January 2024 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[ironic][glance] tradeoffs between ceph and swift glance backends for ironic+kvm?
by Michael Sherman 06 Jan '24

06 Jan '24

Hey! We’re looking into deploying a cloud with a mix of VM and baremetal hosts (nova-compute vs ironic), and discovered some tension between the recommendations for glance for each case. At scale, ironic seems to recommend usage of the swift backend to remove the conductor as a bottleneck when streaming disk images, but for KVM usage, the RBD backend allows for faster launches by cloning the source image. Any thoughts on these or any other tradeoffs, or some recommended configurations? Thanks! -Mike -- Michael Sherman Infrastructure Lead – Chameleon Computer Science, University of Chicago MCS, Argonne National Lab

3 2

reset-state instances with Api in openstack
by Parsa Aminian 06 Jan '24

06 Jan '24

hello Is there any Api for reset-state instance status to active or error on openstack api ?

5 5

[release] Release countdown for week R-12
by Thierry Carrez 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Development Focus ----------------- The Caracal-2 milestone is next week, on January 11th, 2024! 2024.1 Caracal-related specs should now be finalized so that teams can move to implementation ASAP. Some teams observe specific deadlines on the second milestone (mostly spec freezes): please refer to https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html for details. General Information ------------------- Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next week, the release team will propose releases for any library that has not been otherwise released since milestone 1. PTL's and release liaisons, please watch for these and give a +1 to acknowledge them. If there is some reason to hold off on a release, let us know that as well. A +1 would be appreciated, but if we do not hear anything at all by the end of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed. Remember that non-library deliverables that follow the cycle-with-intermediary release model should have an intermediary release before milestone-2. Those who haven't will be proposed to switch to the cycle-with-rc model, which is more suited to deliverables that are released only once per cycle. Next week is also the deadline to freeze the contents of the final release. All new 2024.1 Caracal deliverables need to have a deliverable file in https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables and need to have done a release by milestone-2. Changes proposing those deliverables for inclusion in 2024.1 Caracal have been posted, please update them with an actual release request before the milestone-2 deadline if you plan on including that deliverable in 2024.1 Caracal, or -1 if you need one more cycle to be ready. Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- Caracal-2 Milestone: January 11th, 2024 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

1 0

[neutron] Neutron drivers meeting
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Hello Neutrinos: Due to the lack of quorum, I've cancelled the meeting 5 minutes after starting it. We'll retake the pending issues next week. Regards.

1 0

tox -e pep8 error
by Alex Song (宋文平) 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Folks, my env run 'tox -e pep8' error with the info below, any body can help? Thanks. /opt/stack/nova/.tox/pep8/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py :80: _DeprecatedInstaller: setuptools.installer and fetch_build_eggs are deprecated. !! **************************************************************************** **** Requirements should be satisfied by a PEP 517 installer. If you are using pip, you can try `pip install --use-pep517`. **************************************************************************** **** !! dist.fetch_build_eggs(dist.setup_requires) /opt/stack/nova/.tox/pep8/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/command/dev elop.py:39: EasyInstallDeprecationWarning: easy_install command is deprecated. !! **************************************************************************** **** Please avoid running ``setup.py`` and ``easy_install``. Instead, use pypa/build, pypa/installer or other standards-based tools. See https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/917 for details. **************************************************************************** **** !! easy_install.initialize_options(self) /opt/stack/nova/.tox/pep8/lib/python3.8/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/ cmd.py:66: SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: setup.py install is deprecated. !! **************************************************************************** **** Please avoid running ``setup.py`` directly. Instead, use pypa/build, pypa/installer or other standards-based tools. See https://blog.ganssle.io/articles/2021/10/setup-py-deprecated.html for details. **************************************************************************** **** !! self.initialize_options() pep8 develop-inst-nodeps: /opt/stack/nova pep8 installed: alembic==1.9.4,amqp==5.1.1,async-timeout==4.0.3,attrs==23.1. 0,autopage==0.5.1,backports.zoneinfo==0.2.1,bcrypt==4.0.1,cachetools==5.3.1, castellan==4.3.0,certifi==2023.11.17,cffi==1.15.1,cfgv==3.4.0,charset-normal izer==3.2.0,cliff==4.4.0,cmd2==2.4.3,cryptography==41.0.4,cursive==0.2.3,deb tcollector==2.5.0,decorator==5.1.1,Deprecated==1.2.14,distlib==0.3.7,dnspyth on==2.4.2,dogpile.cache==1.2.2,eventlet==0.33.3,fasteners==0.19,filelock==3. 12.4,fixtures==4.1.0,futurist==2.4.1,greenlet==2.0.2,identify==2.5.33,idna== 3.4,importlib-metadata==6.0.1,importlib-resources==6.1.1,iso8601==2.0.0,Jinj a2==3.1.2,jmespath==1.0.1,jsonpatch==1.33,jsonpointer==2.4,jsonschema==4.19. 1,jsonschema-specifications==2023.7.1,jwcrypto==1.5.1,keystoneauth1==5.4.0,k eystonemiddleware==10.5.0,kombu==5.3.2,lxml==4.9.3,Mako==1.2.4,MarkupSafe==2 .1.3,microversion-parse==1.0.1,msgpack==1.0.6,netaddr==0.9.0,netifaces==0.11 .0,nodeenv==1.8.0,-e git+ssh://songwenping@review.opendev.org:29418/openstack/nova@39f560d6730f2b 212506b7d754645c288d13f1cd#egg=nova,numpy==1.24.2,openstacksdk==2.0.0,os-bri ck==6.5.0,os-client-config==2.1.0,os-resource-classes==1.1.0,os-service-type s==1.7.0,os-traits==3.0.0,os-vif==3.3.0,os-win==5.9.0,osc-lib==2.8.1,oslo.ca che==3.5.0,oslo.concurrency==5.2.0,oslo.config==9.2.0,oslo.context==5.3.0,os lo.db==14.1.0,oslo.i18n==6.2.0,oslo.limit==2.2.0,oslo.log==5.4.0,oslo.messag ing==14.5.0,oslo.metrics==0.7.0,oslo.middleware==5.2.0,oslo.policy==4.2.1,os lo.privsep==3.2.0,oslo.reports==3.1.0,oslo.rootwrap==7.1.0,oslo.serializatio n==5.2.0,oslo.service==3.2.0,oslo.upgradecheck==2.2.0,oslo.utils==6.3.0,oslo .versionedobjects==3.2.0,ovs==3.1.2,ovsdbapp==2.5.0,packaging==23.1,paramiko ==3.3.1,Paste==3.5.3,PasteDeploy==3.0.1,pbr==6.0.0,pkgutil_resolve_name==1.3 .10,platformdirs==3.10.0,pre-commit==3.5.0,prettytable==3.9.0,prometheus-cli ent==0.17.1,psutil==5.9.5,pycadf==3.1.1,pycparser==2.21,pyinotify==0.9.6,PyJ WT==2.8.0,PyNaCl==1.5.0,pyOpenSSL==23.2.0,pyparsing==3.1.1,pyperclip==1.8.2, pyroute2==0.7.9,python-barbicanclient==5.6.1,python-cinderclient==9.4.0,pyth on-dateutil==2.8.2,python-glanceclient==4.4.0,python-keystoneclient==5.2.0,p ython-neutronclient==11.1.0,pytz==2023.3.post1,PyYAML==6.0.1,redis==5.0.0,re ferencing==0.30.2,repoze.lru==0.7,requests==2.31.0,requestsexceptions==1.4.0 ,retrying==1.3.4,rfc3986==2.0.0,Routes==2.5.1,rpds-py==0.10.3,simplejson==3. 19.1,six==1.16.0,sortedcontainers==2.4.0,SQLAlchemy==1.4.41,statsd==4.0.1,st evedore==5.1.0,tenacity==6.3.1,testresources==2.0.1,testscenarios==0.5.0,tes ttools==2.7.0,tooz==4.2.0,typing_extensions==4.8.0,tzdata==2023.3,urllib3==1 .26.16,vine==5.0.0,virtualenv==20.24.5,voluptuous==0.13.1,warlock==2.0.1,wcw idth==0.2.6,WebOb==1.8.7,websockify==0.11.0,wrapt==1.15.0,yappi==1.4.0,zipp= =3.17.0 pep8 run-test-pre: PYTHONHASHSEED='2048831401' pep8 run-test: commands[0] | pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure [INFO] Locking pre-commit directory [INFO] Initializing environment for https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks. An unexpected error has occurred: CalledProcessError: command: ('/usr/bin/git', 'fetch', 'origin', '--tags') return code: 128 stdout: (none) stderr: (none) Check the log at /root/.cache/pre-commit/pre-commit.log ERROR: InvocationError for command /opt/stack/nova/.tox/pep8/bin/pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure (exited with code 3) ____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ summary ____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ ERROR: pep8: commands failed

2 2

Issue when connecting to openstack object storage with openstacksdk
by sadir＠free.fr 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Hello, I am currently developing a software application to access the OpenStack object store service on an IBM Spectrum Scale server. I first created a Python application which is manipulating objects and containers thru the OpenStack's object storage REST API (https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/object-store) It works fine and I had no issue to access the server object store service by this way. But I also need to access the OpenStack object store service thru the openstacksdk (https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest) Unfortunately, the connection does not seem to work properly in this case, even when using the same identifiers than in the working Python/REST application. The connection stalls and goes into some sort of timeout. I also made some tests by putting wrong identifiers, and then it fails immediately with a different error message. It makes me think that something goes wrong after the authentication process. The error message I have is this one: Failed to contact the endpoint at http://yeti.ds.eurecom.fr:8080/v1/AUTH_da0d8589692741d1b2a82956568227e6 for discovery. Fallback to using that endpoint as the base url. I am wondering if there is some additional configuration to perform on the server or the network to make it work as expected. Could you please provide me with some support so that I can sort out what's going on? I could of course share the Python piece of code I am using for my testing. Thank you for your help.

5 4

zun containers
by Jaime Ibar 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Hi, anyone using zun for containers? I'm getting an error when launching one. Thanks Jaime -- Jaime

1 0

RE: openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 62, Issue 108- Neutron Issue | Urgent Assistance
by Asma Naz Shariq 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Hi Neutron_ Team I have deployed Multinode cluster of Openstack through kolla-ansible zed release. The problem I am facing is instances created cannot pick any Ip addresses (Rather than loop back ip or ipv6 addresses) from the created tenant networks with the default network type is vxlan. However, if I can assign ip manually to the eth0 interface in cirros instance, the interface is up with the ip address, but still, it can’t able to ping even its router gateway. Router can’t be able to ping instance ip address but only ping itself as verified below: The following troubleshooting steps, I have followed and concluded: ~ The Tenant network is created and its port: network: router_interface, network:dhcp, compute:nova are in admin up and active state. ~ The router interfaces are in up state and in complete nova zone. ~ The instance is running and active state and automatically pick ip address from the created tenant network as displayed in gui but inside the vm it can’t pick any ip address. ~ The security groups have been defined to allow icmp, tcp, udp for inbound/outbound traffic. Hence, I may not be able to ping and ssh instance from the controller node further these instances won’t be able to connect to the internet until the issue get resolved. Can you guide me how to resolve these issues related to network connectivity so I may able to send you the required files to troubleshoot easily? -----Original Message----- From: openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 7:39 PM To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Subject: openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 62, Issue 108 Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openstack-discuss-request(a)lists.openstack.org You can reach the person managing the list at openstack-discuss-owner(a)lists.openstack.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [trove][victoria] can't connect to trove DB from outside - although ssh to the trove instance works (Tony Breeds) 2. Re: [trove][victoria] can't connect to trove DB from outside - although ssh to the trove instance works (dieter.dorra(a)hsnr.de) 3. Re: Trove installation filed (dieter.dorra(a)hsnr.de) 4. Re: Trove installation filed (KEREM CELIKER) 5. Re: [kolla] ceilometer and nova compute agent (KEREM CELIKER) 6. Re: ceilometer cli client install help (KEREM CELIKER) 7. [neutron] Bug deputy report (last week of 2023) (Bernard Cafarelli) 8. New OpenStack machine on new node not responding (kjme001(a)gmail.com) 9. Re: New OpenStack machine on new node not responding ( 韩光宇 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:28:42 +1100 From: Tony Breeds <tony(a)bakeyournoodle.com> Subject: Re: [trove][victoria] can't connect to trove DB from outside - although ssh to the trove instance works To: dieter.dorra(a)hsnr.de Cc: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Message-ID: <CAFT5D2RzaXi6==waA732R0PVe6H0OeKBwzF_qUSOTHPVfCu7Ww(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 19:58, <dieter.dorra(a)hsnr.de> wrote: > > >From the guest vm I can ssh into the trove instance (so port 22 is > >open and accepting) From the guest vm I cannot reach port 3306 From > >within the trove instance I can reach port 3306 and mysql is > >functional > > It feels like the security group does not allow 3306, but the entry is > there (see etherpad) > > What puzzles me is that netstat in the trove instance does only show > listen to 3306 for tcp6 but not for tcp - whereas 22 listens for tcp6 > AND tcp > > root@ms57plain:~# netstat -anp | head -17 Active Internet connections > (servers and established) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3867/systemd-resolv > tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1074/sshd > tcp 0 0 10.9.9.126:22 10.9.9.128:60126 ESTABLISHED 9412/sshd: root@pts > tcp 0 0 10.10.10.84:54326 10.0.0.120:5672 ESTABLISHED 1002/python3 > tcp 0 0 10.9.9.126:22 10.9.9.128:57880 ESTABLISHED 9021/sshd: root@pts > tcp 0 0 10.10.10.84:44266 10.0.0.120:5672 ESTABLISHED 1002/python3 > tcp6 0 0 :::3306 :::* LISTEN 4881/mysqld You can see here that mysql is listening on all interfaces via an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#IPv4-mapped_IPv6_addresses) and from your previous post we can see that there is an explicit ACCEPT for the lo interface. That's how you're able to get access to the DB from within the guest. It looks to me that whatever added the ' -A openstack-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT' to the guest's firewall didn't also add an explicit rule for the database. At this point I don't know if that's trove, nova or neutron. If I had to guess I'd say that there is a mismatch in the trove configuration and the networks assigned to the guest. For example how does --- network_driver = trove.network.neutron.NeutronDriver # provider management_networks = 98b0de37-40af-4859-81f2-d89a4df2d6df # trovemgmt # provider ## management_networks = 3928eb68-edf9-4cca-8fa6-151ed26b7c04 # trove-mgmt 3928eb68-edf9-4cca-8fa6-151ed26b7c04 # management_networks = 3928eb68-edf9-4cca-8fa6-151ed26b7c04 management_security_groups = 26c4af6e-56f0-4644-8c55-e96983c74c1d --- relate to the "dozenet" and "trovemgmt" networks. Tony. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:27:37 -0000 From: dieter.dorra(a)hsnr.de Subject: Re: [trove][victoria] can't connect to trove DB from outside - although ssh to the trove instance works To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Message-ID: <170402205718.409.7027996557330367167(a)lists01.opendev.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The problem is solved! I tested a newer trove image from https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/trove/images/ The Victoria image caused the problem, it never showed the exposed ports in "docker ps". The Zed image is working: ubuntu@dd:~$ docker ps CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES 1741ae3e7815 mysql:5.7.29 "docker-entrypoint.s…" 4 minutes ago Up 4 minutes 0.0.0.0:3306->3306/tcp, :::3306->3306/tcp, 33060/tcp database ubuntu@dd:~$ Thank you all so much for your assistance and help!!! Happy new year!! ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 16:49:39 -0000 From: dieter.dorra(a)hsnr.de Subject: Re: Trove installation filed To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Message-ID: <170404137950.409.18389774625483655904(a)lists01.opendev.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, when you log in as user trove in the service project - can you launch an instance? "no valid host was found" sounds that nova has a problem... BR Dieter ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 05:40:46 -0000 From: "KEREM CELIKER" <kmceliker(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: Trove installation filed To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Message-ID: <170408764655.409.16151116383780837301(a)lists01.opendev.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Please provide and check the Trove guest agent log file (by default, /var/log/trove/trove-guestagent.log) for any errors or warnings.. Also share with us the logs output that we can take a look. By the way, dont forget to check this following link to troubleshoot; https://docs.openstack.org/trove/latest/admin/troubleshooting.html Kerem Çeliker ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 05:46:32 -0000 From: "KEREM CELIKER" <kmceliker(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [kolla] ceilometer and nova compute agent To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Message-ID: <170408799208.407.10760598762569499228(a)lists01.opendev.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" You dont need to create a custom nova container to measure instances metrics. Only can use the “openstack host show” and “openstack server list” to get basic stats on resource usage for hosts and instances. Also use tools, such as Ganglia or Graphite, to gather more detailed data. It’s up to you! Kerem Çeliker ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 06:07:02 -0000 From: "KEREM CELIKER" <kmceliker(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: ceilometer cli client install help To: openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org Message-ID: <170408922210.407.17546497674894904858(a)lists01.opendev.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" It seems that you have not gnocchi plugin on OSP All-In-One. Also your OSP has not correct openstack client version or you needed the install the gnocchi plugin correctly. Please check gnocchi plugin if installed.. Here is the cli’s ; • openstack plugin list and check for gnocchi in the output any issues.. or try it; • pip install python-gnocchiclient. Kerem Çeliker ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:52:31 +0100 From: Bernard Cafarelli <bcafarel(a)redhat.com> Subject: [neutron] Bug deputy report (last week of 2023) To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss(a)lists.openstack.org> Message-ID: <CABHdKwov77XQ31h26vq6UvzyOjaANcU1F6zjY1opS_H2XZp=PQ(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001b8f3a060df29f3c" Hey neutrinos, and happy new year! Here is the bug reported between 2023-12-25 and 2023-12-31 (as per tradition, it was a quiet week) The firewall group is ACTIVE without associate with a router or any firewall policies - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2047325 neutron-fwaas bug, patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-fwaas/+/904317 Best wishes -- Bernard Cafarelli

2 5

[neutron] Drivers meeting
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Hello Neutrinos: Today we have the Neutron drivers meeting at 14:00UTC. There is one topic in the agenda [1]: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2047849: [RFE] Start using oslo messaging namespaces See you in the IRC Neutron channel. [1]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers#Agenda

1 0

[TC][Monasca] Proposal to mark Monasca as an inactive project
by Sławek Kapłoński 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

Hi, I just proposed patch [1] to mark Monasca as inactive project. It was discussed during last TC meeting on 03.10.2023. Reasons for that are described in the commit message of the [1] but I will also put all of it here: previous cycle there wasn't almost any contributions to that project and most active contributors in last 180 days were Elod Illes and Dr. Jens Harbott who were fixing some Zuul configuration issues only. Here are detailed statistics about Monasca projects: Validating Gerrit... * There are 7 ready for review patches generated within 180 days * There are 2 not reviewed patches generated within 180 days * There are 5 merged patches generated within 180 days * Unreviewed patch rate for patches generated within 180 days is 28.0 % * Merged patch rate for patches generated within 180 days is 71.0 % * Here's top 10 owner for patches generated within 180 days (Name/Account_ID: Percentage): - Dr. Jens Harbott : 42.86% - Joel Capitao : 28.57% - Elod Illes : 28.57% Validate Zuul... Set buildsets fetch size to 500 * Repo: openstack/monasca-log-api gate job builds success rate: 82% * Repo: openstack/monasca-statsd gate job builds success rate: 95% * Repo: openstack/monasca-tempest-plugin gate job builds success rate: 81% * Repo: openstack/monasca-common gate job builds success rate: 84% * Repo: openstack/monasca-kibana-plugin gate job builds success rate: 83% * Repo: openstack/monasca-ceilometer gate job builds success rate: 100% * Repo: openstack/monasca-events-api gate job builds success rate: 83% * Repo: openstack/monasca-ui gate job builds success rate: 88% * Repo: openstack/monasca-specs gate job builds success rate: 100% * Repo: openstack/monasca-grafana-datasource gate job builds success rate: 100% * Repo: openstack/monasca-persister gate job builds success rate: 98% * Repo: openstack/monasca-notification gate job builds success rate: 93% * Repo: openstack/monasca-thresh gate job builds success rate: 100% * Repo: openstack/monasca-api gate job builds success rate: 76% * Repo: openstack/monasca-agent gate job builds success rate: 98% * Repo: openstack/python-monascaclient gate job builds success rate: 100% * Repo: openstack/monasca-transform gate job builds success rate: 100% What's next? According to the "Emerging and inactive projects" document [2] if there will be no volunteers who will step up and want to maintain this project before Milestone-2 of the 2024.1 cycle (week of Jan 08 2024) there will be no new release of Monasca in the 2024.1 cycle and TC will discuss if project should be retired. So if You are interested in keeping Monasca alive and active, please reach out to the TC to discuss that ASAP. Thx in advance. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/897520 [2] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inact… -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

8 14