October 2022 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[interop][ptg] Virtual PTG Planning
by Martin Kopec 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello everyone, here is [1] our etherpad for Antelope PTG with the topics we're planning to discuss. If there is anything you would like to bring up with the interop team, feel free to let us know. We've booked 3 one hour slots: * Monday (October 17th) 13 - 14 UTC @ kilo * Tuesday (October 18th) 15 - 16 UTC @ kilo * Thursday (October 20th) 15 - 16 UTC @ liberty In case we'll see a need for more, we can always book something else later. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-ptg-interop Thanks, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA IM: kopecmartin

2 1

[Glance][PTG] Antelope PTG Schedule
by Pranali Deore 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello All, Antelope PTG is going to start next week and we have created our PTG etherpad [1] and also added day wise topics along with timings we are going to discuss. Kindly let me know if you have any concerns with allotted time slots. Friday is reserved for any unplanned discussions. So please feel free to add your topics if you haven't added yet. As a reminder, these are the time slots for our discussion. Tuesday 18 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Wednesday 19 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Thursday 20 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC Friday 21 OCT 2022 1400 UTC to 1700 UTC NOTE: We have booked glance operator hours on Thursday at 1600 UTC(we can extend it if required), let us know your availability for the same. At the moment we don't have any sessions scheduled on Friday, if there are any last moment request(s)/topic(s) we will discuss that on Friday else we will conclude our PTG on Thursday 20th OCT. We will be using bluejeans for our discussion, kindly try to use it once before the actual discussion. The meeting URL is mentioned in etherpad [1] and will be the same throughout the PTG. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-glance-ptg Hope to see you there!! Thanks & Regards, Pranali Deore

1 0

[tacker][ptg] Announcement about operator hours
by ma-ooyama＠kddi.com 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello all: The "operator-hour-tacker" has been reserved on 19-Oct Wednesday from 04UTC to 05UTC. This is the oppotunity to share operator's opinion with developers. Please feel free for adding any topics you'd like to discuss on the etherpad [1]. [1]https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2022-ptg-operator-hour-tacker Thanks, Masaki

1 0

[ussuri] controller has crond PAM errors
by Ruslanas Gžibovskis 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hi all, First of all, I understand it is old release, but, maybe it is present in newer also? Running centos8Linux and centos repos based OSP installation (not delorean). I am scrolling through logs and found that cron is having some curious log line related to pam. curious if that is normal? /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: (cinder) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: (cinder) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: (heat) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: (nova) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: (heat) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: (nova) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: (nova) PAM ERROR (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/cron:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: (nova) FAILED to open PAM security session (Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session) /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770496]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770881]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed /var/log/secure:Oct 12 00:01:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[770426]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed /var/log/secure:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): Error writing /proc/self/loginuid: Operation not permitted /var/log/secure:Oct 12 05:00:01 c506-ctrl-0 crond[773036]: pam_loginuid(crond:session): set_loginuid failed -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030

1 0

[tripleo] Gate blocker
by Arx Cruz 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello, We are facing another gate blocker related to package dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1992560, please do not recheck your patches. We are working to fix the issue. Kind regards, -- Arx Cruz Software Engineer Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com> arxcruz(a)redhat.com @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

2 4

[swift] upgrade newton to train in containers
by Marcel 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

I'm planning an upgrade for our newton based swift cluster (OOO vm based) to a (kolla image based containers) train cluster So far I have tested the upgrade for the proxies, account_servers and container servers and it looks promising. I have in a test environment: - switched to the new proxies with the old ring files and it looks like everything works normally - Added the new (train) account and container servers to the rings and it looks like all is fine - Removed the old account and container servers, still fine - tested fall back, also fine My question actually is: Did the account and container database format change between newton and train in such a way that I might run into troubles trying the upgrade as tested above in ways that I did not yet foresee? Thanks Marcel

1 0

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on 2022 Oct 13 at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hello Everyone, The technical Committee's next weekly meeting is scheduled for 2022 Oct 13, at 1500 UTC. If you would like to add topics for discussion, please add them to the below wiki page by Wednesday, Oct 12 at 2100 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting -gmann

1 1

Edge Computing Group sessions at the PTG
by Ildiko Vancsa 13 Oct '22

13 Oct '22

Hi All, I’m reaching out with a quick update regarding the OpenInfra Edge Computing Group sessions at the upcoming PTG next week. The group settled on booking a Monday time slot that overlaps with our usual meeting hour: __Monday (October 17) at 1300 UTC - 1600 UTC__. Our main discussion topics will include: * Edge use cases in production * Day 0 - prepare your edge deployment * Roadmap for the working group Beth Cohen from Verizon will also give a presentation during our scheduled time. For further information please see our etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ecg-ptg-october-2022 Looking forward to seeing you at the event! Best Regards, Ildikó ——— Ildikó Váncsa Senior Manager, Community & Ecosystem Open Infrastructure Foundation

1 0

Re: How do I disable replication in swift
by Alvaro Soto 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

question: Do you want to delete replicas of old objects? o just disable it for future objects until you get more disk/nodes? for the second did you try to stop the object replicator service? On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:04 AM Paladox <thomasmulhall410(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks! But that doesn’t tell you how to disable as the value must be one > or higher? Unless it’s not 1+1 (or what ever you set as the replica value). > > On Thursday, 22 September 2022 at 19:58:41 BST, Alvaro Soto < > alsotoes(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Check changing the replica counts > > > https://docs.openstack.org/swift/xena/admin/objectstorage-ringbuilder.html#… > > --- > Alvaro Soto. > > Note: My work hours may not be your work hours. Please do not feel the > need to respond during a time that is not convenient for you. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Great people talk about ideas, > ordinary people talk about things, > small people talk... about other people. > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, 6:54 AM Paladox <thomasmulhall410(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello, I would like Swift to only have 1 file not any copies of it, how do > I disable replication as you must set the value to 1 when you create the > rings? > > (We don’t have the disk space to have replication / copies of the files) > > -- Alvaro Soto *Note: My work hours may not be your work hours. Please do not feel the need to respond during a time that is not convenient for you.* ---------------------------------------------------------- Great people talk about ideas, ordinary people talk about things, small people talk... about other people.

3 7

[dev][infra][tact-sig] Default Zuul nodeset changing to ubuntu-jammy
by Jeremy Stanley 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

Just wanted to call everyone's attention to an OpenDev Collaboratory announcement[*] this week. The tl;dr is that the default job nodeset will be changing from ubuntu-focal to ubuntu-jammy on 2022-10-25. This should be fairly low-impact for OpenStack projects, since we're now into the very early part of the 2023.1/Antelope release cycle and development branch unit test job templates have already been updated to run things on the newer Python version it supplies. Just be aware that any jobs which don't already specify a particular nodeset (or inherit one from a parent) will be following the default when it changes. An easy temporary workaround is to set affected jobs back to ubuntu-focal while you test solutions allowing removal of the override. Also, remember that switching development from Focal to Jammy was accepted[**] as a cross-project goal, so it needs to get done at some point soon for OpenStack projects anyway. [*] https://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/service-announce/2022-October/000047.ht… [**] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/migrate-ci-jobs-to-ubunt… -- Jeremy Stanley

2 1