- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

openstack/devstack issue
by syed 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Hi, I was building a system i.e. an orchestrator that includes resources like an ubuntu virtual machine, firecracker micro virtual machine, unikraft unikernel and a storage. It seems that openstack/devstack is capable of orchestration of such a heterogeneous system and could be customized according to the specific needs. I, however, am experiencing a lot of issues when including the resources e.g. when i try to create an ubuntu image and launch it, it results in errors that are quite complex to resolve and so i intend to reach out to the experts so as to resolve these issues at hand. Regards

2 1

[ironic][stable] Proposing EOL of ironic project branches older than Wallaby
by Jay Faulkner 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Hi all, Ironic has a large amount of stable branches still in EM. We need to take action to ensure those branches are either retired or have CI repaired to the point of being usable. Specifically, I'm looking at these branches across all Ironic projects: - stable/queens - stable/rocky - stable/stein - stable/train - stable/ussuri - stable/victoria In lieu of any volunteers to maintain the CI, my recommendation for all the branches listed above is that they be marked EOL. If someone wants to volunteer to maintain CI for those branches, they can propose one of the below paths be taken instead: 1 - Someone volunteers to maintain these branches, and also report the status of CI of these older branches periodically on the Ironic whiteboard and in Ironic meetings. If you feel strongly that one of these branches needs to continue to be in service; volunteering in this way is how to save them. 2 - We seriously reduce CI. Basically removing all tempest tests to ensure that CI remains reliable and able to merge emergency or security fixes when needed. In some cases; this still requires CI fixes as some older inspector branches are failing *installing packages* in unit tests. I would still like, in this case, that someone volunteers to ensure the minimalist CI remains happy. My intention is to let this message serve as notice and a waiting period; and if I've not heard any response here or in Monday's Ironic meeting (in 6 days), I will begin taking action on retiring these branches. This is simply a start; other branches (including bugfix branches) are also in bad shape in CI, but getting these retired will significantly reduce the surface area of projects and branches to evaluate. I know it's painful to drop support for these branches; but we've provided good EM support for these branches for a long time and by pruning them away, we'll be able to save time to dedicate to other items. Thanks, Jay Faulkner

3 5

Add netapp storage in edge site | Wallaby | DCN
by Swogat Pradhan 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Hi, I have a DCN setup and there is a requirement to use a netapp storage device in one of the edge sites. Can someone please confirm if it is possible? And if so then should i add the parameters in the edge deployment script or the central deployment script. Any suggestions? With regards, Swogat Pradhan

2 10

[blazar] Meeting cancelled today
by Pierre Riteau 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Hello, I am unable to run the IRC meeting today, let's cancel. Best wishes, Pierre Riteau (priteau)

1 0

problem with zun not available console in horizon
by МАКАРОВ МАКС 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

1 0

CRITICAL! RabbitMQ PackageCloud repos will be not more available from today - affected Openstack-ansible
by Maroš Varchola 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

From today, the PackageCloud repos will be not more available from today. Official information: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/discussions/8386 BUG on launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/2021410 -- S pozdravom/Yours Sincerely, Maroš Varchola +421 950 401 060 Astrová 6116/2, 071 01 Michalovce, Slovakia marosvarchola(a)sunray.sk ---- Táto správa bola digitálne podpísaná PGP certifikátom/ This message was digitally signed by PGP certificate

5 7

[neutron] New Yoga, Zed and 2023.1 releases
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Hello Neutrinos: Please check the new releases proposals for Yoga, Zed and 2023.1: * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885030 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885031 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885033 If you find something wrong please comment on the patch. Regards.

1 0

[horizon][stable] [release] Proposal to make stable/stein as EOL
by vishal manchanda 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Hi all, As discussed in yesterday's Horizon weekly meeting[1] on 2023-05-31, I want to announce that the Horizon team decided to move the stable/stein branch as EOL. Consider this mail as an official announcement of that. The gate for horizon stable/stein is failing for the last few months [2]. I would like to know if anyone still wants to keep this branch to be open otherwise, I will propose an EOL patch for this branch. Thanks & Regards, Vishal Manchanda [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-horizon/%23openstack-hori… [2] https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fhorizon+branch:stable%25…

1 0

Question About BGP Dynamic Routing, Floating IP, and SNAT
by Alex 31 May '23

31 May '23

Hi Everyone, Hope you are all doing well. I'm a beginner to Openstack and Neutron and now run into an issue about SNAT and shared floating IP. I've already deployed a neutron network which use BGP to announce floating IP to PE (Provider Edge router), and everything works as expected when I assigned the public floating IP (e.g., 123.0.0.10/24) to VMs. But when I tried to use floating IP port-forwarding function with floating IP 123.0.0.20/24 and rule (internal_ip 10.10.10.10, internal_port 5555, external_port 64000), and assign a private IP (10.10.10.10/24) to a VM. The floating IP 123.0.0.20 won't be advertised through BGP. May I have some suggestions about how could I get this fixed, or the neutron just won't work this way? FYI, 1. Per my understanding, the port_forwardings rule will make the port acts like a SNAT role and forward any packets that reached to it with destination 123.0.0.20:64000 to the private IP 10.10.10.10/24. 2. The IP address could be reached in the neutron network. 3. PE IP address, CE IP address, and floating IP gateway are using the same subnet A and subnet pool (192.168.123.0/24), while floating IP belongs to subnet B and subnet pool (123.0.0.0/24), both subnets belong to provider network. 4. Only floating IP that assigned to the specific VM will be advertised to PE through BGP 5. Floating IP that assigned to port of a router in the neutron network won't be advertised, even the IP is activated and is reachable internally. Sincerely, Alex

1 0

[ironic] retirement of old bugfix branches
by Riccardo Pittau 31 May '23

31 May '23

Hello everyone! We're going to remove old bugfix branches in the next few weeks, all bugfix branches that are older than 6 months are officially EoL. This includes: - for ironic bugfix/18.0 bugfix/18.1 bugfix/19.0 bugfix/20.2 bugfix/21.0 bugfix/21.2 - for ironic-inspector bugfix/10.7 bugfix/10.9 bugfix/10.12 bugfix/11.0 bugfix/11.2 -for ironic-python-agent bugfix/8.0 bugfix/8.1 bugfix/8.3 bugfix/8.6 bugfix/9.0 bugfix/9.2 Thanks! Ciao Riccardo

1 0