- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[ci][kolla] setuptools v82.0.0 breaks a bunch of things by removing pkg_resources
by Michael Still 09 Feb '26

09 Feb '26

Hey all, I've just noticed that setuptools v82.0.0 released todayish and breaks a bunch of Kolla builds (and probably other things) by removing pkg_resources. https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/stable/history.html#v82-0-0 has further details of the release. setuptools doesn't seem to be listed in upper-constraints, perhaps because it's often provided as a distro package? Michael

9 13

[ci][nova][cinder][glance][devstack][swift] openstacksdk-functional-devstack job failing 100%
by melanie witt 09 Feb '26

09 Feb '26

Hey all, We noticed sometime today the openstacksdk-functional-devstack job appears to be failing 100% in multiple projects: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstacksdk-functiona… The failing openstacksdk test is test_add_remove_router_interface [1]: ft1.1: openstack.tests.functional.cloud.test_router.TestRouter.test_add_remove_router_interfacetesttools.testresult.real._StringException: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/openstack/tests/functional/cloud/test_router.py", line 232, in test_add_remove_router_interface self.assertIn(key, iface) File "/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/.tox/functional/lib/python3.12/site-packages/testtools/testcase.py", line 425, in assertIn self.assertThat(haystack, Contains(needle), message) File "/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/.tox/functional/lib/python3.12/site-packages/testtools/testcase.py", line 509, in assertThat raise mismatch_error testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: 'tenant_id' not in {'id': '57671080-6eb2-4c7f-9e64-c61edfa8995e', 'project_id': '1ef2e6c3fc2d4f6b92fdd8d49f0a05a1', 'port_id': '5b39bbfc-6d3d-440e-9c7a-e56e434ef897', 'network_id': '8aa6b6e2-e0c5-4f96-bb87-5509e30d340c', 'subnet_id': '6f52d8be-cf68-4552-b57d-37142cea65cc', 'subnet_ids': ['6f52d8be-cf68-4552-b57d-37142cea65cc']} which adds an interface to a router and expects the response parameter 'tenant_id' to be in the response. I looked for recently merged changes that could have possibly changed the router API response and it might be something similar to this change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/972982 but I don't really understand if/how that could change the API. I'm not sure what the desired fix will be here, whether the API should be more backward compatible and/or if the openstacksdk test should be fixed by s/tenant_id/project_id/ or something else. Please hold your rechecks if CI has failed on your patch due to this. -melwitt [1] https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/7afe210333ec236a14fc5fa2d4a5…

2 3

[Nova] Live migration failed / VM has latency with patch to add managed='no' flag to libvirt XML
by Chang Xue 09 Feb '26

09 Feb '26

Hi, We are upgrading from Jammy to Noble, and need to include the patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967570?tab=comments so VMs could be created on Noble nodes. However, all of our existing VMs that were created without the patch could not be live migrated to Noble, and has latency in live migrating to Jammy WITH the patch. To be clear: Old VMs created on Jammy -> patch applied on Jammy and Noble -> VMs can be live migrated to Jammy now, but with latency (VMs are pingable almost 10 seconds after live migration completed); VMs can not be live migrated directly to Noble nodes. After live migrated to Jammy with latency, we could live migrate the VMs between Jammy nodes, and one-way to Noble nodes, without any latency. Would like to understand it more, is there any way to get rid of the latency issue? I tried to patch nova/virt/libvirt/migration.py to add managed='no' flag when migration is on fly, but it only allows me to live migrate the old VMs directly to Noble nodes, latency still exists. Thanks, Chang

4 11

[cinder][nova][os-brick] Guidance on cross-project driver contribution
by Alokedip Choudhuri 08 Feb '26

08 Feb '26

Hello Everyone, We are working on contributing a new Cinder driver for *Infoscale*. This implementation requires coordinated changes across three projects to support the full attachment lifecycle: 1. *Cinder:* The core driver implementation. 2. *os-brick:* The connector APIs have been implemented there 3. *Nova:* New driver implementation to support the required operations like, "attach, detach, extend" for the volumes provisioned through the InfoScale Backend. We have already registered blueprints for this work: - *Cinder Blueprint:* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/infoscale-cinder-driver - *Nova Blueprint:* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/infoscale-nova-driver Since this is a cross-project effort, I would appreciate guidance on the preferred workflow for submitting patches across multiple repositories to ensure a smooth integration. Looking forward to your feedback and suggestions. Thanks & Regards Alokedip

3 2

[keystone] Questions about federation mapping rules for academic research
by Sait, Abubakur Abdulgader S 07 Feb '26

07 Feb '26

Hello Keystone community, I am a PhD student researching privacy in federated identity systems. My work focuses on OpenStack Keystone federation, specifically how mapping rules process attributes from external Identity Providers. I would appreciate any insights from operators or developers about real-world federation deployments. My questions are: About mapping rules: 1. How many mapping rules do you typically have per federated IdP? 2. How often do these rules change after initial deployment? 3. Do you commonly use regex conditions, or mostly exact match conditions like any_one_of and not_any_of? About attributes: 4. How many attributes do you typically receive from federated IdPs? 5. For multi-valued attributes, how many values does a typical user have? About privacy: 6. Do you have privacy requirements affecting federated attributes? Any response would help my research. I am happy to share findings with the community when completed. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Abubakur Sait PhD Student, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA

1 0

[all][election] Check your voting eligibility for the OpenStack PTL & TC elections
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

Hello Stackers, Election season is here, and we want to ensure every voice that helps build OpenStack is heard. I would like you to take a moment to verify your "Active Contributor" [1] and OpenInfra Foundation membership status so you don't miss your chance to vote. To receive a ballot for the OpenStack TC elections, you must be a contributor to OpenStack repositories _and_ hold the status of "OIF Individual Member." To receive a ballot for a PTL election, you must have contributed to any of a project team's repositories _and_ hold the status of "OIF Individual Member." Check your membership level: ======================== Log in to your profile at https://openinfra.org/a/profile. Even if you’ve been a member for years, the OpenInfra Foundation (OIF) has a policy that automatically downgrades memberships to "OIF Community Member" if you haven't voted in recent Governing Board elections [2]. Upon logging in, if you see that you are an "OIF Community Member," you can restore your "OIF Individual Member" status on that profile page. Get recognized as an "Active Contributor": ================================ While our policy traditionally focuses on contributors to OpenStack's git repositories, we know that impactful work happens far beyond just code and documentation. We definitely value the "intangible" work that keeps this community running. If you haven’t contributed code or documentation to a repository during the 2025.2–2026.1 timeframe (March 14, 2025 – February 18, 2026), you can still vote! Please reach out to the PTL or DPL liaison of the project team you’ve supported and request to be added as an "Extra AC" (Extra Active Contributor) today [3]. The deadline to do this is February 13, 2026. If you run into issues or have questions about your eligibility, the TC would be happy to help. Simply reply to this thread, or chime in on OFTC's #openstack-tc IRC channel. Thanks, Goutham Pacha Ravi (gouthamr) [1] "Active Contributor": https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#voters-for-tc-se… [2] OIF membership page: https://openinfra.org/join/individual/ [3] Extra AC deadline: https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html#g-extra-acs

5 6

[release] Release countdown for week R-7
by Thierry Carrez 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

Development Focus ----------------- We are entering the last weeks of the 2026.1 " Gazpacho" development cycle. From now until the final release, we'll send a countdown email like this every week. It's probably a good time for teams to take stock of their library and client work that needs to be completed yet. The non-client library freeze is coming up, followed closely by the client lib freeze. Please plan accordingly to avoid any last minute rushes to get key functionality in. General Information ------------------- Next week is the Extra-AC freeze, in preparation for elections. All contributions to OpenStack are valuable, but some are not expressed as Gerrit code changes. Please list active contributors to your project team who do not have a code contribution this cycle, and therefore won't automatically be considered an Active Contributor and allowed to vote. This is done by adding extra-acs to https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/reference/projec… before the Extra-AC freeze on February 12th. A quick reminder of the upcoming freeze dates. Those vary depending on deliverable type: * Oslo libraries are entering feature freeze next week, February 12th. * General libraries (except client libraries) need to have their last feature release before Non-client library freeze (February 19th). Their stable branches are cut early. * Client libraries (think python-*client libraries) need to have their last feature release before Client library freeze (February 26th) * Deliverables following a cycle-with-rc model (that would be most services) observe a Feature freeze on that same date, February 26th. Any feature addition beyond that date should be discussed on the mailing list and get PTL approval. After feature freeze, cycle-with-rc deliverables need to produce a first release candidate (and a stable branch) before RC1 deadline (March 12th) * Deliverables following cycle-with-intermediary model can release as necessary, but in all cases before Final RC deadline (March 26th) Finally, now is also a good time to start planning what highlights you want for your deliverables in the cycle highlights. The deadline to submit an initial version for those is set to one week after Feature freeze (March 5th). Background on cycle-highlights: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125613.html Project Team Guide, Cycle-Highlights: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… jeremy [at] openstack.org/fungi on IRC is available if you need help selecting or writing your highlights. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Extra-AC freeze: February 12th, 2026 (R-7 week) Oslo feature freeze: February 12th, 2026 (R-7 week) Non-client library freeze: February 19th, 2026 (R-6 week) Client library freeze: February 26th, 2026 (R-5 week) Gazpacho-3 milestone: February 26th, 2026 (R-5 week) Cycle highlights deadline: March 5th, 2026 (R-4 week) Hibiscus (virtual) PTG: April 20-24, 2026 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

1 0

February 4 Meeting Recap & Next Steps
by Kendall Nelson 05 Feb '26

05 Feb '26

Hello folks! Thank you for all your participation thus far - watching the previous recording, answering the last poll, attending the meetings, etc. Here is the recording from today's meeting for those that were unable to attend it live: https://zoom.us/rec/share/9vo8njF87mFdFQhsYdZzYBrY3DSfeuo5t2EJIxMdV4CCtslQs… If you do watch, I would encourage you to add your name and details to the etherpad where we took notes on today's meeting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Digital-Sovereignty-WG The next meeting date and time is to be determined by you all! Here is the poll to vote <https://beta.framadate.org/polls/fe703653fdd969cbdaf4/1e0eba4bc789b7067aa1/…> on a date/time between Feb 17th, 18th, and 19th. *I will set the deadline to vote for the end of the previous week - February 13. * Lastly, I want to remind folks of the homework we discussed on the call - using some of the words and phrases we brainstormed (and any others that get added) to craft a stance on why OpenInfra and our projects are able to support digital sovereignty. For more information on this discussion, please watch the recording of the recent meeting. Thanks! -Kendall

1 2

[neutron] Drivers meeting canceled Friday, February 6th
by Brian Haley 05 Feb '26

05 Feb '26

Hello Neutrinos: I am going to cancel tomorrow's Drivers meeting as there are no topics and I will be out. Just a reminder that our open spec list is at [0]. Have a nice weekend! -Brian [0] https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-specs

1 0

[kolla][cinder] strange behavior with 2 storage nodes
by Alexander Luedtke 05 Feb '26

05 Feb '26

Hello Everyone, I have an strange behavior here on an cinder installation deployed with Kolla: The Setup: - 1 Controller node - some compute nodes - 2 Storage nodes (storage0, storage2) - later it should be 3. both with NFS Setup what is working. both storage nodes are shown on Skyline. The Problem: 1. in Skyline both storage nodes are shown but both are shown with the same size of one of both. 2. When I created a Volume then it was created on the other host as shown (in DB, skyline and so on) Anyone an idea what I can do to correct this problems ? Thanks a lot for your help ! Alexander -- Alexander Luedtke Systemadministrator Technische Universität München TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology Chair of IT Security Garching Boltzmannstr. 3 Room 01.08.036 85748 Garching b. Muenchen Tel. +49 89 289 18039 www.sec.in.tum.de

1 1