- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[kolla] Weekly meeting today (15th May 2024) cancelled
by Michał Nasiadka 14 May '24

14 May '24

Hello Koalas, Weekly meeting today is cancelled due to key participants (including me) not being able to attend. Let’s meet next week (22nd May 2024) - see you then! Michal

1 0

OpenInfra Summit Asia'24 CFP closing in two weeks
by Jeremy Stanley 14 May '24

14 May '24

The OpenInfra Summit Asia'24 is the first community-led Summit[0], hosted by the OpenInfra Korea User Group in collaboration with other OpenInfra user groups throughout Asia. The CFP is currently open and accepting applications until May 29, 2024, so there's only two weeks left to get your proposals submitted[1]. Keep in mind that Summit talks are often professionally recorded and re-watched by a much larger global audience, having a broad impact for years after the event concludes, so your reach can be far greater than just the people who happen to be in the room at that moment. This time, the Summit will be co-located with the OCP (opencompute.org) Regional Summit APAC and will showcase the latest advancements in open source infrastructure software and hardware. If you want to present but are struggling to to come up with ideas, "beginner" content is always a crowd pleaser (setting up your first environment, tips for new contributors), but this could also be of particular interest for the growing local community in Korea. Since this event is occurring alongside one for the Open Compute Project, hardware-related topics might serve to draw in participants from their community and help grow our own through the sort of collaboration we're best known for. Upgrade stories and talks about reducing complexity are also something our users are especially keen to hear about. For that matter, talks about Networking (including 5G telephony) or integration with adjacent community tech (Ceph, Kubernetes, OVN) would be great to show how OpenStack is really an integral piece of the larger open source ecosystem. If you want to attend and your employer cannot fund your travel, the OpenInfra Foundation is continuing the OpenInfra Travel Support program. You can apply for travel support[1] until May 29. If you have any questions or want help (even if it's just to bounce ideas off me for a talk you're thinking about proposing), feel free to reply or find me (fungi) in the #openstack channel on the OFTC IRC network. [0] Register for the OpenInfra Summit Asia: https://2024.openinfraasia.org/ [1] Submit to the CFP: https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_asia_summit_2024 [2] Apply for the OpenInfra Travel Support Program: https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_tsp -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

Boot an uefi volume that migrated from VMware ESXI
by luckydog xf 14 May '24

14 May '24

Hi, list, I migrated a volume from VMware ESXI VMDK, and originally on VMware platform it's EFI boot mode and secure boot enabled. I cloned the entire VMDK by clonzilla and restored on OpenStack as a volume. I referred to this link https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/secure-boot.html and uploaded that volume as an image. Then set properties. Finally, I launched an instance with a target image, however, it cannot boot up with a blank and dark screen. What's the right way to implement this? Thanks.

2 11

[nova] Our first spec review day for Dalmatian
by Sylvain Bauza 14 May '24

14 May '24

Hey folks, As agreed during the PTG, we'll have two spec review days this cycle. Next Tuesday, ie. May 14 2024, we'll have the first one. Please make sure you can upload your spec before this and please be around on IRC on Tuesday (if you can) so we could discuss your spec change if we need. Thanks, -Sylvain

1 1

[openstack][kolla-ansible][keystone]upgrade from yoga to zed error keystone database
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 13 May '24

13 May '24

Hello. I upgraded from yoga to zed but i encounter this error as a keystone log. https://www.editpad.org/?edit-id=CNujHK962K70e93ae8 I tried to remove this table but this error still appears with other tables. My env: ubuntu22.04 openstack with kolla ansible as the deployment tool Thank you. Regards Nguyen Huu Khoi

2 4

[neutron] Bug deputy report for week of May 6th
by Miguel Lavalle 13 May '24

13 May '24

Hi, I was the Neutron bugs deputy last week. Following is a brief summary of the reported bugs: Critical bugs ----------------- None High bugs -------------- https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2065094 OVN revision number is bumped on noop port update. Assignee Jakub Libosvar. Released fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/918492 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2065459 ovn-octvia-provider: RuntimeError: cannot join current thread. In progress. Assignee Terry Wilson. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/919229 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2065460 ovn-octavia-provider results in a new OVSDB connection for every Octavia API request. In progress. Assignee Terry Wilson. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/919229 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2065566 [ovn-octavia-provider] Return DELETED on member_delete for non-existing members. In progress. Assignee Fernando Royo/ Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/919482 Medium bugs ------------------ * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2065145 AttributeError: 'MetadataDriver' object has no attribute 'monitors' in L3 agent logs, Assignee Brian Haley. Proposed fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/918674 Low bugs ------------- None Wishlist bugs ------------------ https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2065198. Allow ml2 MechanismDrivers to start own rpc listeners. Gathering more input from submitter at the moment

1 0

Nova filters
by Gk Gk 13 May '24

13 May '24

Hi, In the Antelope version nova scheduler, is there an option for filtering hypervisors based on available disk space ? I cant find the option "DiskFilter' in the latest documentation for antelope. How to achieve this ? Thanks G.K

2 4

[DNS] RFH: Something is answering DNS PTR queries with UDP and not EDNS
by Philipp Hahn 13 May '24

13 May '24

Hello, I'm new to this list and relatively new to OpenStack, so please be patient with me. Our infrastructure provider is hosting OpenStack for us and I observed the following irritating behavior: If my Linux VM does a reverse-IP-lookup (PTR) something™ seems to intercept those PTR queries on their way from the VM to the *configured* DNS server and answers them itself, returning the name of the VM inside some pre-configured domain: > # dig +nocmd +nocomments +nostats +noedns -x 10.201.0.211 > ;211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR > 211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR jenkins-ucs-5-0-ucs-5-0-7-autotestjoinopenstack-sambaversion-no.a.customers.regiocloud.tech. > > # getent hosts 10.201.0.211 > 10.201.0.211 jenkins-ucs-5-0-ucs-5-0-7-autotestjoinopenstack-sambaversion-no.a.customers.regiocloud.tech > > # python3 -c 'import DNS;req=DNS.DnsRequest("211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa.",qtype="PTR",server=["10.201.0.211"], protocol="udp");res=req.req();print(res.answers[0]["data"])' > jenkins-ucs-5-0-ucs-5-0-7-autotestjoinopenstack-sambaversion-no.a.customers.regiocloud.tech > > # python3 -c 'import dns.resolver;r=dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False);r.nameservers=["10.201.0.211"];r.edns=False;a=r.query("211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa.","PTR",tcp=False);print(list(a))' > [<DNS IN PTR rdata: jenkins-ucs-5-0-ucs-5-0-7-autotestjoinopenstack-sambaversion-no.a.customers.regiocloud.tech.>] This only happens when UDP is used an EDNS is disabled: As soon as I use TCP or force EDNS my queries arrives at the configured DNS server and I get back the expected answer: > # dig +nocmd +nocomments +nostats +edns -x 10.201.0.211 > ;211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR > 211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. 172800 IN PTR master096.autotest096.test. > 201.10.in-addr.arpa. 10800 IN NS master096.autotest096.test. > master096.autotest096.test. 80600 IN A 10.201.0.211 > > # dig +nocmd +nocomments +nostats +edns +tcp -p 53 -x 10.201.0.211 > ;211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR > 211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. 172800 IN PTR master096.autotest096.test. > 201.10.in-addr.arpa. 10800 IN NS master096.autotest096.test. > master096.autotest096.test. 80600 IN A 10.201.0.211 > > # dig +nocmd +nocomments +nostats +noedns +tcp -p 53 -x 10.201.0.211 > ;211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR > 211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa. 172800 IN PTR master096.autotest096.test. > 201.10.in-addr.arpa. 10800 IN NS master096.autotest096.test. > master096.autotest096.test. 80600 IN A 10.201.0.211 > > # python3 -c 'import DNS;req=DNS.DnsRequest("211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa.",qtype="PTR",server=["10.201.0.211"], protocol="tcp");res=req.req();print(res.answers[0]["data"])' > master096.autotest096.test > > # python3 -c 'import dns.resolver;r=dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False);r.nameservers=["10.201.0.211"];r.edns=False;a=r.query("211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa.","PTR",tcp=True);print(list(a))' > [<DNS IN PTR rdata: master096.autotest096.test.>] > > # python3 -c 'import dns.resolver;r=dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False);r.nameservers=["10.201.0.211"];r.edns=True;a=r.query("211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa.","PTR",tcp=True);print(list(a))' > [<DNS IN PTR rdata: master096.autotest096.test.>] > > # python3 -c 'import dns.resolver;r=dns.resolver.Resolver(configure=False);r.nameservers=["10.201.0.211"];r.edns=True;a=r.query("211.0.201.10.in-addr.arpa.","PTR",tcp=False);print(list(a))' > [<DNS IN PTR rdata: master096.autotest096.test.>] I already talked to out provider and spend multiple hours searching the internet or even having a look at the source code of Neutron myself, but did not find any clue so far. Can someone please enlighten me and tell me, how I (or our provider) can disable that "UDP DNS intercept behavior" as that breaks our current use-case, especially as I seldomly can configure our applications to (not) use UDP / EDNS, so depending on which resolver library they use they get different answers to the same query. Thank you in advance. Philipp Hahn -- Philipp Hahn Open Source Software Engineer Univention GmbH Mary-Somerville-Str. 1 28359 Bremen Germany | Deutschland Phone: +49 (0)421 22232-0 | E-Mail: info(a)univention.de https://www.univention.de | https://www.univention.com Managing Directors: Peter H. Ganten, Stefan Gohmann Local court: Amtsgericht Bremen HRB 20755 | Ust-ID: DE220051310 If you are not the intended recipient of this mail, please contact the sender and delete this message. Any unauthorized copying of this message or unauthorized distribution of the information contained herein is prohibited.Information on the processing of your personal data can be found here: https://www.univention.com/privacy-statement

2 1

Re: CAD applications on OpenStack
by Francesco Di Nucci 13 May '24

13 May '24

You're welcome have you also thought about having a chat with CAD vendor's team? Maybe they encountered it as a problem, as it's more about the CAD and less about having Windows VMs on OpenStack By the way, when a conversation is in a list, reply to all to include the list ;) Best regards Francesco Di Nucci On 13/05/24 12:20, Arne Wiebalck wrote: > Thanks, Francesco! > > Licenses are a concern and we're looking at that. > > What we're not really clear on if this approach works latency- / concurrency wise. > We will probably simply try :) > > Thanks again! > Arne > > -- > Dr. Arne Wiebalck > Group Leader, Compute and Devices Group > CERN IT > > ________________________________________ > From: Francesco Di Nucci <francesco.dinucci(a)na.infn.it> > Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2024 08:12 > To: Arne Wiebalck > Subject: Re: CAD applications on OpenStack > > Hi, > > former CAD user here - first of all I'd advice to clear with your legal > department if your license allows you to use the CAD in VMs. > > AFAIK CATIA runs on Windows, so containerization is not possible unless > you manage to get the CAD running in Wine, and you should configure PCI > passthrough > > (https://docs.openstack.org/nova/2024.1/admin/pci-passthrough.html) to > use a graphic card in the VMs. > > Regards > > Francesco Di Nucci > > On 05/05/24 12:04, Arne Wiebalck wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> We're looking into integrating the use case of CAD applications, such as CATIA V5/6 or CATIA 3DEXPERIENCE, into our OpenStack deployment, with the goals of increased resource sharing >> and to reduce the park of individual workstations we have for this at the moment. >> >> If anyone has experience running such applications on top of OpenStack (on individual VMs >> with GPU access, on bare metal servers with concurrent sessions, maybe even containerised ...) >> and would like to share what they have done, it'd be great if you got in touch with me. >> >> Thanks! >> Arne >> >> -- >> Arne Wiebalck >> CERN IT >> >> > >

1 0

Re: Nova filters
by Gk Gk 13 May '24

13 May '24

Hi, In the Antelope version nova scheduler, is there an option for filtering hypervisors based on available disk space ? I cant find the option "DiskFilter' in the latest documentation for antelope. How to achieve this ? Thanks G.K

1 0