- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[Neutron] Bug Deputy Report January 23 - 29
by Oleg Bondarev 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

Hello Neutron Team, Bug report for the week of Jan 23 is below: *High:* - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004012 - [Secure RBAC] Delete port on own network which is shared with other project is not possible Confirmed Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004015 - [Secure RBAC] Sharing Security groups don't works with new RBAC policies Edit Confirmed Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004014 - [Secure RBAC] Sharing QoS Policies don't works with new RBAC policies Confirmed Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004013 - [Secure RBAC] List QoS Policies filtered by tags is not possible with new RBAC policies Confirmed Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004017 - [Secure RBAC] List flavors don't work for regular user with new RBAC policies Confirmed Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004016 - [Secure RBAC] Cleaning shared networks fails with new RBAC policies Confirmed Unassigned *Medium:* - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2003706 - [OVN] Security group logging only logs half of the connection In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/871096 Assigned to elvira - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2003842 - [OVN] A route inferred from a subnet's default gateway is not added to ovn-nb if segment_id is not None for a subnet Invalid Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004004 - keepalived virtual_routes wrong order Triaged Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2003997 - [ovn-octavia-provider] ovn-lb with VIP on provider network not working In progress Assigned to ltomasbo *Low:* - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2003861 - Remove the CLI code from python-neutronclient Triaged Assigned to ralonsoh - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2003999 - Stateleful SG API extension should be disabled when old OVN is used In progres: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/871982, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/871983s Assigned to slaweq *Undecided:* - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2004041 - Missing flows with ovs dvr after openvswitch restart Incomplete: more info requested Unassigned Thanks, Oleg

1 0

hacluster_corosync container stuck in restarting
by Karera Tony 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

Dear Team, I installed Openstack Wallaby using kolla-ansible. Everything is fine except for the hacluster_corosync container stuck in restarting. Below are the corosync logs. Has anyone faced this issue before ? I have two controllers but this issue is on happening on one Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] kronosnet crypto initialized: aes256/sha384 Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] totemknet initialized Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [KNET ] common: crypto_nss.so has been loaded from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kronosnet/crypto_nss.so Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync notice [SERV ] Service engine loaded: corosync configuration map access [0] Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] server name: cmap Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [QB ] Could not bind AF_UNIX (): Address already in use (98) Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] withdrawing server sockets Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Can't initialize IPC Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [SERV ] Service engine 'corosync_cmap' failed to load for reason 'qb_ipcs_run error' Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 20 at service.c:356. Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine 3.0.3 starting up Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus monitoring watchdog augeas systemd xmlconf vqsim nozzle snmp pie relro bindnow Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync warning [MAIN ] Could not increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, not locking memory: Operation not permitted (1) Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [TOTEM ] Initializing transport (Kronosnet). Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] kronosnet crypto initialized: aes256/sha384 Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] totemknet initialized Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [KNET ] common: crypto_nss.so has been loaded from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kronosnet/crypto_nss.so Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [SERV ] Service engine loaded: corosync configuration map access [0] Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] server name: cmap Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [QB ] Could not bind AF_UNIX (): Address already in use (98) Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] withdrawing server sockets Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Can't initialize IPC Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [SERV ] Service engine 'corosync_cmap' failed to load for reason 'qb_ipcs_run error' Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 20 at service.c:356. Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine 3.0.3 starting up Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus monitoring watchdog augeas systemd xmlconf vqsim nozzle snmp pie relro bindnow Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync warning [MAIN ] Could not increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, not locking memory: Operation not permitted (1) Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [TOTEM ] Initializing transport (Kronosnet). Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] kronosnet crypto initialized: aes256/sha384 Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] totemknet initialized Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [KNET ] common: crypto_nss.so has been loaded from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kronosnet/crypto_nss.so Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync notice [SERV ] Service engine loaded: corosync configuration map access [0] Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] server name: cmap Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [QB ] Could not bind AF_UNIX (): Address already in use (98) Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] withdrawing server sockets Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Can't initialize IPC Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [SERV ] Service engine 'corosync_cmap' failed to load for reason 'qb_ipcs_run error' Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 20 at service.c:356. Regards Regards Tony Karera

1 0

hacluster_corosync container stuck in restarting
by Karera Tony 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

Dear Team, I installed Openstack Wallaby using kolla-ansible. Everything is fine except for hacluster_corosync container stuck in restarting. Below are the corosync logs. Has anyone faced this issue before ? Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] kronosnet crypto initialized: aes256/sha384 Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] totemknet initialized Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [KNET ] common: crypto_nss.so has been loaded from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kronosnet/crypto_nss.so Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync notice [SERV ] Service engine loaded: corosync configuration map access [0] Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] server name: cmap Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [QB ] Could not bind AF_UNIX (): Address already in use (98) Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] withdrawing server sockets Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Can't initialize IPC Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [SERV ] Service engine 'corosync_cmap' failed to load for reason 'qb_ipcs_run error' Jan 30 08:19:42 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 20 at service.c:356. Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine 3.0.3 starting up Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus monitoring watchdog augeas systemd xmlconf vqsim nozzle snmp pie relro bindnow Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync warning [MAIN ] Could not increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, not locking memory: Operation not permitted (1) Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [TOTEM ] Initializing transport (Kronosnet). Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] kronosnet crypto initialized: aes256/sha384 Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] totemknet initialized Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [KNET ] common: crypto_nss.so has been loaded from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kronosnet/crypto_nss.so Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [SERV ] Service engine loaded: corosync configuration map access [0] Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] server name: cmap Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [QB ] Could not bind AF_UNIX (): Address already in use (98) Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] withdrawing server sockets Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Can't initialize IPC Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [SERV ] Service engine 'corosync_cmap' failed to load for reason 'qb_ipcs_run error' Jan 30 08:20:43 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 20 at service.c:356. Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine 3.0.3 starting up Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus monitoring watchdog augeas systemd xmlconf vqsim nozzle snmp pie relro bindnow Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync warning [MAIN ] Could not increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, not locking memory: Operation not permitted (1) Jan 30 08:21:43 [7] controller1 corosync notice [TOTEM ] Initializing transport (Kronosnet). Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] kronosnet crypto initialized: aes256/sha384 Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [TOTEM ] totemknet initialized Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [KNET ] common: crypto_nss.so has been loaded from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kronosnet/crypto_nss.so Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync notice [SERV ] Service engine loaded: corosync configuration map access [0] Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] server name: cmap Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [QB ] Could not bind AF_UNIX (): Address already in use (98) Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync info [QB ] withdrawing server sockets Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Can't initialize IPC Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [SERV ] Service engine 'corosync_cmap' failed to load for reason 'qb_ipcs_run error' Jan 30 08:21:44 [7] controller1 corosync error [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 20 at service.c:356. Regards Tony Karera

1 0

Re: [all][stable][ptl] Propose to EOL Rocky series
by Thomas Goirand 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Hi, I understand the gate is broken, however, Rocky is in Debian LTS, and I would like to keep the possibility to merge patches, even with the gate tests disabled. CVE-2022-47951 is an example why this is important... Thomas Goirand (zigo) On Jan 28, 2023 11:54, Radosław Piliszek <radoslaw.piliszek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Masakari is happy to EOL Rocky too. > > Radek > -yoctozepto > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 20:59, Jay Faulkner <jay(a)gr-oss.io> wrote: > > > > Thanks for doing all this cleanup work Elod. Ironic is OK with retirements of these shared resources up to Train. > > > > - > > Jay Faulkner > > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Elõd Illés <elod.illes(a)est.tech> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose > >> to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life: > >> > >> - gates are mostly broken > >> - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch > >> - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL > >> recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) > >> - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax > >> - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public > >> maintenance window date and hard to maintain > >> > >> Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open > >> their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable > >> series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to > >> this mail. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Előd Illés > >> irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release > >> > >> [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030… > >> >

1 0

Pulling plugins from my Github repository
by vincent lee 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Hi everyone, I would like to know where exactly I can replace the path for the GitHub repository. For example, I want to pull some plugins, such as zun_ui, blazar_dashboard, etc., from my own GitHub repository instead of the default GitHub repository. I am currently using Kolla-ansible for deploying OpenStack in the yoga version. Best, Vincent

1 0

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2023 Jan 27: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Jan 25. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting logs are available @ https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2023/tc.2023-01-25-16.00.log.html * The next TC weekly meeting will be on Feb 1 Wed at 16:00 UTC, Feel free to add the topic to the agenda[1] by Jan 31. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Added Axel to Mistral project DPL list[2] * Remaining two projects (Mistral and Zaqar) which were less active (their release was in question) are green and active now. Their beta releases are also completed[3][4][5][6]. 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for the 2023.1 cycle ------------------------------------- * Current cycle working items and their progress are present in the 2023.1 tracker etherpad[7]. Open Reviews ----------------- * Two open reviews for ongoing activities[8]. Cleanup of PyPI maintainer list for OpenStack Projects ---------------------------------------------------------------- The audit process is going on and a few projects have been completed [9]. There is a discussion also going on in ML[10]. The TC discussed it in this week's meeting also and no change in the initial plan for the cleanup of additional PyPi maintainers. The process to find the less active projects early in the cycle: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I think in every cycle we get some less active projects and that is too little late in the cycle which adds extra work for the release team to release such projects. We discussed in PTG that TC should come up with some process to find such less active projects a little early in the cycle. JayF started the etherpad to collect the data and define the criteria to help in this process[11]. Project updates ------------------- * Add Cinder Huawei charm[12] * Add the woodpecker charm to Openstack charms[13] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[14]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15:00 UTC [15] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Agenda_Suggesti… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/871302 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/869470 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/869448 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/zaqar/+/857924 [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/871399 [7] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023.1-tracker [8] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [9] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-pypi-maintainers-cleanup [10] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031848… [11] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/project-health-check [12] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/867588 [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/869752 [14] hhttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [15] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[kolla] [senlin] [xena] Self-signed cert errors during Senlin auth
by Rob Jefferson 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Folks, I am deploying OpenStack Xena via Kolla. As part of improving our orchestration offerings, I am investigating the use of Senlin in our deployments. Using `enable_senlin: "yes"`, the containers install as expected. When I attempt to create an initial profile, I get the following error: > HttpException: 500: Server Error for url: https://external:8778/v1/profiles, > Could not find versioned identity endpoints when attempting to authenticate. > Please check that your auth_url is correct. SSL exception connecting > to https://internal:35357: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='internal', > port=35357): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by > SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] > certificate verify failed: self signed certificate in > certificate chain (_ssl.c:1131)'))) I have tried setting `verify_ssl = False` in senlin.conf, but no dice. I don't see this issue on the other services for which we're using the same certificates (e.g., Heat, Keystone, Barbican). Looking in the containers, I don't see <service>-cert.pem or <service>-key.pem files for Senlin as I did for other services. Moreover, the authentication configurations look the same in all relevant respects, between Senlin and the services that do work. I'm positively flummoxed about why the certs aren't getting distributed. When I take a look at the documentation for Kolla TLS [1], I saw the following: > Enabling TLS on the backend services secures communication between the > HAProxy listing on the internal/external VIP and the OpenStack > services. It also enables secure end-to-end communication between > OpenStack services that support TLS termination. The OpenStack services > that support backend TLS termination in Victoria are: Nova, Ironic, > Neutron, Keystone, Glance, Heat, Placement, Horizon, Barbican, and > Cinder. Missing from here is Senlin, and looking at the same document from subsequent OpenStack releases suggests this hasn't changed. I don't know if this is a relevant issue to the problem I've been having (to be fair, I don't see Octavia, which we've also been using, on the list, even though we also haven't been having issues with Octavia certs). Is this something that I can fix via configuration, or is this a thing wherein we need to change how Kolla deploys Senlin, or even adding in SSL termination to the Senlin service? Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Rob [1] https://github.com/openstack/kolla-ansible/blob/stable/xena/doc/source/admi…

1 0

[Openstack][cinder] multiple backend generic volume group issue
by Ignazio Cassano 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Hello All, I created a cinder configuration using multiple backends based on netapp ontap nfs with the same backend name and the same volume type. So my nfsgold1, nfsgold2 and nfsgold3 are addressed by the nfsgold volume backend name and nfsgold volume type. Each one has its own svm on netapp. This help me to distribute nfsgold volumes using scheduler filters based on free capacity. So when I create a volume with volume type nfsgold the scheduler allocates it on nfsgold1 or nfsgold2 or nfsgold3 using the capacity filter. Since some virtual machines need to have volumes on the same backend (for example nfsgold1) because they belong to the same application, I use the cinder scheduler hint. Why I need to store those volumes on the same backend? It is because they must belong to the same generic volume group for snaphotting at the same time. For this reason I need to create a generic volume group. Generic volume group creation need the volume type, in my case nfsgold. But like the volume, when I create a generic volume group, it is scheduled on nfsgold1 or nfsgold2 or nfsgold3 and it is obvious looking in the cinder database. So if I want to groups volumes of an application I must: 1 check if they are on the same backend (nfsgold1/nfsgold2/nfsgold3) 2) check on which backend the volume group is allocated (nfsgold1,/nfsgold2/nfsgold3) and it can be done only looking in the cinder database). Volumes and volume goups must stay on the same real backend. If not, when I create a group snapshot, it gives some errors because it checks the host related to the real backend (nfsgold1/nfsgold2/nfsgold3) and returns errors failing the operation. When I create a volume group by api or by command line, I must specify the volume type but I cannot know which is the real backend associated to it without looking in the cinder database. I think this is a bug. In the above situation, how can obtain consistent volume group snapshot ? Sorry for my bad english. I hope who is reading can understand what I mean. Ignazio

1 0

[openstack-ansible] Meeting on 31st of January 2023 is cancelled
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Hi everyone, Due to limited availability of core members for the upcoming meeting that should have taken place on 31.01.2023, I'm informing you that this meeting will be cancelled. Hoping to see everyone for the next meeting on 7th of February.

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-7, Jan 30 - Feb 03
by Elõd Illés 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

Development Focus ----------------- We are entering the last weeks of the 2023.1 Antelope development cycle. From now until the final release, we'll send a countdown email like this every week. It's probably a good time for teams to take stock of their library and client work that needs to be completed yet. The non-client library freeze is coming up, followed closely by the client lib freeze. Please plan accordingly to avoid any last minute rushes to get key functionality in. General Information ------------------- Next week is the Extra-ATC freeze, in preparation for elections. All contributions to OpenStack are valuable, but some are not expressed as Gerrit code changes. Please list active contributors to your project team who do not have a code contribution this cycle, and therefore won't automatically be considered an Active Technical Contributor and allowed to vote. This is done by adding extra-atcs to https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/reference/projec… before the Extra-ATC freeze on February 2nd, 2023. A quick reminder of the upcoming freeze dates. Those vary depending on deliverable type: * General libraries (except client libraries) need to have their last feature release before Non-client library freeze (February 9th, 2023). Their stable branches are cut early. * Client libraries (think python-*client libraries) need to have their last feature release before Client library freeze (February 16th, 2023) * Deliverables following a cycle-with-rc model (that would be most services) observe a Feature freeze on that same date, February 16th, 2023. Any feature addition beyond that date should be discussed on the mailing-list and get PTL approval. After feature freeze, cycle-with-rc deliverables need to produce a first release candidate (and a stable branch) before RC1 deadline (March 2nd, 2023) * Deliverables following cycle-with-intermediary model can release as necessary, but in all cases before Final RC deadline (March 16th, 2023) Finally, now is also a good time to start planning what highlights you want for your deliverables in the cycle highlights. The deadline to submit an initial version for those is set to Feature freeze (February 16th, 2023). Background on cycle-highlights: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125613.html Project Team Guide, Cycle-Highlights: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… knelson [at] openstack.org/diablo_rojo on IRC is available if you need help selecting or writing your highlights Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Extra-ATC freeze: February 2nd, 2023 (R-7 week) Non-client library freeze: February 9th, 2023 (R-6 week) Client library freeze: February 16th, 2023 (R-5 week) Antelope-3 milestone: February 16th, 2023 (R-5 week) 2023.2 Bobcat Virtual PTG: March 27-31, 2023 Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-release

1 0