August 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[heat][elections] PTL Candidacy for Antelope Cycle
by Brendan Shephard 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi all, I first wanted to thank Rico for his ongoing commitment to the project over the last cycles. He has provided lots of guidance and help to the Heat project for a long time and his contribution deserves recognition. I am proposing my candidacy for Heat PTL during the Antelope cycle. I have worked with the Heat project for several years both as a user and more recently over the last 2 years as a contributor. I see great potential in the project for our users and look forward to continuing work in order to support features and functionality of the project. Some of my objectives for the next few cycles are: Remove the dependencies on legacy python-*client libraries and instead shift to the openstacksdk client library. While the legacy libraries have served us well, they are starting to show their limitations and the delta in servicibilty will only increase as each project moves towards leveraging the openstacksdk. So this change, while quite extensive will ensure future compatibility with the other OpenStack project teams. Continue ensuring Heat supports the most up-to-date and recent features provided by each project. To ensure Heat is the default and best choice for our users, we need to ensure we are able to leverage the latest available features from the complimentary OpenStack projects. This is an ongoing challenge to stay up-to-date with the changes each cycle and work towards implementing them in Heat. Thank you all for you consideration, and I look forward to the next cycle and continuing to work with you all. Regards, Brendan

3 2

[all] [oslo.messaging] Interest in collaboration on a NATS driver
by Tobias Urdin 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hello everyone, Before continuing on, yes this kind of is a massive effort but it doesn’t have to be, it would be very cool to get a replacement for RabbitMQ as I’m probably not the only one not satisfied with it. I've proposed a very bare POC in [1] but it's long way from being finished, but atleast some basic devstack is passing. NATS [2] is a cloud-native scalable messaging system that supports the one-to-many and pub-sub methods that we can use to implement it as a oslo.messaging driver. This would make OpenStack easier to deploy in a highly available fashion, reduce outages related to RabbitMQ, free up memory and CPU usage by RabbitMQ (it’s insane when using clustering) and embrace a more cloud-native approach for our software that runs the cloud, alternatives is also welcome :) The POC has a lot of things that could be improved for example: • Do retries and acknowledgements in the library (since NATS does NOT persist messages like RabbitMQ could) • Handle reconnects or interruptions (for example resubscribe to topics etc) • Timeouts need to be implemented and handled • Investigate maximum message payload size • Find or maintain a NATS python library that doesn't use async like the official one does • Add a lot of testing • Cleanup everything noted as TODO in the POC code Now I couldn’t possibly pull this off myself without some collaboration with all of you, even though I’m very motivated to just dig in and do this for the rest of the year and migrate our test fleet there I unfortunately (like everyone else) is juggeling a lot of balls at the same time. If anybody, or any company, out there would be interested in collaborating in a project to bring this support and maintain it feel free to reach out. I’m hoping somebody will bite but atleast I’ve put it out there for all of you. Best regards Tobias [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/848338 [2] https://nats.io

4 7

[ovn-bgp-agent][neutron] - expose_tenant_networks bug
by Satish Patel 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Folks, I am setting up ovn-bgp-agent lab in "BGP mode" and i found everything working great except expose tenant network https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/ovn-bgp-agent-testing-setup/ Lab Summary: 1 controller node 3 compute node ovn-bgp-agent running on all compute node because i am using "enable_distributed_floating_ip=True" ovn-bgp-agent config: [DEFAULT] debug=False expose_tenant_networks=True driver=ovn_bgp_driver reconcile_interval=120 ovsdb_connection=unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock I am not seeing my vm on tenant ip getting exposed but when i attach FIP which gets exposed in loopback address. here is the full trace of debug logs: https://paste.opendev.org/show/buHiJ90nFgC1JkQxZwVk/

2 9

help: set ironic inspect autodiscovery failed
by 陈薇 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi All, I'm trying the ironic inspect autodiscovery but failed. What I did: Set the inspector.conf 1. [discovery] enroll_node_driver = ipmi [processing] permit_active_introspection = true processing_hooks = $default_processing_hooks,extra_hardware,lldp_basic Configure the python agent: inspection_callback_url: There's no node automatically added. I enter the host and read the log of python agent, no inspect related log. Could anybody give any advice about how to triage or setup correctly? Thanks & Regards, Wei

1 1

[election][openstack-ansible] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Dmitriy Rabotyagov 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello. I want to self-nominate for the role of OpenStack-Ansible PTL for the Antelope release cycle. As always, my goal will be to constantly improve existing code, make deployments and further operations as reliable as possible. For the previous cycle we have reached some of previously defined goals, like adding a `service` role, finally implementing service_token_roles and support of CentOS 9 Stream, but there is still room for improvement for role testing. With the return of live events I will do my best to ensure project presence on them and get in touch with operators to gain feedback for project future improvement. -- Kind regards, Dmitriy Rabotyagov

2 1

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Sept 1 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello Everyone, Below is the agenda for Tomorrow's TC meeting schedule at 1500 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting * Roll call * Follow up on past action items * Gate health check ** Bare 'recheck' state *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary * Checks on Zed cycle tracker ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker * 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning ** TC + Leaders interaction sessions *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 ** TC PTG etherpad *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg ** Schedule 'operator hours' as a separate slot in PTG(avoiding conflicts among other projects 'operator hours') *** https://twitter.com/osopsmeetup/status/1561708283492196353 *** https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/bD9kR2yd * 2023.1 cycle Technical Election ** https://governance.openstack.org/election/ * Open Reviews ** https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open -gmann

1 0

[cinder] Extending Feature Freeze Deadline by 1 week
by Rajat Dhasmana 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi All, As discussed in the cinder meeting today, due to the abundance of features proposed[1] and the shortage of review bandwidth, we are planning to extend the feature freeze by one week. Current feature freeze date (for cinder): 01 September 2022 New feature freeze date (for cinder): 08 September 2022 Kindly let me know if there are any objections to the above proposal else all the features proposed are eligible for the feature freeze exception of 1 week. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-features Thanks and regards Rajat Dhasmana

1 0

[election][manila] PTL Candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Carlos Silva 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Greetings, Zorillas and interested stackers, I would like to announce my candidacy to be the Manila PTL during the Antelope cycle. I have been the PTL for Manila since the Zed cycle, and have been contributing to OpenStack since the Stein release. It has been an awesome experience. Over the Zed cycle my focus was to continue mentoring and adding new core reviewers to the Manila repositories; Pursuing feature parity and complete support for manila in OSC (also increasing our functional tests coverage), tackling the tech debt; enhancing the documentation to help third party drivers to set up their CI systems; promoting events to gather the community members and getting bugs fixed and implementations moving faster. I am happy with the progress we made in those areas, but I still think there is room for improvement. During the Antelope cycle, I would like to focus on: - Continue our efforts to mentor contributors and increase the amount of active reviewers through engaging them in the community, teaching the OpenStack way and making it collaboratively as we did in the past cycles, promoting hackathons, bug squashes and collaborative review sessions. - Getting more features already available in the Manila core to Manila UI and get more attention to our changes to OpenStack SDK; - Continue pushing Manila to cover the tech debt areas we identified over the past cycles; - Enforcing maintainers to collaboratively cover the lack of documentation we have on third party CI setups for Manila, helping potential new vendors to quickly setup up their CI systems; Thank you for your consideration! Carlos da Silva IRC: carloss

3 2

[cinder] Antelope PTG Planning
by Rajat Dhasmana 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi All, The virtual PTG for Antelope/2023.1 cycle will be held between 17-21 October 2022. The proposed schedule for cinder is as follows: Dates: Tuesday (18th October) to Friday (21st October) 2022 Time: 1300 to 1700 UTC Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-ptg-cinder-planning Please add topics to the etherpad as early as possible since that will help arrange the topics day wise in the actual PTG etherpad. Thanks and regards Rajat Dhasmana

1 0

[QA][ironic] cycle-with-intermediary deliverables without any release
by Előd Illés 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi, Quick reminder that we'll need a release very soon for a number of deliverables following a cycle-with-intermediary release model but which have not done *any* release yet in the Zed cycle: [ironic*] bifrost ironic-prometheus-exporter ironic-python-agent-builder ironic-ui networking-baremetal networking-generic-switch [Quality Assurance] patrole Those should be released ASAP, and in all cases before September 15th, so that we have a release to include in the final Zed release. (* actually, we DID discuss this already with Ironic release liaisons [1], so this is just a formal reminder for them) [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/%23openstack-rele… Előd Illés irc: elodilles

1 0

[OVN] Error while creating a new instance due to port binding failure
by 박경원 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

1 0

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: August 31st, 15utc
by Thierry Carrez 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG is back from its extended vacation! We will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 15UTC. You can check how that time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20220831T15 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

Take the OpenStack User Survey! Deadline Today!
by Allison Price 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi everyone, I wanted to remind you that today is the last day to complete your 2022 OpenStack User Survey. If you (or a customer) is operating an OpenStack environment, please take time to complete the deployment survey. If you have completed it before, you will just need to update your information, but your previous responses will auto-populate. Complete here: https://www.openstack.org/usersurvey <https://www.openstack.org/usersurvey> Please let me know if you have any issues. Cheers, Allison

1 0

[charms] Nominate Luciano Giudice for charms-ceph core
by Chris MacNaughton 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello all, I'd like to propose Luciano as a new Ceph charms core team member. He has contributed quality changes over the last year, and has been providing quality reviews for the Ceph charms. patches: https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:luciano.logiudice%2540canonical.com reviews: https://review.opendev.org/q/reviewedby:luciano.logiudice%2540canonical.com I hope you will join me in supporting Luciano. Chris MacNaughton

4 3

[election][cloudkitty] PTL candidacy for Antelope
by Rafael Weingärtner 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi all, I would like to self-nominate for the role of PTL of CloudKitty for the Antelope release cycle. I have been PTL since the Victoria cycle and I am willing to continue in this role. I will keep working with existing contributors to maintain CloudKitty for their use cases and encourage the addition of new functionalities. -- Rafael Weingärtner

1 0

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 08-31-2022
by Sofia Enriquez 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

This is a bug report from 08-24-2022 to 08-31-2022. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1987539 "DeprecationWarning: Flags not at the start of the expression." Fix proposed to master. Cheers, Sofia -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[election][Octavia] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Gregory Thiemonge 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi, I would like to announce my candidacy for Octavia PTL for the Antelope release. I have been PTL since the Xena cycle and I want to continue to contribute to this role. During the Antelope cycle we will focus on reviewing/merging some of the opened patches we still have in our backlog (we are a small team but we have been growing, we expect that we will be more efficient in merging patches). For the A cycle we also need to work on the migration to sqlalchemy 2, it will be a huge challenge for our team. Thanks for your consideration, Gregory Thiemonge (gthiemonge)

1 0

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC antelope cycle Election Nominations Extended 7 days
by Amy Marrich 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

We have extended the nomination period 7 days and will overlap the TC campaigning period to accommodate the extension. Thank you everyone who has nominated themselves and for cutting down the list of leaderless projects to 24. Remember there are also 4 open seats for the TC this election cycle which the automated email does not include in this reminder. Thanks, Amy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A quick reminder that we are in the last hours for declaring PTL and TC candidacies. Nominations are open until Sep 07, 2022 23:45 UTC. If you want to stand for election, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your nomination has been submitted to the openstack/election repository and approved by election officials. Election statistics[2]: Nominations started @ 2022-08-24 23:45:00 UTC Nominations end @ 2022-09-07 23:45:00 UTC Nominations duration : 14 days, 0:00:00 Nominations remaining : 7 days, 10:19:33 Nominations progress : 46.93% --------------------------------------------------- Projects[1] : 52 Projects with candidates : 28 ( 53.85%) Projects with election : 0 ( 0.00%) --------------------------------------------------- Need election : 0 () Need appointment : 24 (Adjutant Barbican Cloudkitty Keystone Masakari Mistral Octavia OpenStackAnsible OpenStackSDK OpenStack_Charms Openstack_Chef Oslo Quality_Assurance Rally Release_Management Requirements Sahara Senlin Skyline Swift Trove Venus Zaqar Zun) =================================================== Stats gathered @ 2022-08-31 13:25:27 UTC This means that with approximately 7 days left, 24 projects will be deemed leaderless. In this case the TC will oversee PTL selection as described by [3]. Thank you, [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy [2] Any open reviews at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+project:openstack/election have not been factored into these stats. [3] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for…

1 0

[openstack-ansible] Converged compute ans ceph storage
by fv＠spots.edu 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello everyone! Is it possible with OpenStack-Ansible to deploy converged nova compute and ceph storage on a single node? Thank you!

3 2

[openstack-ansible][ceph][yoga] wait for all osd to be up
by Father Vlasie 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello everyone, I am running setup-infrastucture.yml. I have followed the ceph production example here: https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/user/ceph/full-deploy.h… I have set things up so the compute and storage nodes are the same machine (hyperconverged). And the storage devices are devoid of any volumes or partitions. I see the following error: ------ FAILED - RETRYING: [compute3 -> infra1_ceph-mon_container-0d679d8d]: wait for all osd to be up (1 retries left). fatal: [compute3 -> infra1_ceph-mon_container-0d679d8d(192.168.3.145)]: FAILED! => {"attempts": 60, "changed": false, "cmd": ["ceph", "--cluster", "ceph", "osd", "stat", "-f", "json"], "delta": "0:00:00.223291", "end": "2022-08-22 19:36:29.473358", "msg": "", "rc": 0, "start": "2022-08-22 19:36:29.250067", "stderr": "", "stderr_lines": [], "stdout": "\n{\"epoch\":6,\"num_osds\":0,\"num_up_osds\":0,\"osd_up_since\":0,\"num_in_osds\":0,\"osd_in_since\":0,\"num_remapped_pgs\":0}", "stdout_lines": ["", "{\"epoch\":6,\"num_osds\":0,\"num_up_osds\":0,\"osd_up_since\":0,\"num_in_osds\":0,\"osd_in_since\":0,\"num_remapped_pgs\":0}”]} ------ I am not sure where to look to find more information. Any help would be much appreciated! Thank you, FV

2 2

[election][designate] PTL Candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Michael Johnson 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello OpenStack community, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of Designate for the Antelope cycle. I would like to continue to support the Designate team for the Antelope release. As predicted, we have continued to focus on cleaning up technical debt and improving the test coverage. For a small team, we have accomplished a lot in the Zed release, though we could use more reviewers to help with the backlog of patches in need of review and comments. I expect the code cleanup will continue, but I hope we can also focus more on some of the proposed features that are in flight. Thank you for your support and your consideration for Antelope, Michael Johnson (johnsom)

1 0

[cinder] propose to EOL cinderlib train and ussuri
by Brian Rosmaita 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

At last week's cinder project midcycle [0], the team discussed recent fixes to keep the cinderlib CI functional in the oldest stable branches. At this point, stable/train is running the bare minimum of CI to keep the branch open, and stable/ussuri is running only one functional job in excess of the bare minimum. The only changes merged into either branch since each was tagged -em have been non-functional, so we believe that there is no demand for keeping the branches open. Thus, the following patches to EOL cinderlib train and ussuri have been posted: - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/853534 - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/853535 This email serves as notice of the intent of the cinder project to EOL the cinderlib train and ussuri branches. If you have comments or concerns, please reply to this email or leave a comment on the appropriate patch. [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-midcycles

1 1

[blazar][election] PTL candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Pierre Riteau 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi, I would like to self-nominate for the role of PTL of Blazar for the Antelope release cycle. I have been PTL since the Stein cycle and I am willing to continue in this role. Though we had a quiet Zed cycle, we still have various improvements in the pipeline and I want to help the community deliver them to make Blazar more useful. Thank you for your support, Pierre Riteau (priteau)

1 0

[election][puppet] PTL Candidacy for Antelope cycle
by Takashi Kajinami 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello, I'd like to announce my candidacy for the PTL role in Puppet OpenStack, to continue my PTL role for the Antelope cycle. Over the past two cycles, we've successfully improved feature coverage, platform coverage and simplicity of our modules. I'd like to list up a few items which would be our priorities during the next cycle. * Add Ubuntu 22.04 support This would be the next major change after we've completed implementation of CentOS 9 Stream support. We already adapted to Ruby 3 as part of C9S support so I'm not aware of any huge challenges at this moment. * Complete migration to Puppet 7 Currently our modules still support both Puppet 6 and 7. However once we complete migration to Ubuntu 22.04, we complete migration from Ruby 2.x to 3.x. As Puppet officially supports Ruby 3.x since 7.7, this means we no longer maintain test coverage with Puppet 6. It's time to consider again complete migration to Puppet 7. * Improve scenario/component coverage by CI During Zed cycle we added OVN and Octavia to the integration jobs. We'll review a few remaining modules like Manila and will continue extending the component coverage. * Review unmaintained/unused modules In Puppet OpenStack projects we maintain number of modules to support multiple OpenStack components. However, some modules have not been really active and attracted no interest. In the past few cycles we have retired several modules but I'd like to continue reviewing our modules to consider retiring inactive ones. * Keep each module up to date and simple It's always important that we add support for the new features/parameters timely so that users can leverage the new capability via our modules. Thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Takashi

3 2

[election][cinder] PTL Candidacy for Antelope
by Rajat Dhasmana 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the Cinder project for the Antelope cycle. I served as the PTL for Cinder during the Zed development cycle and targeted some of the areas which were lacking attention and worked on improving them like: 1. Review Quality Proposing the Efficient Review Guidelines[1] to help new contributors improve the quality of reviews. 2. Security Vulnerabilities Triaged the open security issues during the first mid cycle[2]. There are still areas which could be improved upon like 3rd Party Compliance checks and Cinder driver documentation which are good candidates of work items for the next development cycle and I look forward to actively work on them. Apart from that, there were deadlines which could have been better handled which I would like to incorporate in my planning skills so we get things merged in time and we won't have to extend deadlines frequently. Overall, I feel it was a good learning experience being PTL for the first time and I'm thankful for all the support I've had from the team, not to mention the advice and help from Brian while making critical decisions, and Hopefully I will take the learnings to be a better PTL this time. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/contributor/gerrit.html#efficient-… [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-zed-midcycles#L136 Rajat Dhasmana (whoami-rajat)

1 0