- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[kayobe] Forum summary
by Mark Goddard 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi, Thanks to those who attended the kayobe forum session. I'll try to summarise the key points here. The etherpad is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BER-18-kayobe-feedback-roadmap. - Several people were keen for a Rocky release. We're working on this currently, and aim to make it a small one so that we can move to Stein. - The point was raised that the locally installed environment can be hard to keep in sync, and the installation procedure is too complex. We hope to resolve this for the rocky release via https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004252 and https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004367. - Documentation is lacking in a few areas. We aim to improve this for rocky: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004360. - Ability to import configuration of an existing deployment from kolla-ansible: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004364 - Document/automate bifrost backup procedure: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004359 A few people also requested that we start a regular IRC meeting. Up to now we've favoured ad-hoc IRC communication, but I tend to agree that the time is right. I'll send out a separate email with a poll. Cheers, Mark

1 0

[Openstack] [OpenStack][Compute-Neutron] Is it possible to create flat network from different NICs
by Soheil Pourbafrani 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi, I installed OpenStack on One node (for test) and creating a flat external network I could connect VMs to the provider network (internet). In the production environment, we have 4 NIC on each server and each server (compute node) will run 4 instances. My question is, is it possible to create a separate external network based on each NIC (so 4 external networks) and run each instance using one of them? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack(a)lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

2 2

[heat] Meeting canceled this week
by Rico Lin 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi team Since we just have summit last week, let's not over-occupied all member's time. we shall resume meeting next week -- May The Force of OpenStack Be With You, *Rico Lin*irc: ricolin

1 0

[keystone][nova] Availability zones and unified limits
by Lance Bragstad 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Unified limits cropped up in a few discussions last week. After describing the current implementation of limits, namely the attributes that make up a limit, someone asked if availability zones were on the roadmap. Ideally, it sounded like they had multiple AZs in a single region, and they wanted to be able to limit usage within the AZ. With the current implementation, regions would be the smallest unit of a deployment they could limit (e.g., limit project Foo to only using 64 compute cores within RegionOne). Instead, the idea would be to limit the number of resources for that project on an AZ within a region. What do people think about adding availability zones to limits? Should it be an official attribute in keystone? What other services would need this outside of nova? There were a few other interesting cases that popped up, but I figured we could start here. I can start another thread if needed and we can keep this specific to discussing limits + AZs. Thoughts?

4 5

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we deprecate the server backup API please?
by Matt Riedemann 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

On 11/18/2018 6:51 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > Sounds make sense to me, and then we needn't fix this strange behaviour > also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409644/ The same discussion was had in the spec for that change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511825/ Ultimately it amounted to a big "meh, let's just not fix the bug but also no one really cares about deprecating the API either". The only thing deprecating the API would do is signal that it probably shouldn't be used. We would still support it on older microversions. If all anyone cares about is signalling not to use the API then deprecation is probably fine, but I personally don't feel too strongly about it either way. -- Thanks, Matt __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

6 5

[scientific-sig] IRC Meeting today 1100 UTC - Summit wash-up, Manila+Lustre
by Stig Telfer 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi All - We have a Scientific SIG IRC meeting today at 1100 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting. Everyone is welcome. This week we’ve got the summit activities to digest, plus similar activities at SC. We’d also like to find out if there’s anyone using Manila to manage Lustre filesystems. Today’s agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_SIG#IRC_Meeting_November_21st_20… Details on how to join our meetings are here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group Cheers, Stig

1 0

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] [weekly-meeting]
by Li Liu 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

There is no weekly IRC meeting for the week of Nov 21st as most of the people are still recovering from the jetlag after the summit. I will follow up with individuals offline. -- Thank you Regards Li __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Feedback about our project at Summit
by Emilien Macchi 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

Hi folks, I wasn't at the Summit but I was interested by the feedback people gave about TripleO so I've discussed with a few people who made the trip. I would like to see what actions we can take on short and long term to address it. I collected some thoughts here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BER-tripleo-feedback Which is based on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BER-deployment-tools-feedback initially. Feel fee to add more feedback if missing, and also comment what was written. If you're aware of some WIP that address the feedback, adjust some wording if needed or just put some links if something exists and is documented already. I believe it is critical to us to listen this feedback and include some of it into our short term roadmap, so we can reduce some frustration that we can hear sometimes. Thanks for your help, -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[Openstack] how to sync quota usage our of sync in Rocky release
by Manuel Sopena Ballesteros 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

Dear Openstack community, I often have nova complaining that I have exceeded my quota, these normally happens when I node deployment fails and the resources allocated hasn't been released. Before Rocky I used to run the command below to resync, however it looks like it has been removed from Rocky. [root@TEST-openstack-controller ~]# docker exec -it -u root nova_scheduler nova-manage project quota_usage_refresh --project abc29399b91d423088549d7446766573 --user 02132c31dafa4d1d939bd52e0420b975 usage: nova-manage [-h] [--config-dir DIR] [--config-file PATH] [--debug] [--log-config-append PATH] [--log-date-format DATE_FORMAT] [--log-dir LOG_DIR] [--log-file PATH] [--nodebug] [--nopost-mortem] [--nouse-journal] [--nouse-json] [--nouse-syslog] [--nowatch-log-file] [--post-mortem] [--syslog-log-facility SYSLOG_LOG_FACILITY] [--use-journal] [--use-json] [--use-syslog] [--version] [--watch-log-file] [--remote_debug-host REMOTE_DEBUG_HOST] [--remote_debug-port REMOTE_DEBUG_PORT] {version,bash-completion,placement,network,cell_v2,db,cell,floating,api_db} ... nova-manage: error: argument category: invalid choice: 'project' (choose from 'version', 'bash-completion', 'placement', 'network', 'cell_v2', 'db', 'cell', 'floating', 'api_db') Any idea how can I refresh the quota usage in Rocky? Thank you very much Manuel Sopena Ballesteros | Big data Engineer Garvan Institute of Medical Research The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, 370 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010 T: + 61 (0)2 9355 5760 | F: +61 (0)2 9295 8507 | E: manuel.sb(a)garvan.org.au<mailto:manuel.sb@garvan.org.au> NOTICE Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message and any attachments are intended for the addressee named and may contain legally privileged/confidential/copyright information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read, use, disclose, copy or distribute this communication. If you have received this message in error please notify us at once by return email and then delete both messages. We accept no liability for the distribution of viruses or similar in electronic communications. This notice should not be removed. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack(a)lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

2 1

[openstack-dev] [nova] about filter the flavor
by Rambo 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

Hi,all I have an idea.Now we can't filter the special flavor according to the property.Can we achieve it?If we achieved this,we can filter the flavor according the property's key and value to filter the flavor. What do you think of the idea?Can you tell me more about this ?Thank you very much. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

2 1