- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[all][qa] The hacky way to do early python 3.14 tempest testing
by Sean Mooney 22 Apr '26

22 Apr '26

Hi all o/ So I have been experimenting with optionally supporting uv in DevStack to provide a portable (cross-distro) way to provide Python interpreters without building them from source and an alternative to pip (using uv pip) to create and install dependencies in the testing venv. I am not entirely happy with how the series is currently proposed, as I got AI to take the working commit and break it down into smaller commits, so I will probably change that in the future, but the important thing is it works end to end. One of the decisions I made in the series was to support having uv provide the interpreter and disabling --site-packages when creating the venvs. That means the DevStack venvs are isolated from the host Python. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/985735 is a DNM that turns on this functionality and pins Python to 3.14. Several jobs have passed: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildset/da24501f7c384e448209691fa86eb… Many failed on a semi-known pickle issue that breaks Nova's noVNC proxy, but several of the passing jobs are non-trivial. You can see that tempest-multinode-full-py3 passed: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/e3442f47e9914be1b7508f8193fc841e While that is not the same as all Tempest tests passing, it is a pretty wide cross-section of OpenStack. For example, not only those that boot and migrate VMs, but it attaches and detaches volumes and instances, including booting from multi-attach Cinder volumes and then resizing. swift-dsvm-functional also passed under Python 3.14. If you are interested in getting a smoke test for your projects just to get a baseline of what is and is not functional, I would suggest creating a DNM patch like this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985802 Hopefully we will be able to do more standard testing with Python 3.14 once Ubuntu 26.04 is available, but I just wanted to share this in the interim. regards sean

1 0

[neutron] neutron-l2gw needs a Gazapcho release
by Thomas Goirand 22 Apr '26

22 Apr '26

Hi, Building neutron-l2gw 21.0.0 with the rest of gazpacho leads to unit tests turning in loop for hours. I packaged 21.0.0+git.2026.04.09.c548b75828 (ie: tip of master), and it works a way better. So I'm hereby requesting that a Gazpacho release is tagged. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

3 3

[oslo] Proposal to add Ghanshyam Maan as core team
by Daniel Mats Niklas Bengtsson 22 Apr '26

22 Apr '26

Hi everyone, I hope you are all doing well. I would like to propose adding Ghanshyam Maan to the oslo core team. Ghanshyam has been actively contributing to the Oslo libraries for some time. He regularly participates in technical discussions, including work around multiprocessing, provides thoughtful and constructive code reviews, and has contributed several solid patches. He is also currently serving as the TACT-SIG liaison and has offered to take on the role of release liaison as well. His consistent involvement in reviews and project discussions demonstrates a strong commitment to the Oslo projects and to the OpenStack community. I believe he would be a great addition to the oslo core team. Please reply with your votes (+1 / 0 / -1). The vote will remain open for one week.

5 4

[kolla] kolla-core and kolla-reviewers proposed changes
by Michał Nasiadka 22 Apr '26

22 Apr '26

Hello, Kolla cores had a discussion about the current state of the core team, and we propose following changes. 1. Move an existing and long time Kolla-core to emeritus status: * Christian Berendt (cberendt) Christian has been a core reviewer for a long time, but sadly now he’s not that active anymore (no activity for the past year) - so we propose to move him to Emeritus status. This just means that while he may be removed from the team, if at some future point he returns to the Kolla community we may expedite his return to the core group. 2. Move an existing, but with minimum activity kolla-core to kolla-reviewers group: * Michal Arbet (kevko) While we value his contributions and technical insight on the reviews - we want to ensure that the final merge step is handled by those with real-time visibility into the latest commits and dependencies. 3. Last, but not least - promote the inaugural member of kolla-reviewers group to kolla-core. He has used his +2 judiciously, has been very active and tracking development priorities and have earned the trust of the community to use that same judgement about which changes to approve: * Bertrand Lanson (blanson) Thanks everyone for your contributions to Kolla, current and future. I’ll wait a week for responses to that proposal and implement given no critical feedback. Michal

1 0

[swift][ptg] Ops Feedback Session - 22nd April at 1300 UTC
by Matthew Oliver 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

As we've done in PTGs past, we're getting devs and ops together to talk about Swift: what's working, what isn't, and what would be most helpful to improve. We're meeting in the hibiscus swift meetpad room ( https://meetpad.opendev.org/p/apr2026-ptg-swift) on Wednesday at 13:00UTC -- if you run a Swift cluster, we hope to see you there! Even if you can't make it, we'd appreciate it if you can offer some feedback on the etherpad ( https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/swift-hibiscus-ops-feedback) This has always been a highlight at every PTG for us swift devs. Have your say and help make Swift even better! Matt

1 0

Upcoming metrics dashboard changes
by Ildiko Vancsa 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

Hi OpenStack community, Since the OpenInfra Foundation joined the Linux Foundation, we have been looking into opportunities to take advantage of the frameworks and tool sets that the Linux Foundation has, and some of you and your organizations are already familiar with. While the dashboards are still being built I would like to let you know that, as part of that effort, we will switch to LFX Insights[1] as the metrics dashboard for OpenInfra projects, including OpenStack, starting on __January 15, 2026.__ A couple things to note: - The new OpenStack metrics dashboard[2] is already available, but it is __still under active construction.__ - The set of metrics that is displayed on the new dashboard will not be identical with the metrics on the dashboard provided by Bitergia. - LFX Insights does not display affiliation information for individuals who are listed on the dashboard as contributors, for privacy reasons. However, if you already have an LF account[3], you will be able to check and update your affiliation information. Or, you can create a new LF account[4]. - You can learn more about the dashboard in the LFX Insights documentation[5]. - If your organization is an OpenInfra Foundation / Linux Foundation member already, the LF Organization Dashboard[6] is also available for a more company-centric view. The OpenStack Bitergia metrics dashboard[7] remains available __until January 14, 2026.__ Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Ildikö [1] https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/ [2] https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/OpenStack/ [3] https://openprofile.dev/ [4] https://docs.linuxfoundation.org/lfx/sso/create-an-account [5] https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/docs/introduction/what-is-insights/ [6] https://lfx.linuxfoundation.org/tools/organization-dashboard/ [7] https://openstack.biterg.io/ ——— Ildikó Váncsa Director of Community OpenInfra Foundation

4 14

[zun] Service is broken for 2026.1 with constrained oslo_db
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

Hey there, I wanted to let the community know, that Zun service has been released in a broken state for the 2026.1 and is not passing CI tests with constrained version of oslo.db [1], due to reliance on the legacy engine facade, which has been removed from the oslo.db for 2026.1 With that, patch fixing Zun for 2026.1 was published around a month ago, with no reviews from the Zun Core Reviewers group. It would be really appreciated if somebody from the Zun team could have a look at the state of the gates, and merge/backport required patches to ensure working state of the service. Thanks in advance. [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/commit/7e07cb254ee7786723be7… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/zun/+/982362

1 0

[ops][publiccloud-sig] Public Cloud SIG meeting d.d. 22 April
by Kees Meijs | Nefos 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

Hello Stackers, Tomorrow (that's 22 April) the bi-weekly Public Cloud SIG meeting will be held again. The publicly available video meeting will be conducted from 07:05 hrs UTC (09:05 hrs CEST) until 08:55 hrs UTC (09:55 hrs CEST) here: https://meetpad.opendev.org/publiccloud-sig Additional information to be found on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudSIG Cheers, Kees __ Kees Meijs BICT Nefos Cloud & IT <https://nefos.com/contact> Nefos IT bv Burgemeester Mollaan 34a 5582 CK Waalre - NL kvk 66494931 +31 (0)88 2088 188 <tel:+31882088188> nefos.com <https://nefos.com/contact> The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain classified information. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual(s) and not necessarily of the organization. No reliance may be placed on this message without written confirmation from an authorised representative of its contents. No guarantee is implied that this message or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended. General terms and conditions ("The NLdigital Terms") apply to all our products and services.

1 0

State of Unified Limits
by Tyler Wilson 21 Apr '26

21 Apr '26

Hello All, I'm looking into possibly utilizing unified limits and have a couple questions. 1. How is the support for unified limits in the major projects? I seem to only see official documented support in Nova at the moment. 2. Is 'strict_two_level' supported currently? This leads me to believe it was never fully finished: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.limit/+/695527 Thanks for any help you can provide.

3 2

Re: [tacker] 2026.2 vPTG planning
by Yasufumi Ogawa 20 Apr '26

20 Apr '26

Hi Goutham, Thank you for your notice! I'd like to add the issue to our discussion items. Yasufumi On 2026/04/18 16:17, Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote: > Hi, > > Unsure if my prior email didn't go through. Could you please take a look > at https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/2147354 <https:// > bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/2147354> > > Thanks, > Goutham > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 2:52 PM Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o(a)gmail.com > <mailto:yasufum.o@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi tacker team, > > The next vPTG will take place from Apr 20th to 24th. As I shared on the > previous IRC meeting, I booked two days for sessions and another for a > spare time slot[1]. Please add your items our etherpad for 2026.1 > before > starting the sessions[2]. > > - Tue. 21th Apr 7:00-9:00 UTC > - Wed. 22th Apr 7:00-9:00 UTC > - (spare) Thu. 23th Apr 7:00-9:00 UTC > > [1] https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html <https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html> > [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/apr2026-ptg-tacker <https:// > etherpad.opendev.org/p/apr2026-ptg-tacker> > > Thanks, > Yasufumi >

2 2