- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all] [elections]'Train' PTL Nominations Kickoff
by Kendall Nelson 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hello All! Nominations for OpenStack PTLs (Program Team Leads) are now open and will remain open until Mar 12, 2019 23:45 UTC. All nominations must be submitted as a text file to the openstack/election repository as explained at http://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy Please make sure to follow the new candidacy file naming convention: candidates/<cycle>/<project_name>/<email_address>. In order to be an eligible candidate (and be allowed to vote) in a given PTL election, you need to have contributed to the corresponding team[0] during the Feb 09, 2018 00:00 UTC - Feb 19, 2019 00:00 UTC timeframe (Rocky to Stein). You must also be an OpenStack Foundation Individual Member in good standing. To check if your membership is up to date, go to https://www.openstack.org/community/members and search for your name. Additional information about the nomination process can be found here: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ Shortly after election officials approve candidates, they will be listed here: https://governance.openstack.org/election/#train-ptl-candidates The electorate is requested to confirm their email address in gerrit[1], prior to 2019-02-22 00:00:00+00:00 so that the emailed ballots are mailed to the correct email address. This email address should match that which was provided in your foundation member profile[2] as well. Happy running, -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) [0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/ [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/contact [2] https://www.openstack.org/profile/

1 0

[zaqar] Need review for a Python3 related patch
by Emilien Macchi 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Zaqar folks, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639983/ when you have time. It would help to make Zaqar websocket working with Python 3. Thanks, -- Emilien Macchi

1 0

[scientific-sig] Today's SIG meeting CANCELLED
by Stig Telfer 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hi All - Unfortunately, we have to cancel today’s meeting. Apologies for the short notice. Cheers, Stig

1 0

[TripleO] PTL non-candidacy
by Juan Antonio Osorio Robles 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hello folks! Given that the period for PTL self-nominations will start soon. It's time for me to announce that I won't be running for PTL for the next release. So, if you're interested in the position, feel free to reach out to me, I'll be happy to answer your questions about the role and tips that I've learned along the way. It's been a great learning experience and I want to thank the TripleO community for giving me this chance. Best regards

3 2

[Cyborg][IRC] The Cyborg IRC meeting will be held Wednesday at 0300 UTC
by Li Liu 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hi Team, The IRC meeting will be held Wednesday at 0300 UTC, which is 10:00 pm est(Tuesday) / 7:00 pm pst(Tuesday) /11 am Beijing time (Wednesday) We will try to do the final push before the code freeze. -- Thank you Regards Li

1 0

[barbican] PTL non-candidacy
by Ade Lee 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

With the PTL self nomination period starting this week, I wanted to say that I will not be running for PTL this cycle. The PTL experience is great, but its a position that should rotate often. With new leadership comes new energy, new ideas and new directions. I'll still be heavily involved in Barbican project regardless. Ade

1 0

[TripleO] OpenStack PTG/Forum topic brainstorming
by Juan Antonio Osorio Robles 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hey folks! So the PTG/Forum at Denver is approaching, and it's time to gather ideas for what folks wanna talk about there. Please add your ideas in the following etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-train-topics Best regards

1 0

[vitrage] Denver forum session brainstorming
by Ifat Afek 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hi, I have created an etherpad to collect our ideas for Vitrage forum sessions in Denver [1]. You are welcome to comment and add new topics. The submission deadline is March 8. Thanks, Ifat [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-train-vitrage-forum-brainstorming

1 1

[sdk] Proposing Artem Goncharov (gtema) for core
by Monty Taylor 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hey everybody, I'd like to propose making gtema core on openstacksdk. He regularly reviews all the stuff coming through, even the crazy stuff I generate, and those reviews are thorough without being nitpicky. He's definitely caught mistakes I'e made with my brainhole. He's also been doing a bunch of great dev work which shows a good understanding of the mechanics of the codebase. This includes but is not limited to the recent addition of DNS support as well as increasing our glance coverage. Not just that though - when faced with "yeah, that's great, but we need to add some deep systemic support for a new underlying concept before you can add that feature" he totally went off and did the slog of updating the guts first. All in all, he's totally active in the project and has shown a good understanding of what's going on. Thoughts? Monty

6 5

Re: [nova][dev] Any VMware resource pool and shares kind of feature available in openstack nova?
by Sanjay K 05 Mar '19

05 Mar '19

Hello Chris, Thank you for your reply. To give you more clarity on my question, let me describe my goal which I am trying to achieve through openstack nova. scenario 1- say in a compute node, I have some development and production VMs hosted. So in that compute node, production VMs will have more priority than development VMs to contend for compute resources (RAM, vcpus, disk etc). case 2. when both prod and dev VMs are on a compute node, if one user reboots one production VM which was in shutdown/not-running state, the compute node should take this VM resource allocation as priority and readjust/redistribute resources among other existing VMs so that this VM should get the adequate or more resources for which it was initially created with. If it does not find the required resources on that compute, it should migrate or launch this VM on a different compute node based on user consent or just after giving some notification to user that this VM is started on a different compute. case 3. when multiple users simultaneously starts some dev and prod VMs, the production VMs should always get the resources allocated first from the compute. Then the other low priority VMs should get their resources share. In my case, the development and production VMs belong to different subnets. If I know correctly, there is no way nova is doing resource allocation dynamically to VMs once they are hosted on a compute node. It just takes the filters and weights to decide which compute the instance should run. I think the above decision can be handled before filtering and weighing phase kicks in to decide how much resource one VM should be given to. I find the preemptible instances feature useful after going through the discussions/videos, but not sure as of now whether it will solve my cases completely. Please lee me know what you think. thank you for precious inputs. best rgds

2 1