- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[neutron] bug deputy report of week 2023-10-30
by Bence Romsics 06 Nov '23

06 Nov '23

Hi Team, We only had a handful of new bug reports last week: Unassigned: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2041861 [ovn] instance in a shared network owned by another project is unreachable via floating IP * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2042647 doc: Options described in "DHCP High-availability" are outdated Invalid: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2042089 neutron : going to shared network is working, going back not * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2042598 neutron_server container suspended in health:starting state Cheers, Bence (rubasov)

1 0

neutron_server suspended in heath:starting
by Bursztynowski Dariusz 03 Nov '23

03 Nov '23

I've installed OpenStack (zed) on a Raspberry Pi cluster using kolla-ansible (version tagged for zed), and all containers are healthy except the neutron_server which is suspended in 'health: starting' state. Network related part of OpenStack seems not to work (snippet form running init-runonce): Configuring neutron. HttpException: 503: Server Error for url: http://192.168.1.60:9696/v2.0/routers, No server is available to handle this request.: 503 Service Unavailable. However, at least some commands not related to networking seem to work as expected (e.g., I can create an image which is reported by openstack image list as 'active'). There are four Raspberry Pi 4B in the cluster (2 x 4GB RAM and 2 x 8GB RAM). They run Debian 11 (bullseaye). Kolla-ansible has been used for the installation strictly following the guidelines form https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/zed/user/quickstart.html. Notably, I'm using a specific (weird?) configuration of networking on my Pis to mimic two network interfaces on each host as kolla-ansible expects. These are provided as interfaces of veth pairs (more details on that can be found in my report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2042598) Is it possible that this setup rises problems? I've already contacted OpenStack folks and they see no evident symptoms of neutron bug, suggesting a problem with deployment. Reported a bug to kolla-ansible here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/2042372, but do not know how fas they react there. I could try to install other versions but maybe there's a smarter ways to cope with the problem. Any suggestion will be welcome.

3 2

Provision of 100 HP ProLiant servers
by Leszek Szczepanowski 03 Nov '23

03 Nov '23

Hi all, I have the following use case: I need to install Openshift on 100 HP ProLiant servers, those are HP DL360 Gen10+. They are mounted in the racks, with factory settings. So, BIOS settings are default, as well as RBSU, RAID configs and ILO (ILO5). Is it possible to provision them using Openstack? Set a few parameters into ILO, into RBSU/BIOS, set up RAID controller disks (MegaRAID), and then put some ISO image and boot it? Or, maybe even better: create an Openshift cluster similar to how we do it with cloud providers? I have done this for years manually, via ILO WebUI + HTML5 console, but I'm actually tired of this. Can it be somehow automated? -- Leszek A. Szczepanowski twinsen(a)mspanc.net

4 3

[charms] Nominating Utkarsh Bhatt for charms-ceph-core
by Peter Sabaini 03 Nov '23

03 Nov '23

Hello all, I would like to nominate Utkarsh Bhatt for charms-ceph-core. Utkarsh has worked for the Ceph charms team for 1.5 years now and has provided many contributions to the charms, especially to the Ceph charms[0]. I know him as a diligent and enthusiastic contributor and hope you will support his nomination. Thanks, peter. [0] https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:utkarsh.bhatt%2540canonical.com

4 3

[neutron] Drivers meeting cancelled
by Brian Haley 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

Hello Neutrinos: Due to the lack of agenda, Friday's drivers meeting is cancelled. Have a nice weekend! -Brian

1 0

[ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster
by Forrest Fuqua 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

Hi there, I'm currently exploring some strategies and seeking advice on the deployment and layout of services on an 8-node cluster. Each node is equipped with dual AMD EYPC 7702s, two 100G Links, and 2TB of RAM. Additionally, I've set up two 13TB NVME drives in a Ceph configuration for each node. At present, the setup involves one management node, while the others are dedicated to running Nova, Neutron, Glance, and Cinder. The workload, while fairly basic, involves handling substantial numbers. It's primarily used for one-off research projects and a few classes, serving around 60 end users. The most demanding scenario occurs during cybersecurity competitions when we need to deploy 3100 VMs at once. When this is spread out over a few days, it's manageable. However, there's a risk of overloading the system, leading to DiskIO issues and Database inconsistencies. Currently, I'm utilizing Kolla for deployment, and I've shared my configurations on this GitHub repository: Link to Configs<https://github.com/RIT-GCI-CyberRange/openstack-configs>. I'd greatly appreciate any insights or advice on optimizing this setup to handle the peak workload more efficiently and prevent potential performance issues. Thanks in advance for your help!

3 7

Call for Writers or OpenInfra Live Participants
by Kristin Barrientos 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

Hi everyone, Do you have a topic that you would like to discuss on OpenInfra Live or Superuser? We’d love to hear from you. Please reach out to me via email or IRC if you have any ideas and we can talk next steps. Thanks, Kristin Barrientos IRC: @kbarrientos:matrix.org Marketing Coordinator OpenInfra Foundation

1 0

[nova][ptg] 2024.1 Caracal PTG summary
by Sylvain Bauza 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

(sorry folks, was working on other urgencies hence the late summary) Again, as every cycle I say, that's a wrap ! Thanks to all the contributors that were around, we were more than 10 everyday, woohoo ! As a reminder (like every cycle ;-) ), please don't open the main etherpad link [1] if you use a Web browser with an automatic translation modification feature. If you do it, then it would internally translate all the phrases directly in the etherpad as if you were directly modifying the etherpad by yourself. Please also make sure you don't accidentally remove or modify lines. In order to prevent any misusage, this etherpad is a read-only copy of the main one : https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.02f889c0423aa279a3fa8e136becad10 Anyway, let's stop discussing about etherpad, and lemme provide you the summary : (oh and I could be wrong for explaining some stuff, no worries, just reply in here if so) (please also grab a coffee or whatever else, you may need it) ### Operator hour ### (read-only etherpad for this here https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.06c38397f2cdd81380649312f032b22f) So, we had around 4-5 operators for this operator hour, lovely. This is what we discussed : # flavors explosion for public clouds Basically, there are multiple usecases here : this is hard to discover flavor properties except by looking up the description, but this is also difficult to filter filters based on some properties since they can be different across clouds. What we agreed (as a start) : - Glance metadefs concept [2] could help to provide a catalog of flavor properties definition if operators were using it. - Nova could provide some new API microversion for filtering flavors based on a request of standard traits and/or resources (those queried within minimum and/or maximum bars). We don't know yet who could be the owner of such a specification, contributors welcome. - Another feature could be "Nova, tell me whether my flavor could have some candidates ?" but again, we need hands on deck. # Nova could get a better housekeeping system for orphaned resources # (I'm literally paraphrasing the topic name) OK, so, after discussing with the operator, we eventually found two use-cases : - as an operator, I'd like nova to magically adopt a compute node coming from elsewhere (say a region or another nova deployment). Long story short (lookup the etherpad for more details), the winning strategy that we could implement would be : #1 adopt a whole separate nova cell by using a specific nova-manage command that would create records on the target nova-api DB based from the records from the source api DB. The operator was happy with working on a POC and discussing with the nova community to make it a quickwin. #2 live-migrate my instances between cells. Well, that one is more difficult to implement, so we could punt this until #1 is implemented. - as an operator, I sometimes need to rebuild a compute OS. Well, on that one, we discussed it further more in terms of "project cleanup". Again, long story short, we went into explaining to use 'OSC project cleanup' [3] feature that'd do the job. # I want to be able to detach my root volume Well, that one wasn't really discussed, but the topic was filled in the etherpad. No real owner of such feature request, which absolutely requires a large community design discussion since resolving this isn't trivial (and we probably need to do some trade-offs in terms of guest support). Anyway, if you read those lines and you do care of such usecase, please understand that you need to associate resources and come by the community to bring them. I, as PTL, can help providing some mentoring and onboarding if needed. ### Cross-project meetings ### We had two cross-project sessions, one with Neutron and one with Cinder. # Neutron cross-project session We only discussed one topic, but a very important one : how Neutron would feel if Nova starts to require some optional Neutron API extensions ? :-) Eventually, what we agreed with Neutron is : - Nova will deprecate by Caracal the legacy codepath that doesn't use multiple port binding and provide a LOG.warning - Nova will delete this ^ in the E* release - Sean will provide a nova blueprint explaining which API extensions will be mandatory by Nova but also he will provide a neutron rfe bug report for that. - Eventually, we'll provide release notes and a ML thread for explaining all of this (we being Brian and me) # Cinder cross-project sessions We had two sessions, one in Wednesday, the other in Friday.. Please look at both [4] and [5] for knowing the summary for each of them. ### Bobcat retrospective and Caracal planning ### 17 blueprints were approved, 9 of them landed, one of them got reverted due to late issues discovered with OSC. 34 contributors this cycle, less than previously (mostly less on-off contributors). The list of untriaged bugs exploded, but some of our awesome contributors did a very late scrubbing, so now we're down to 30, huzzah. What we agreed at the PTG : - we gonna abandon the review-priority Gerrit label in favor of using an etherpad for both feature and bugs cycle tracking (we were already doing etherpad tracking for approved blueprints implementation patches) - that cycle tracking etherpad will provide a section for proposing patches, and another section only written by Nova PTL containing a scrubbed list of changes ready to review. Process to be further documented later (when our PTL eventually has time to do it) - PTL will review every approved spec to ensure that the testing requirements are reasonably defined Please also take care of our approved Caracal planning (I'll propose a release patch to add those deadlines into the main Caracal schedule page) : - Spec freeze at the second milestone - Spec review days on Tuesdays of the weeks R-21 and R-17 - Implementation review days on Tuesdays of the weeks R-20 and R-12 ### EOLing our unmaintained branches ### - bauzas will propose a patch for EOLing Ussuri - We'll defer until next cycle to see whether we drop Victoria and Wallaby ### SLURP cadence impact and curating Caracal ### - We are bumping our libvirt minimums early this cycle to Ubuntu Jammy versions - We will also update our next minimum versions later this cycle based on the numbers of the next Ubuntu 24.04 LTS release (once a beta build is available). - we'll forward port our Bobcat deprecation notices in the Caracal release notes - we end up merging all the required bits (mostly ORM changes) for preparing the SQLA 2.0 upgrade in a later release - we'll remove vmwareapi and hyperv support in Caracal - we agreed for the virt drivers removals to not provide an API microversion on the specific API endpoints and rather return a HTTP400 ### python tooling we could use ### - We agreed on using sphinx-lint, making the code changes having doc job to use it. - We agreed on testing codespell tool with the pep8 job and eventually either keep it or remove it depending on whether it finds many false positives - We agreed on reviewing the pyupgrade patches as a try with no clear promises. ### Planning new features ### - the Healthchecks spec is going to be reproposed this cycle, some implementation details about how to do RPC checks have to be identified - we agreed on exposing the value of the pinned AZ in GET /servers/<uuid>/details - we agreed on doing kind of soft-[anti-]affinity for AZs using instance groups (either thru new policies or some new concept of 'destination') - PCI device affinity for libvirt driver seems an effort to be resumed. Testing this is a concern but we'll discuss this in the spec - PCI devices notion of grouping (imagine two PCI devices for the same card, you'll get the idea) seems an interesting usecase, worth spec'ing. We could imagine the notion of a single placement unit being 'pci group' with one PCI device being the main object to track. The neighbouring aspect seems hard to implement so we reserve it for later. - Having console timeouts on token expiry seems a nice security feat, reviews welcome on the spec. - VGPU efforts will be huge this cycle. More to be discussed below in a specific section ### Caracal cleanups, bugs and follow-ups ### - we really want to change our default quota system to use unified limits soon but there are some upgrade concerns with flavors that contain placement resource classes that require ourselves to do further work with oslo.limits or Keystone in order to not break operators that chose to use the unified limits driver. We could also add some checking in the nova-manage migration tool that would emit a warning if resource classes were used. - our config with images_types_backend, use_cow_images and force_raw_images is confusing and errorprone. We agreed on fixing some migration bug as a backportable way, but also deprecating use_cow_images and force_raw_images while providing meaningful config options instead. - we're mixing IP addresses and URLs usage in our configs, we could be more consistent. What we agreed on that is that a new migration_inbound_addr config sounds cool, defaulting to the my_ip config value but being able to provide a FQDN or hostname too ### The VGPU efforts ### - we're actively working on providing upstream testing for mdevs, thanks to the mtty kernel samples framework. mtty live-migration is currently an ongoing patch, but someone proposed to backport this into a custom kernel built on purpose for our usage. Either way, mtty testing will be done as much as possible in nova-next but we could create a new periodic/experimental target for targeting new features like live-migration. - we plan to do mdev live-migration this cycle. There are lots of limitations that we need to document but this sounds doable. We could add some pre-live-migration check about mdev types and this would require some object change. We may also need to persist the mdev/allocation relationship but that will be discussed in the spec - nvidia is going to drop vfio-mdev for their SR-IOV GPUs and use a specifc vfio-pci variant driver. This is a very premature task and our caracal efforts will consist in identifying the necessary nova adaptations. One is already identified (adding a managed flag) and we agreed on a solution. - we're gonna change how nova creates the mediated devices by rather defining a libvirt nodedevice which will also facilitate operator maintenance (they could just mdevctl or define udev rules) - we agreed on deprecating the config default that allows you to only specify mdev types without specifying the addresses. - SRIOV GPUs currently leak some unused VFs into Placement, leading to capacity issues [6]. We could address that problem by either making the device's explicit definition mandatory or adding a new config option that would specify the number of VFs to use per type. - some other bugs were discussed with an operator who was present. We agreed on doing further testing to clearly identify problems, and some patches are already up for reviews (like the evacuate case or the multi-create limitation) but also require some rebase. Anyway, I guess I'm done now. Thanks for having read until that point and I hope your coffee (or tea) was good. HTH and thanks, -Sylvain (on behalf of the whole Nova community) [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-pt g (please remove the empty char between 'pt' and 'g') [2] https://docs.openstack.org/glance/latest/user/metadefs-concepts.html [3] https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/cli/command-object… [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderCaracalPTGSummary#Cross_project_with_… [5] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderCaracalPTGSummary#Nova_Cinder_cross_p… [6] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2041519

1 0

[sunbeam][ptg] vPTG summary
by James Page 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

HI All The Sunbeam project participated in the vPTG last week; here is a short summary of the topics that we discussed and plans added for the Caracal cycle. # Full Cycle Retro ## Celebrations - Significant reduction in both the time taken to bootstrap and resize a deployed cluster. - Switch from Antelope to Bobcat in the charms was smooth and relatively quick. - Many new plugins delivered during the cycle, enabling lots more of the OpenStack ecosystem - telemetry, magnum, heat, barbican and designate. - Refactoring of ops-sunbeam to support both k8s and machine charms was a success - Documentation starting to look great and developing lots of depth - Lots of contributions to the open source tools we depend on including snapd, Juju (inc terraform provider), microk8s, traefik and prometheus charms. ## Learnings - Switching to Bobcat for snaps and terraform plans took a bit longer than it should have done - most likely down to this being a largely new process for the team. - Some impact on velocity due to bugs in dependencies outside of OpenStack - Release process needs to be better documented so more of the core team can execute it. - Plugin full functional test coverage still needs some work. ## Actions - Implementation of automated functional testing for plugins - Full documentation and improved automation of the release process # Debugging Problems ## Overview We had quite an extended conversation about how we help users debug both bugs and deployment specific issues in Sunbeam; the general observability feature we're working on will help in this area once a cloud is deployed but we need some extra features to help users before this stage of the deployment is reached. sunbeam inspect is a bit lightweight still; can supplement the information gathered with more extensive information collected from microk8s so we need to document this into the bug reporting guidance. ## Actions - Improve docs topic 'Inspecting the cluster' to include more detail of collecting debug information for reporting bugs - Update the guidance for reporting bugs in Launchpad projects to help users report better more qualified bugs # Monorepo for Sunbeam Charms ## Overview With our current approach of 1:1 mapping between charms and repositories, we're going to have a similar challenge to the OpenStack Charms project when we need to effect a change across the entire charmset (bumping to a new release, updating a dependency or alike). This generates a large number of reviews, and associated costs of testing, which then need to be managed through to landing by one of the core team. Liam proposed that we look at moving to a single mono-repo for all of the charms in the project, reducing the overhead of 'batch' type operations and making it generally easier to manage this part of Sunbeam. We'd also address integrated testing of a change that impacts multiple charms without having to model cross-repo dependencies. The resource required to complete a function test would increase in size, but reduce hugely in number when compared to our current approach. We'll need to figure out tooling to determine which charms are impacted by a specific change so that we only build, test and publish charms that need to be changed, rather than the entire charmset. Some projects in the wider charm ecosystem are using this approach to good effect. ## Actions - Liam to take this idea forward early during the Caracal cycle - will need some coordination and advice from the infra team (see next topic). # Integration testing ## Overview Although the Sunbeam charms do include functional testing, it's not a complete integration test of a full Sunbeam deployment. We'd like to achieve this goal but this will require test instances with more memory than we typically get right now. We discussed that this felt linked to the idea of the mono-repo for charms as it feels unreasonable to ask for increased instance sizes for and increasing set of repositories when we could achieve better resource usage efficiency with a mono-repo. We agreed to fold this into the mono-repo work early this cycle. # Multi-node testing ## Overview All of our multi-node testing is currently not executed as part of the project CI workflows - we really need to test this part of Sunbeam as part of our gating for changes. We discussed a few ideas in this area including use of LXD containers on a big instance type or use of the 3rd party CI provided by Canonical that currently supports the OpenStack Charms project. Both might present viable routes forward and will be considered during the coming cycle. # Managing OCI artefacts references in charms ## Overview The OCI resources used by the Sunbeam K8S charms are managed within a different project; we need to be aware of when new OCI's are published so we can feed these updates into the charms and publish new charm revisions and associated OCI resources. There is some prior art on github modelled as actions to support this type of workflow but we need something that will work across that boundary into the opendev gerrit infrastructure. ## Actions - Reach out to the opendev infrastructure team as to whether there is any prior work on this type of function. # Single Container Multiple Services ## Overview We've spent quite a bit of time this cycle reducing the physical footprint of the OCI resources we use for Sunbeam. We discussed whether this might be taken further by reducing the number of containers we run in each charm - this is made possible by the fact that the OCI entry point is managed using Pebble, which supports multiple service definitions so we can run multiple daemons within the same container. We agreed to prototype this in one of the more complicated charms to see how much benefit might be achieved by taking this approach. ## Actions - POC probably using the nova-k8s charm to assess benefits. We had around 6 active participants during our session with a few others dropping in to listen in on the conversation from time to time - thankyou to all of those who contributed to our discussions and I look forward to the next (v)PTG. Cheers James Sunbeam PTL

1 0

[kolla-ansible][16.1.0] Could not load namespace_haproxy_for_cell
by Satish Patel 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

Folks, I am deploying new cloud and planning to use 2023.1 with kolla-ansible tag 16.1.0 but I hit this error and after google I found this reference bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/2039573 Very curious about the workaround here. How does it pass CI-CD if it's really a bug?

3 3

[nova][compute] HugePages question
by Satish Patel 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Folks, What are the advantages and disadvantages to enable HugePages on compute nodes? I know that HugePages improve performance of VMs because of TLB lookup etc. But if it does improve in most cases then why people why default not turning on HugePage for deployment? Just trying to find out what could go wrong if I turn on by default HugePage for all deployment?

2 2

[kolla-ansible][16.1.0] Error container timeout
by Satish Patel 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Folks, I am deploying the 2023.1 release of openstack using kolla-ansible (tag 16.1.0) . I noticed a very strange error during deployment. This is very close to this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/2038914 RUNNING HANDLER [common : Restart fluentd container] ***************************************************************************************************************************** fatal: [os1-bos-ctrl02]: FAILED! => {"Command": "dumb-init --single-child -- kolla_start", "Created": 1698865177, "HostConfig": {"NetworkMode": "host"}, "Id": "ae17d4d276fd278d15c5df03fdee70eafbff66fecbc78ae0bbae64274daa910b", "Image": "registry.example.com/kolla/fluentd:2023.1-ubuntu-jammy", "ImageID": "sha256:41752d28100fd85074d112942f843ce144df8bb023d7bdf664df0ef7be9a50ea", "Labels": {"build-date": "20231029", "kolla_version": "16.1.1", "maintainer": "Kolla Project (https://launchpad.net/kolla)", "name": "fluentd", "org.opencontainers.image.ref.name": "ubuntu", "org.opencontainers.image.version": "22.04"}, "Mounts": [{"Destination": "/etc/localtime", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/localtime", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/etc/timezone", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/timezone", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/var/lib/fluentd/data", "Driver": "local", "Mode": "rw", "Name": "fluentd_data", "Propagation": "", "RW": true, "Source": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/fluentd_data/_data", "Type": "volume"}, {"Destination": "/var/lib/kolla/config_files", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/kolla/fluentd", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/var/log/kolla", "Driver": "local", "Mode": "rw", "Name": "kolla_logs", "Propagation": "", "RW": true, "Source": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/kolla_logs/_data", "Type": "volume"}], "Names": ["/fluentd"], "NetworkSettings": {"Networks": {"host": {"Aliases": null, "DriverOpts": null, "EndpointID": "", "Gateway": "", "GlobalIPv6Address": "", "GlobalIPv6PrefixLen": 0, "IPAMConfig": null, "IPAddress": "", "IPPrefixLen": 0, "IPv6Gateway": "", "Links": null, "MacAddress": "", "NetworkID": ""}}}, "Ports": [], "State": "created", "Status": "Created", "changed": true, "msg": "Container timed out"} fatal: [os1-bos-ctrl01]: FAILED! => {"Command": "dumb-init --single-child -- kolla_start", "Created": 1698865177, "HostConfig": {"NetworkMode": "host"}, "Id": "1ca559230483b490830dc2e38791fc8c567702d3280713a6f0c7bc45f2c8a038", "Image": "registry.example.com/kolla/fluentd:2023.1-ubuntu-jammy", "ImageID": "sha256:41752d28100fd85074d112942f843ce144df8bb023d7bdf664df0ef7be9a50ea", "Labels": {"build-date": "20231029", "kolla_version": "16.1.1", "maintainer": "Kolla Project (https://launchpad.net/kolla)", "name": "fluentd", "org.opencontainers.image.ref.name": "ubuntu", "org.opencontainers.image.version": "22.04"}, "Mounts": [{"Destination": "/etc/timezone", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/timezone", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/var/lib/fluentd/data", "Driver": "local", "Mode": "rw", "Name": "fluentd_data", "Propagation": "", "RW": true, "Source": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/fluentd_data/_data", "Type": "volume"}, {"Destination": "/var/lib/kolla/config_files", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/kolla/fluentd", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/var/log/kolla", "Driver": "local", "Mode": "rw", "Name": "kolla_logs", "Propagation": "", "RW": true, "Source": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/kolla_logs/_data", "Type": "volume"}, {"Destination": "/etc/localtime", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/localtime", "Type": "bind"}], "Names": ["/fluentd"], "NetworkSettings": {"Networks": {"host": {"Aliases": null, "DriverOpts": null, "EndpointID": "", "Gateway": "", "GlobalIPv6Address": "", "GlobalIPv6PrefixLen": 0, "IPAMConfig": null, "IPAddress": "", "IPPrefixLen": 0, "IPv6Gateway": "", "Links": null, "MacAddress": "", "NetworkID": ""}}}, "Ports": [], "State": "created", "Status": "Created", "changed": true, "msg": "Container timed out"} fatal: [os1-bos-ctrl03]: FAILED! => {"Command": "dumb-init --single-child -- kolla_start", "Created": 1698865177, "HostConfig": {"NetworkMode": "host"}, "Id": "8f3599681f56695b0e809acb5645d79deb3fbb476dc7bda5d75f838f67ed085d", "Image": "registry.example.com/kolla/fluentd:2023.1-ubuntu-jammy", "ImageID": "sha256:41752d28100fd85074d112942f843ce144df8bb023d7bdf664df0ef7be9a50ea", "Labels": {"build-date": "20231029", "kolla_version": "16.1.1", "maintainer": "Kolla Project (https://launchpad.net/kolla)", "name": "fluentd", "org.opencontainers.image.ref.name": "ubuntu", "org.opencontainers.image.version": "22.04"}, "Mounts": [{"Destination": "/etc/localtime", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/localtime", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/etc/timezone", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/timezone", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/var/lib/fluentd/data", "Driver": "local", "Mode": "rw", "Name": "fluentd_data", "Propagation": "", "RW": true, "Source": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/fluentd_data/_data", "Type": "volume"}, {"Destination": "/var/lib/kolla/config_files", "Mode": "ro", "Propagation": "rprivate", "RW": false, "Source": "/etc/kolla/fluentd", "Type": "bind"}, {"Destination": "/var/log/kolla", "Driver": "local", "Mode": "rw", "Name": "kolla_logs", "Propagation": "", "RW": true, "Source": "/var/lib/docker/volumes/kolla_logs/_data", "Type": "volume"}], "Names": ["/fluentd"], "NetworkSettings": {"Networks": {"host": {"Aliases": null, "DriverOpts": null, "EndpointID": "", "Gateway": "", "GlobalIPv6Address": "", "GlobalIPv6PrefixLen": 0, "IPAMConfig": null, "IPAddress": "", "IPPrefixLen": 0, "IPv6Gateway": "", "Links": null, "MacAddress": "", "NetworkID": ""}}}, "Ports": [], "State": "created", "Status": "Created", "changed": true, "msg": "Container timed out"}

1 0

[ironic] Announcement: Future of Metalsmith
by Jay Faulkner 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hi all, Just announcing that at the vPTG, the Ironic core team came to a consensus about the future of the metalsmith project. It was originally created to improve the user experience around provisioning Ironic nodes when using Ironic's API directly. At this, it was mostly successful and has completed this task. It's our intention to work on the Ironic API and python-ironicclient to provide a similarly simple deployment user experience, even for users without nova, integrating lessons learned from the metalsmith project. To this end; we are letting the overall community know we no longer expect to add additional functionality to metalsmith. We will ensure it remains maintained and well-tested until it's functionality has been duplicated, but all new work in this area will be directed at the primary Ironic API and Ironic client projects. To this end, and as discussed at the PTG, I've proposed a change to the Metalsmith readme, notifying users of this state. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/metalsmith/+/899761 This change, or this mailing list post, is a great place to comment if you have any comments on this decision. Thanks, Jay Faulkner Ironic PTL

3 3

Cinder Bug Report 2023-11-01
by Jon Bernard 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hello Argonauts, Cinder Bug Meeting Etherpad <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting> Undecided - hitachi and OEM : output REST API token <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2040966> - Status: New - hitachi AIX as host OS type does not work <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2041784> - Status: In Progress - The 'signature_verified' parameter should not be added to image when upload volume to image <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2041793> - Status: In Progress - Missing encryption param handling in Quobyte driver <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2042102> - Status: New Thanks, -- Jon

1 0

[manila] 2024.1 Caracal PTG summary
by Carlos Silva 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hello. Here is a summary of all topics we have discussed during last week's PTG and the AIs that were a result of the discussion. Thank you to all contributors that participated. If you missed one or more sessions, we got you covered. The Manila PTG, as well as the operator hour were recorded and the videos are available in the OpenStack Manila YouTube Channel [0]. Deferred deletion ------------------------- We discussed a bug that exists and the need for a deferred deletion approach. We agreed that the deferred deletion would be ideal in case the driver needs to do multiple things in the deletion and we don't want the operators to wait. #Agreed: The service should release user quotas as soon as the driver says it is processing the deletion; and handle errors internally AI: kpdev and NetApp/SAP will look into the deferred deletion implementation and provide a spec All things CephFS -------------------------- We discussed deprecating support for "standalone" NFS-Ganesha with the CephFS/NFS driver. We've supported using a clustered Ceph NFS service since the Zed release. We've also added upgrade helpers to migrate from a standalone NFS-Ganesha service to the Ceph NFS service; this code was backported to stable/2023.1 (Antelope) Testing and stabilization: We'll continue testing cephfs/nfs with standalone NFS-Ganesha until we drop support for ganesha's DBUS mechanism from the CephFS/NFS driver. IBM is currently testing the scale, performance and stability of clustered-nfs-ganesha and both, nfs-ganesha and cephadm are being updated accordingly Mulitnode devstack ceph in CI: - devstack testing of cephfs/nfs has been stable, we're trying to run this job on stable/2023.1 - AI: ashrodri will enable ingress service with cephadm Ceph NFS upgrades The code patches for upgrading to a cephadm deployed NFS cluster were merged and backported to stable/2023.1 (Antelope). When upgrading, access rules are reapplied and export locations will indicate the preferred export path for mounting shares. Deprecating use of DBUS API with NFS-Ganesha As the clustered nfs solution is hardened, and an upgrade mechanism is invented, we want to stop supporting the use of "standalone-nfs/ganesha" server with CephFS. AI: add a deprecation warning in the Caracal cycle and communicate it in the mailing list Multiple CephFS filesystems We discussed pros/cons of using a single driver representing multiple file systems as Manila storage pools - there are not a lot of benefits to this, especially considering the ease in deployment/configuration of the manila share services currently For multi-fs environments, the user experience to mount shares with Native CephFS is poor since the export paths no longer expose the filesystem name Operators suggested that we encode the filesystem name in export location metadata so automation tools (e.g.: manila CSI plugin, nova/virtiofs) can consume it programmatically AI: Elias Wimmer will report a bug against the CephFS driver AI: Ceph driver documentation will be updated regarding multi-fs and the behavior of the driver Ceph Mon address is never re-validated [3] Today, the only way to re-export a share is by restarting the manila-share manager service. We discussed an API based trigger to the ensure shares logic that will recalculate the export locations of the shares. We agreed that this implementation should add a micro-state to the share and that the API should deny other management operations on the shares when "ensuring". AI: carloss will propose a specification to implement this change Human readable export locations ----------------------------------------------- Export locations are constructed for machines, and they do not use human friendly names. NetApp proposed user customizable export locations a few releases ago [4] We discussed the proposal, and find it is still relevant - we brainstormed using a share type extra specification for customizing a prefix to the export location names We agreed that updating the export location of a share is bound to be disruptive and will not be part of the implementation. We may consider this enhancement if there is a very strong use case AI: NetApp folks will propose updates to the lite-spec and work on the implementation Share backups --------------------- A generic NFS implementation of share backups was introduced in the previous (Bobcat) cycle We discussed a share-manager driven advantaged share backup driver implementations, as well as the data service backup driver interface Cern found that the backup driver interface called back into the data service, and the driver interface needs changes AI: Luis from Cern will update the Backup driver to decouple the data manager interface on-demand in preparation for their implementation of the restic backup driver Tech debt -------------- During the tech debt session, gouthamr walked us through some multi-release tech debt items, such as the progress on scenario tests and the implementation of mechanisms to prevent race conditions. It is a good opportunity for someone in the community to step up and do some of the work, which can be a good technical challenge. AI: Discuss the specification in weekly IRC meetings and find new owner/s Barbican integration ----------------------------- Backend data encryption has been supported for several releases in Manila, but users don't have the ability to configure their encryption keys SAP is pursuing an integration with Barbican for Manila and has worked on a specification. #Agreed: Manila should have a Barbican/Castellan API layer to interact with the keystore, and share backends shouldn't have code to interact directly with Barbican. AI: kpdev will update the proposed spec [5] also documenting the interactions with Castellan Manila/Cinder cross-project session --------------------------------------------------- We organized a cross-project session with the Cinder team to discuss a couple of things: - An enhancement to the manila volume extend API calls in the generic driver: - as the Cinder APIs evolved and Manila would benefit from it. Rajat can work on the enhancement in case the Manila contributors don't have the bandwidth. - The way DHSS=True works in Manila - we brainstormed hypothetical support in Cinder for service instances/storage virtual machines and tenant driven volume networking - We also talked about the progress both the projects achieved with respect to Secure RBAC, OpenStackClient and OpenStackSDK. Expectations while submitting features -------------------------------------------------------- We are working on documenting the process one should go through while submitting features [6]. This also covers what are the deadlines and what reviewers expect in terms of feature submission. AI: carloss will update the new documentation with a checklist that will illustrate the definition of done for a feature Howcasts -------------- This is something we have been ideating on for a while. The idea is to produce short videos that will help newcomers to the project. We have an idea of what to work on [7] and help from the community would be appreciated. AI: we'll start the work on the howcasts and try to split the load within the community members SQLAlchemy 2.0 ----------------------- stephenfin has been working on the SQLAlchemy 2.0 changes for Manila and we have made good progress so far. One of the problems to test the changes is that we need to wait a whole entire CI run that can take up to 3 hours Agreed: - We'll work with stephenfin to reduce the amount of wait time to get CI results by reducing the tests using the dummy drivers - We'll review the changes and help figure out the issues with migration of share replicas and share instances queries Tech Debt Roundup - 2; multi-release efforts that have attention --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Metadata spec We currently have metadata implemented for three resources (shares, share snapshots and share network subnets). We have open patches for access rules and export locations. AI: Update the export locations and access rules metadata changes and work on them during the Caracal cycle. OSC Support: We have parity between OSC and the manila shell client and we added a deprecation warning in the previous cycle and the removal will happen prior to the next SLURP release (E). This means that Manila's shell client will not be shipped as part of the D release. - More negative functional tests would be welcome, as we have implemented only the happy-paths during a hackathon. - AI: consider a OSC test hackathon during the Caracal release hackathon - AI: all documentation will be updated to utilize OSC in examples SDK We have completed a lot of this with the help of university students/outreachy interns. Most of the work that was pressing and features that were needed to integrate with other services were covered. AI: Continue working towards full parity between openstacksdk and manilaclient SDK Agreed: There are no plans to deprecate manilaclient SDK Share Transfers: We have share transfers between projects for DHSS=False, but we are still lacking support for DHSS=True. This is a cool technical challenge to work in Manila, and having someone willing to continue this work would be appreciated. Follow up on Resource locks ------------------------------------------ The two featureful changes for resource locks were merged in the Bobcat cycle (share resource locks and locks for access rules deletion and visibility restrictions) There are two changes yet to be merged, being the OpenStack SDK patch and the manila-tempest-plugin tests for the access rules locks. We brainstormed implementations of other resource locks, such as a visibility lock on sensitive fields of a security service, or deletion locks for snapshots, backups and replicas AI: We'll implement new resource locks opportunistically during the Caracal release Operator Hour --------------------- We have reflected over the results of the latest OpenStack user survey [9] and talked about the progress of the most requested features and also requested feedback from operators. We discussed the use cases for the disabling manila services feature, and chatted about one possible enhancement to this feature which would be to add backends as disabled and enable them later. AI: we should enhance our documentation to talk about start and stopping services, as well as the differences between stopping and disabling them. [0] https://www.youtube.com/@openstackmanila [1] https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/manila-operator/ - a replacement for TripleO [2] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/directo… (Native CephFS) [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1996793 [4] https://opendev.org/openstack/manila-specs/src/commit/baf6209da8e5b47228024… [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/898999 [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/898855 [7] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-howcasts [8] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-ptg-manila-operator-hour [9] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZM722TOX3ouP_7Cet2JdURFttTuI5ZLe/view?usp=… [10] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-ptg-manila If you have questions or would like to follow-up on any of the topics, don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you! carloss

1 0

[manila] Nov 2nd upstream meeting is cancelled
by Carlos Silva 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hello! As some of our regular contributors will be on PTO tomorrow and we are following up on all-things-ptg, we are cancelling this week's weekly meeting. The next meeting will take place next week (Nov 9th). Thanks and regards, carloss

1 0

Volumes not deleting
by Russell Stather 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hi We have a juju openstack installation and we are finding that when we delete servers the associated volume doesnt get deleted. The volume stays as showing attached to a non existent server instance. We are having to marked them as not attached in the database and then the volume delete works. Any ideas what could be wrong here? Thanks Russell

2 1

Openstack volume deletion
by Vijay Thilak S 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hi, OpenStack Kolla Ansible has been installed on Ubuntu 20 and integrated with Ceph storage. The volume associated with the instance is not being deleted by Cinder when I terminate the instance with this option (Delete Volume on Instance Delete), which is causing me problems. I need to log in to the server and run the cinder commands to manually delete the volume that is not associated with instances. I would appreciate it if you could provide a solution. Thanks, Vijay

4 10

[kolla] Cancelling weekly meeting
by Michał Nasiadka 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hello Koalas, Weekly meeting today is cancelled due to public holiday in some of the countries including Poland. Best regards, Michal

1 0

[Octavia] weekly meeting 11/1 canceled
by Gregory Thiemonge 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hi Folks Many contributors are off today (public holiday), so we are canceling this week's meeting, Thanks

1 0

RE: openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 61, Issue 1 Openstack- Instance creation
by Asma Naz Shariq 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Hi Openstack Team, When I tried to create instance in Openstack dashboard, I encountered below error: Error: Failed to perform requested operation on instance "Test-Instance", the instance has an error status: Please try again later [Error: Exceeded maximum number of retries. Exhausted all hosts available for retrying build failures for instance f8cb7bb1-64db-4242-a26a-65f3568ff4e9.]. Can anyone guide me what is the root cause for this error? Regards, -----Original Message----- From: openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 7:26 AM To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Subject: openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 61, Issue 1 Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org You can reach the person managing the list at openstack-discuss-owner(a)lists.openstack.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster (Forrest Fuqua) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 02:26:02 +0000 From: Forrest Fuqua <fffics(a)rit.edu> Subject: Re: [ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster To: Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg(a)resetdata.com.au>, "openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org" <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Message-ID: <CO6PR16MB420923931283EAF219118489D0A7A(a)CO6PR16MB4209.namp rd16.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CO6PR16MB420923 931283EAF219118489D0A7ACO6PR16MB4209namp_" I am currently doing COW images in Ceph right now, that seems to be the same thing as volume backed images, I have about 40 images I use ( I even published the set here:http://mirrors.rit.edu/oszoo/ ) Ill take a look at Openstack Helm, I've never deployed Kerb before. ________________________________ From: Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg(a)resetdata.com.au> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 8:03 PM To: Forrest Fuqua <fffics(a)rit.edu>; openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster Hi Forrest, One of the first recommendations I would suggest is to utilise volume-backed-images. https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/admin/volume-backed-image.html If you have say a set of linux and windows images, you can use this to instead of RBD imaging, ceph will snapshot from the base image the RBD and this can provision in seconds. I would also suggest (and this is completely biased because I’m on the core team) looking at OpenstackHelm – we run this at scale with many thousands of VM’s. Thanks, Karl. From: Forrest Fuqua <fffics(a)rit.edu> Date: Wednesday, 1 November 2023 at 2:15 am To: Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg(a)resetdata.com.au>, openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster In response to Karl's request, Here is last year's major load I ran: http://mirrors.rit.edu/cptc/2023/virtual-machines/1-README.txt<http://mirrors.rit.edu/cptc/2023/virtual-machines/1-README.txt> The TL;DR its a mix of Windows and Linux VMs at about 4GB of Ram, and 4vCPU at about 50 machines per team, and having up to 50 teams at a time, with all the extras support VMs at various workloads, we do about 2500 VMs just for the yearly compitations All of these VMs will be under high load since they will be under a consistent cyberattack by students. The biggest issues I've had is Ceph starts to slow down on RBD creation of a COW image and Nova will timeout the creation, If it gets too back, entries like volumes, and VMs can get stuck in weird error states of error_deleting or some other weird state (I've had Volumes stuck attached to VMs that don't exist!) At peak, Netdata was showing about 500kIOP/s across the whole cluster before it really started to go north and went into a death spiral, A single windows VM was a 4 hour boot time. Ceph started showing slow writes with up to 40s commit latency When I was running a multi-node management, the MariaDB and RabbitMQ would get super mad and start dropping messages and database issues, having a single dedicated compute node has worked well so far. but I am thinking of moving away from Kolla and going to Ansible during my summer rebuild. ________________________________ From: Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg(a)resetdata.com.au> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 6:44 PM To: Forrest Fuqua <fffics(a)rit.edu>; openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster Hi Forrest, Based on the configuration specified, I will assume that 1.8TB is assignable to VM resources, less the management node (though honestly why not just share over the cluster, doesn’t seem like it’s a production workload?) However, (1.8TB*7)*1000 = 12600GB usable ram, with no oversubscription. (roughly 180-200GB each system for host and ceph services) Therefore 12600/3100 = ~4GB ram per VM at peak load, no oversubscription. Based on the CPU arch: 128*2 threads = 256 vCPU cores (which in this model I would count as vCPU cores, there’s a LOT of contention about what defines a vCPU, there’s many camps and religious arguments on this)… However, we want some space for the host so as a general thought, I will put 250 vCPU available in this calculation. 250*7 = 1750 vCPU cores avail. There are 3100-1750 = 1,350 deficit vCPU cores. As such to make up a 1vCPU core to VM at peak workload an oversubscription would be 1.8 1750*1.8 = 3150 vCPU available. Honestly, depending on these workloads and your requirements you can probably bust this subscription ratio up more and again, I would instead share the management workloads over the cluster more and induct the first node as another compute resource. I would like to know more about the workloads, what is the flavour of each VM, Is the workload disk intensive, cpu or memory, or io? In terms of running the workload, I don’t see an obvious issue with your nova config, the allocation ratio is high but that’s not going to probably be an issue here based on the numbers I mentioned. Ensuring host reservation memory is good, which I can see you have around 128GB in reservation and ram_allocation_ratio as 1.0 will ensure no OOM scenarios. Overall, I think your settings are sane and my only comment would be to add that management node into the compute mix if you can but otherwise without knowing more on the workload, seems fine. Have you done any scale testing? Spun up a workload of 3100 VMs? ( easiest way to do this would likely be to heat template…) then run an image with a default start workload of something you want to test with. --Karl. From: Forrest Fuqua <fffics(a)rit.edu> Date: Tuesday, 31 October 2023 at 5:40 am To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Subject: [ops] Seeking Advice on Service Deployment and Layout for an 8-Node Cluster Hi there, I'm currently exploring some strategies and seeking advice on the deployment and layout of services on an 8-node cluster. Each node is equipped with dual AMD EYPC 7702s, two 100G Links, and 2TB of RAM. Additionally, I've set up two 13TB NVME drives in a Ceph configuration for each node. At present, the setup involves one management node, while the others are dedicated to running Nova, Neutron, Glance, and Cinder. The workload, while fairly basic, involves handling substantial numbers. It's primarily used for one-off research projects and a few classes, serving around 60 end users. The most demanding scenario occurs during cybersecurity competitions when we need to deploy 3100 VMs at once. When this is spread out over a few days, it's manageable. However, there's a risk of overloading the system, leading to DiskIO issues and Database inconsistencies. Currently, I'm utilizing Kolla for deployment, and I've shared my configurations on this GitHub repository: Link to Configs<https://github.com/RIT-GCI-CyberRange/openstack-configs>. I'd greatly appreciate any insights or advice on optimizing this setup to handle the peak workload more efficiently and prevent potential performance issues. Thanks in advance for your help!

1 0

OpenInfra Live: Meet the Computing Force Network Working Group Nov 2 at 9 AM (CST) / 14:00 UTC
by Kristin Barrientos 31 Oct '23

31 Oct '23

Hi everyone, This week’s OpenInfra Live episode is brought to you by the open source community. Episode: China Mobile and other 10+ organizations are driving the effort of Computing Force Network in open source. In July of 2022, organizations like, China Mobile launched the Computing Force Network (CFN) Working Group within the OpenInfra Foundation. You may be wondering, what is Computing Force Network? What open source software is CFN working group going to deliver and how are CFN and related technology going to help the infrastructure? Join us to find out. Date and time: Nov 2, 2023 at 9:00 AM CST (14:00 UTC) You can watch us live on: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slc-kOao3BY LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/events/meetthecomputingforcenetworkwor711866369563… WeChat: The recording will be posted on OpenInfra Foundation WeChat after the live stream Speakers: Qihui Zhao, Jie Niu, Xiaoqiao Geng, Changjin Wang, Jintao Wang, Lei Huang and Ildiko Vancsa Thanks, Kristin Barrientos Marketing Coordinator OpenInfra Foundation

1 0

[ironic] IntelIPMIManagement driver: Anyone using it?
by Jay Faulkner 31 Oct '23

31 Oct '23

Hi all, Ironic currently has an Intel IPMI Management driver ( https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/admin/drivers/intel-ipmi.html ), a mild enhancement over our generic IPMI driver, which adds the ability to select an Intel Speed Select Performance Profile via an Ironic automation step. Ironic cores have no knowledge of this driver being used by any deployers of Ironic. We are evaluating it for deprecation and eventual removal. If you are interested in this driver remaining in the Ironic codebase, please let us know. Please note: this is not the same as our generic IPMI driver, which supports power control, boot device management, and is not being considered anytime soon for deprecation :). If we decide to mark the driver for removal, it'll obviously remain in the codebase for a long deprecation period as is our norm. Thanks, Jay Faulkner Ironic PTL

1 0

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: Nov 1, 15utc
by Kristin Barrientos 31 Oct '23

31 Oct '23

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 15UTC, our EU+US-friendly time. You can doublecheck how that UTC time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20231004T15 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Thanks, Kristin Barrientos Marketing Coordinator OpenInfra Foundation

1 0

[blazar] Cancelling the next IRC meeting
by Pierre Riteau 31 Oct '23

31 Oct '23

Hello, I am cancelling the next Blazar IRC meeting due to being out of the office. The next meeting will be on November 16. Best wishes, Pierre Riteau (priteau)

1 0