to debug HTTP 502 errors with placement in DevStack?
by Stephen Finucane 03 Aug '23

03 Aug '23

We recently merged support for placement traits in openstacksdk. Since then, we've seen an uptick in failures of various functional jobs [1]. The failure is always the same test: openstack.tests.functional.placement.v1.test_trait.TestTrait.test_resource_pr ovider_inventory That test simply creates a new, custom trait and then attempts to list all traits, show an individual trait, and finally delete the trait. The failure occurs during the first step, creation of the custom trait: openstack.exceptions.HttpException: HttpException: 502: Server Error for url: https://10.209.100.9/placement/traits/CUSTOM_A982E0BA1C2B4D08BFD6D2594C6783… , Bad Gateway: response from an upstream server.: The proxy server received an invalid: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu) Server at 10.209.100.9 Port 80: Additionally, a 201 Created: 502 Bad Gateway: error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. I've looked through the various job artefacts and haven't found any smoking guns. I can see placement receive and reply to the request so it would seem something is happening in between. *Fortunately*, this is also reproducible locally against a standard devstack deployment by running the following in the openstacksdk repo: OS_TEST_TIMEOUT=60 tox -e functional-py310 -- \ -n openstack/tests/functional/placement/v1/test_trait.py \ --until-failure Does anyone have any insight into what could be causing this issue and have suggestions for how we might go about debugging it? As things I haven't a clue 😔 Cheers, Stephen [1] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstacksdk-functiona…

2 2

[magnum][openstack-ansible][k8s] kube_masters CREATE_FAILED
by Satish Patel 03 Aug '23

03 Aug '23

Folks, I am running the Xena release and fedora-coreos-31.X image. My cluster is always throwing an error kube_masters CREATE_FAILED. This is my template: openstack coe cluster template create --coe kubernetes --image "fedora-coreos-35.20220116" --flavor gen.medium --master-flavor gen.medium --docker-storage-driver overlay2 --keypair jmp1-key --external-network net_eng_vlan_39 --network-driver flannel --dns-nameserver 8.8.8.8 --labels="container_runtime=containerd,cinder_csi_enabled=false" --labels kube_tag=v1.21.11-rancher1,hyperkube_prefix=docker.io/rancher/ k8s-new-template-31 Command to create cluster: openstack coe cluster create --cluster-template k8s-new-template-31 --master-count 1 --node-count 2 --keypair jmp1-key mycluster31 Here is the output of heat stack [root@ostack-eng-osa images]# heat resource-list mycluster31-bw5yi3lzkw45 WARNING (shell) "heat resource-list" is deprecated, please use "openstack stack resource list" instead +-------------------------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+----------------------+ | resource_name | physical_resource_id | resource_type | resource_status | updated_time | +-------------------------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+----------------------+ | api_address_floating_switch | | Magnum::FloatingIPAddressSwitcher | INIT_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | api_address_lb_switch | | Magnum::ApiGatewaySwitcher | INIT_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | api_lb | 99e0f887-fbe2-4b2f-b3a1-b1834c9a21c2 | file:///openstack/venvs/magnum-24.5.1/lib/python3.8/site-packages/magnum/drivers/common/templates/lb_api.yaml | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | etcd_address_lb_switch | | Magnum::ApiGatewaySwitcher | INIT_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | etcd_lb | d4ba15f3-8862-4f2b-a2cf-53eafd36d286 | file:///openstack/venvs/magnum-24.5.1/lib/python3.8/site-packages/magnum/drivers/common/templates/lb_etcd.yaml | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | kube_cluster_config | | OS::Heat::SoftwareConfig | INIT_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | kube_cluster_deploy | | OS::Heat::SoftwareDeployment | INIT_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | kube_masters | 9ac8fc3e-a7d8-4eca-90c6-f66a8e0c43f0 | OS::Heat::ResourceGroup | CREATE_FAILED | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | kube_minions | | OS::Heat::ResourceGroup | INIT_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | master_nodes_server_group | 19c9b300-f655-4db4-b03e-ea1479c541db | OS::Nova::ServerGroup | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | network | a908f229-fe8f-4ab8-b245-e8cf90c1b233 | file:///openstack/venvs/magnum-24.5.1/lib/python3.8/site-packages/magnum/drivers/common/templates/network.yaml | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | secgroup_kube_master | 79e6b233-1a18-48c4-8a4f-766819eb945f | OS::Neutron::SecurityGroup | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | secgroup_kube_minion | 2a908ffb-15bf-45c5-adad-6930b0313e94 | OS::Neutron::SecurityGroup | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | secgroup_rule_tcp_kube_minion | 95779e79-a8bc-4ed4-b035-fc21758bd241 | OS::Neutron::SecurityGroupRule | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | secgroup_rule_udp_kube_minion | 2a630b3e-51ca-4504-9013-353cbe7c581b | OS::Neutron::SecurityGroupRule | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | | worker_nodes_server_group | d14b0630-95fa-46dc-81e3-2f90e62c7943 | OS::Nova::ServerGroup | CREATE_COMPLETE | 2023-08-01T20:55:49Z | +-------------------------------+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+----------------------+ I can ssh into an instance but am not sure what logs I should be chasing to find the proper issue. Any kind of help appreciated

3 5

[cloudkitty] InfluxDB version 1.8.10
by Kaster, Jörn 03 Aug '23

03 Aug '23

Hello together, we have deployed OpenStack with the standard kolla-ansible toolset. Within is included the rating component cloudkitty with prometheus and InfluxDB. The InfluxDB version that is deployed with kolla-ansible is 1.8.10 [2021-10-11]. The actual newest InfluxDB version is 2.7.1 [2023-04-28]. Are there any plans to migrate in the near future to the newest version? I couldn't find any informations on InfluxDB Sites if the 1.8 branch is supported anymore. It seems not like described in Point 2.4 of [1]. [1] https://www.influxdata.com/legal/support-policy/ [https://images.ctfassets.net/o7xu9whrs0u9/fn7Q8NJ8ctkA2FOf8DPjW/e2c782d7edb…]<https://www.influxdata.com/legal/support-policy/> Support Policy | InfluxData<https://www.influxdata.com/legal/support-policy/> InfluxData Support Program describes InfluxData’s current support offerings and support policies for the Software and Subscription Services. www.influxdata.com

2 3

[ptl][osc][sdk] openstackclient/sdk "service cores"
by Brian Rosmaita 02 Aug '23

02 Aug '23

Hello Stackers, At the Vancouver 2023 Forum, Artem and Stephen proposed adding individual OpenStack project cores as "service cores" for the python-openstackclient and openstacksdk projects.[0] This will give -2..+2 review powers to subject matter experts for osc/sdk changes affecting particular openstack components, and hopefully speed up the reviewing process. The idea is that service-cores will verify that the cli/sdk code is correct for their particular openstack component, and the "regular" osc/sdk core team (which will have sole +W power) will ensure that changes preserve consistency across the entire osc/sdk. You can give your core team permissions to act as osc/sdk "service cores" by proposing a patch to project-config. You can use the following patch as an example: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/890346 cheers, brian [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oscsdk-vancouver-forum-2023

1 0

[SDK][OSC] Core team cleanup
by Stephen Finucane 02 Aug '23

02 Aug '23

👋️ The openstacksdk-core Gerrit team contains a number of individuals who have not contributed to SDK in at over a year. * Adrian Turjak * Dean Troyer * Doug Hellmann * Monty Taylor * Paul Belanger In addition, the python-openstackclient-core Gerrit group contains the following individuals who have not contributed to OSC in the same time period. * Dean Troyer * Doug Hellmann * Matt Riedemann * Monty Taylor So that I don't have to remember to follow-up on this in a week's time, I have gone ahead and preemptively removed these individuals from the respective groups. If you are on either list and wish to remain in the groups, please reach out to me and I'll re-add you promptly :) Alternatively, assuming these folks are indeed no longer working on SDK or OpenStack at large, thank you all for your historical contributions. As is customary with emeritus reviewers, if at a future date you wish to resume OpenStack contributions we'd be happy to re-add you to the openstacksdk-core group. Thanks, Stephen

2 1

Cinder Bug Report 2023-08-02
by Rajat Dhasmana 02 Aug '23

02 Aug '23

Hello Argonauts, Cinder Bug Meeting Etherpad <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting> Low - RBD migrate_volume code optimization <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2028793> - Status: Recently reported, no comments or fix proposed - NetApp ONTAP - Error on failover-host with REST API <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2028857> - Status: Fix proposed <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/889826> - [Pure Storage] failure to disconnect remote hosts in uniform sync rep cluster <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2029005> - Status: No comments or fix proposed Thanks Rajat Dhasmana

1 0

[openstack][neutron[nova][kolla-ansible]instance cannot ping after live migrate
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 02 Aug '23

02 Aug '23

Hello guys. I am using openstack yoga with kolla ansible. When I migrate: instance1 from host A to host B after that I cannot ping this instance(telnet also). I must restart neutron_openvswitch_agent or move this instance back to host B then this problem has gone. this is my settings: ----------------- neutron.conf ----------------- [nova] live_migration_events = True ------------------------------------------------ ----------------- nova.conf ----------------- [DEFAULT] vif_plugging_timeout = 600 vif_plugging_is_fatal = False debug = True [compute] live_migration_wait_for_vif_plug = True [workarounds] enable_qemu_monitor_announce_self = True ----------------- openvswitch_agent.ini----------------- [securitygroup] firewall_driver = openvswitch [ovs] openflow_processed_per_port = true I check nova, neutron, ops logs but they are ok. Thank you. Nguyen Huu Khoi

4 12

[tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting today on August 1, 2023
by Nikolla, Kristi 01 Aug '23

01 Aug '23

Hi all, This is a reminder that the next weekly Technical Committee meeting is to be held today (Tuesday, Aug 1, 2023) at 1800 UTC on Zoom. Use the following link to connect https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87108541765?pwd=emlXVXg4QUxrUTlLNDZ2TTllWUM3Zz09 The agenda for the meeting is: • Roll call • Follow up on past action items • tc-members to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/843457 • Unmaintained status replaces Extended Maintenance • https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/888771 • Release notes guidelines for SLURP/NON-SLURP cadence • Gate health check • Open Discussion and Reviews • https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open Thank you, Kristi Nikolla

2 2

Tap as a service on openstack with Juju and MaaS
by Jean-Bernard Altidor 31 Jul '23

31 Jul '23

Hello, I've been struggling to configure tap as a service on openstack for a few months now. I can't find any guide or anything about it. Can you suggest a method of port mirroring? I've even via the ovs bridge but I really need a way to mirror data and send it to an instance for analysis as I'm working on an IDS. Thanks in advance for any ideas ! JB

2 2

[nova] Scheduler Optimiser
by Dominik Danelski 31 Jul '23

31 Jul '23

Hello, I would like to introduce you to the tool developed under the working title "Scheduler Optimiser". It is meant to test the effectiveness of different Scheduler configurations, both weights and filters on a given list of VM orders and in a semi-realistic infrastructure. My company - CloudFerro - has been preparing in-house for the last few months and foresees publishing the project as FOSS once it reaches the MVP stage. To make the final result more useful to the community and speed up the development (and release), I humbly ask for your expertise: Are you aware of previous similar efforts? Do you notice some flaws in the current approach? What, in your opinion, are more important aspects of the infrastructure behaviour, and what can be relatively safely ignored in terms of the effect on Scheduler results/allocation? Project objectives: * Use Devstack (or another OpenStack deployer) with a real Scheduler to replay a list of compute VM orders, either real from one's infrastructure or artificially created. * Assess the effectiveness of the scheduling in various terms like: "How many machines of a given type can still be allocated at the moment?" using plug-in "success meters". In a strict sense, the project does not simulate THE Scheduler but interacts with it. * Use fake-virt to emulate huge architectures on a relatively tiny test bench. * Have as little as possible, and ideally no changes to the Devstack's code that could not be included in the upstream repository. The usage should be as simple as: 1. Install Devstack. 2. Configure Devstack's cluster with its infrastructure information like flavours and hosts. 3. Configure Scheduler for a new test case. 4. Replay VM orders. 5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 to find better Scheduler settings. * Facilitate creating a minimal required setup of the test bench. Not by replacing standard Devstack scripts, but mainly through tooling for quick rebuilding data like flavours, infrastructure state, and other factors relevant to the simulation. Outside of the scope: * Running continuous analysis on the production environment, even if some plug-ins could be extracted for this purpose. * Retaining information about users and projects when replaying orders. * (Probably / low priority) replaying actions other than VM creation/deletion as they form a minority of operations and ignoring them should not have a distinct effect on the comparison experiments. Current state: Implemented: * Recreating flavours from JSON file exported via OpenStack CLI. * Replaying a list of orders in the form of (creation_date, termination_date, resource_id (optional), flavor_id) with basic flavour properties like VCPU, RAM, and DISK GB. The orders are replayed consecutively. * Plug-in success-rater mechanism which runs rater classes (returning quantified success measure) after each VM add/delete action, retains their intermediate history and "total success" - how it is defined is implementation dependent. First classes interacting with Placement like: "How many VMs of flavours x (with basic parameters for now) can fit in the cluster?" or "How many hosts are empty?". Missing: * Recreating hosts, note the fake-virt remark from "Risks and Challenges". * Tools facilitating Scheduler configuration. * Creating VMs with more parameters like VGPU, traits, and aggregates. * (Lower priority) saving the intermediate state of the cluster during simulation i.e. allocations to analyse it without rerunning the experiment. Currently, only the quantified meters are saved. * Gently failing and saving all information in case of resource depletion: close to completion, handling one exception type in upper layers is needed. * More success meters. Risks and Challenges: * Currently, the tool replays actions one by one, it waits for each creation and deletion to be complete before running success raters and taking another order. Thus, the order of actions is important, but not their absolute time and temporal density. This might skip some side-effects of a realistic execution. * Similarly, to the above, fake-virt provides simple classes that will not reproduce some behaviours of real-world hypervisors. An explicit Scheduler avoids hosts that had recently failed to allocate a VM, but most likely fake-virt will not mock such behaviour. * Fake-virt should reproduce a real diverse infrastructure instead of x copies of the same flavour. This might be the only, but very important change to the OpenStack codebase. If successful, it could benefit other projects and tests as well. Even though the list of missing features is seemingly larger, the most important parts of the program are already there, so we hope to finish the MVP development in a relatively short amount of time. We are going to publish it as FOSS in either case, but as mentioned your observations would be very much welcome at this stage. I am also open to answering more questions about the project. Kind regards Dominik Danelski

3 3

[neutron] bug deputy report for week of 2023-07-24
by Bence Romsics 31 Jul '23

31 Jul '23

Hi All, We had the following new bugs in the last week or so: Unassigned: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028651 [ovn] IPv6 VIPs broken with ML2/OVN * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028442 Support DNS for ovn_{nb,sb}_connection * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028285 [unit test][xena+] test_port_deletion_prevention fails when runs in isolation Likely valid and high, but my dvr-fu is weak. dvr folks, please have a look: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028795 Restarting OVS with DVR creates a network loop fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/889752 High: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028185 Large number of FIPs causes slow sync_routers response fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/888915 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028846 FIP PF don't works with vlan tenant network and ovn backend fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/889871 Medium: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028161 [ovn-octavia-provider] FIP not included into LogicalSwitchPortUpdate event handler method fix merged on master, backports proposed: https://review.opendev.org/q/Ibee3906e8e9575fba7811e989e3e111a026ce45b Low: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028724 neutron should forbid configuring agent_down_time that is known to crash due to CPython epoll limitation fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/889373 RFE: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028660 [fwaas][rfe] support list type of port_range for firewall rule Incomplete: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028338 Router with l3_agent state unknown Invalid: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2028544 dhcp agent binding count greather than dhcp_agents_per_network Cheers, Bence (rubasov)

1 0

[OSA] Failover at the storage level
by Murilo Morais 29 Jul '23

29 Jul '23

Good morning everybody! I'm trying to raise a scenario with redundancy at the storage level. I'm using CEPH with RBD-mirror. Cinder has a pretty clear documentation about it, but I didn't find anything about Glance and the "nova_libvirt_images_rbd_pool" and the "cinder_service_backup_driver". What would be the best approach? Only use Cinder with Mirror? If by chance the "nova_libvirt_images_rbd_pool" dies, if you are using config-drive the disk will die, correct? In this case, would it be better to leave local? I can't see what would be the best scenario for Failover cases with OSA. Thanks in advance!

2 1

[openstack-helm] [ceph deployment failed] error:- MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "ceph-client-admin-keyring" secret "ceph-client-admin-keyring" not found
by Viswanath Ediga 29 Jul '23

29 Jul '23

Team, I am trying to deploy openstack using OSH. I am following documentation https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-helm/latest/install/multinode.html I am getting error while "Deploying ceph" phase. container creation is failing. Below is the error that I see in POD description Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Warning FailedMount 24m (x73 over 3h7m) kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[ceph-client-admin-keyring], unattached volumes=[], failed to process volumes=[]: timed out waiting for the condition Warning FailedMount 4m18s (x99 over 3h9m) kubelet MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "ceph-client-admin-keyring" : secret "ceph-client-admin-keyring" not found Regards, Any help is appreciated. Kasi Viswanath

1 0

[manila] Collaborative Review session on resource locks
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 28 Jul '23

28 Jul '23

Hello Zorillas and other interested stackers, We're hosting a collab-review session on the changes pertaining to resource locks [1]. These changes are being pursued for the 2023.2/Bobcat release. The collab-review meeting will be at 1530 UTC on Thursday, Aug 3rd 2023 (gcal [2]). The meeting link will be published on the etherpad closer to the event, and shared during the IRC meeting that begins at 1500 UTC on the same day. [3] A reminder for the unfamiliar, a "collab-review" is a regular activity that the team does where patch authors provide a walkthrough of the code changes on a virtual community meeting and answer questions real time. This has helped us speed up reviews in past cycles. While the intention is to brainstorm synchronously, we will reflect all feedback - big and small, on Gerrit for posterity. In addition, the meeting call will be recorded, and the recording will be made available on the community's Youtube channel. [4] Hoping to see you there! Goutham [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-allow-locking-shares-against-deletion [2] https://red.ht/manila-bobcat-collab-review [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_Meeting [4] https://www.youtube.com/@openstackmanila

1 0

[charms][sunbeam] Proposing Guillaume Boutry for charms-core
by James Page 28 Jul '23

28 Jul '23

Hi All Guillaume has been working on the Sunbeam Charms for the last few months and has proven an able reviewer and contributor to the charms; we need to dis-entangle the sunbeam project charms from the main openstack charms set but until that work is completed I'd like to propose Guillaume as a member of the charms-core team. Cheers James

3 3